IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2021v12p104-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of bribery predictors for the student population. Evidence from Romania and Moldova

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelian-Petrus PLOPEANU

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania)

  • Daniel HOMOCIANU

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

This study analyzes the bribery acceptance propensity. We used 5072 responses from students in economics (seven universities from the Republic of Moldova and two Romanian regions). We wanted to see communism's impact on this inclination from east to west in territories with Romanian origins. We used purposive sampling, Data Mining, OLS, and Logit regressions with marginal effects and prediction nomograms. Theoretically, we found that proximity to Western countries matters for explaining differences between models. We also discovered strong common influences: competition (negative and mightier for Central-Western Romania), accepting undue advantages, and the immoral act of buying stolen goods (both positive and more potent for Moldova). We additionally identified peculiarities: the desire to become an entrepreneur, anti-democratic attitudes, attitude towards the interventionist role of the state in the economy, nepotism, tax evasion behaviour, inherited sense of responsibility, altruism, and hard work, mother's faith in God, interpersonal trust and individual freedom.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelian-Petrus PLOPEANU & Daniel HOMOCIANU, 2021. "Analysis of bribery predictors for the student population. Evidence from Romania and Moldova," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12, pages 104-140, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2021:v:12:p:104-140
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2021-0105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2021_1201_PLO.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2021-0105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrico Colombatto, 2003. "Why is Corruption Tolerated?," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 16(4), pages 363-379, December.
    2. Davidson, Russell & MacKinnon, James G., 1993. "Estimation and Inference in Econometrics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195060119.
    3. Inna Cabelkova & Jan Hanousek, 2004. "The power of negative thinking: corruption, perception and willingness to bribe in Ukraine," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 383-397.
    4. Sheley, Joseph F. & Bailey, Kenneth D., 1985. "New directions for anti-theft policy: Reductions in stolen goods buyers," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 399-415.
    5. Drugov, Mikhail, 2010. "Competition in bureaucracy and corruption," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 107-114, July.
    6. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    7. Schulze, Max-Stephan, 2007. "Regional income dispersion and market potential in the late nineteenth century Hapsburg Empire," Economic History Working Papers 22311, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    8. Annamária Heuer & Francisco Liñán, 2013. "Testing alternative measures of subjective norms in entrepreneurial intention models," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 35-50.
    9. Mr. Vito Tanzi, 1994. "Corruption, Governmental Activities, and Markets," IMF Working Papers 1994/099, International Monetary Fund.
    10. Edmund J. Malesky & Dimitar D. Gueorguiev & Nathan M. Jensen, 2015. "Monopoly Money: Foreign Investment and Bribery in Vietnam, a Survey Experiment," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(2), pages 419-439, February.
    11. Mocan, Naci & Bielen, Samantha & Marneffe, Wim, 2020. "Quality of judicial institutions, crimes, misdemeanors, and dishonesty," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. de Jong, Eelke & Bogmans, Christian, 2011. "Does corruption discourage international trade?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 385-398, June.
    13. Ryvkin, Dmitry & Serra, Danila, 2020. "Corruption and competition among bureaucrats: An experimental study," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 439-451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leonidas A. Zampetakis & Manolis Lerakis & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Vassilis S. Moustakis, 2016. "The moderating role of anticipated affective ambivalence in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 815-838, September.
    2. Dmitriy Knyazev, 2023. "How to fight corruption: Carrots and sticks," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 61(2), pages 413-429, April.
    3. Colin Donaldson & Francisco Liñán & Joaquin Alegre, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Intentions: Moving the Field Forwards," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 30(1), pages 30-55, March.
    4. Diana Traikova & Tatiana S. Manolova & Judith Möllers & Gertrud Buchenrieder, 2017. "Corruption Perceptions And Entrepreneurial Intentions In A Transitional Context–The Case Of Rural Bulgaria," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(03), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Philipp Kruse, 2020. "Can there only be one? – an empirical comparison of four models on social entrepreneurial intention formation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 641-665, June.
    6. James J. Chrisman & Jess H. Chua & Allison W. Pearson & Tim Barnett, 2012. "Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family–Centered Non–Economic Goals in Small Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(2), pages 267-293, March.
    7. Dmitry Ryvkin & Danila Serra, 2019. "Is More Competition Always Better? An Experimental Study Of Extortionary Corruption," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 57(1), pages 50-72, January.
    8. Asif Reza ANIK & Siegfried BAUER & Mohammad Jahangir ALAM, 2013. "Why farm households have differences in corruption experiences? Evidences from Bangladesh," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(10), pages 478-488.
    9. Kurt Wurthmann, 2017. "Implicit Theories and Issue Characteristics as Determinants of Moral Awareness and Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(1), pages 93-116, April.
    10. Karina Bogatyreva & Galina Shirokova, 2017. "From Entrepreneurial Aspirations to Founding a Business: The Case of Russian Students," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 25-36.
    11. Asim Nasar & Suzilawati Kamarudin & Adriana Mohd Rizal & Vu Thi Bich Ngoc & Samar Mohammad Shoaib, 2019. "Short-Term and Long-Term Entrepreneurial Intention Comparison between Pakistan and Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-26, November.
    12. Paola Bernardi & Alberto Bertello & Canio Forliano & Ludovico Bullini Orlandi, 2022. "Beyond the “ivory tower”. Comparing academic and non-academic knowledge on social entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 999-1032, September.
    13. Soham Baksi & Pinaki Bose, 2023. "Bribery, Reneging, and Competition Among Bureaucrats," Departmental Working Papers 2023-01, The University of Winnipeg, Department of Economics.
    14. Ioannis Giotopoulos & Alexandra Kontolaimou & Aggelos Tsakanikas, 2017. "Drivers of high-quality entrepreneurship: what changes did the crisis bring about?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 913-930, April.
    15. Phan Thi Hang Nga & Pham Minh Tien, 2024. "The impact of public expenditure on economic growth in Vietnamese localities: Research in the context of the impact of Covid-19," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 14(1), pages 50-64.
    16. May, Daniel E., 2015. "Behavioural Drivers of Business Competitiveness in Agriculture," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22.
    17. Inés Ruiz-Rosa & Desiderio Gutiérrez-Taño & Francisco J. García-Rodríguez, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurial Intention and the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic: A Structural Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-17, August.
    18. Christopher Schlaegel & Michael Koenig, 2014. "Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intent: A Meta–Analytic Test and Integration of Competing Models," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 38(2), pages 291-332, March.
    19. Katharina Fellnhofer & Susan Mueller, 2018. "“I Want to Be Like You!”: The Influence of Role Models on Entrepreneurial Intention," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(02), pages 113-153, June.
    20. Preeti Tiwari & Anil K. Bhat & Jyoti Tikoria, 2017. "An empirical analysis of the factors affecting social entrepreneurial intentions," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 7(1), pages 1-25, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2021:v:12:p:104-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.