IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/iujspc/v0y2019i77p383-420.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Avrupa İşçi Sendikaları Konfederasyonunun (ETUC) Küreselleşme Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi

Author

Listed:
  • Ali İhsan BALCI

    (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İktisat Fakültesi, Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

  • Mehmet GÜLER

    (İstanbul Üniversitesi, İktisat Fakültesi, Çalışma Ekonomisi ve Endüstri İlişkileri Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)

Abstract

Küreselleşme süreci ülkelere ekonomik, siyasal ve sosyal alanlarda değişim ve dönüşüm yaşatmış ve yaşatmaktadır. Ülkelerin sosyal politikaları ve çalışma ilişkileri kurumları da küreselleşmenin yaşatmış olduğu bu dönüşümden fazlasıyla etkilenmektedir. Küreselleşme süreci ile birlikte ortaya çıkan yeni üretim ve yönetim teknikleri sebebiyle endüstri ilişkilerinin en önemli aktörlerinden biri olan sendikalar için olumsuz bir ortam oluşmuştur. Nitekim süreçte etkinliği artan çok uluslu şirketlerin artık yerel olarak örgütlenmektense uluslar üstü örgütlenmeye gittikleri görülmektedir. Sendikaların en önemli gücü olan toplu ses mekanizması ve küresel boyutta örgütlenme istekleri sanayi devriminin yaşandığı yıllardan beri mevcuttur. Fakat günümüzde sendikaların bu isteklerini sadece küresel düzeyde bir üst örgüt çatısı altında örgütlenmekle sınırlı olarak gerçekleştirdiklerini söylemek mümkündür. Küresel üst sendikal örgütler sadece çalışma hayatındaki işçi ve işveren arasındaki sorunlarla ilgilenmenin yanı sıra toplumsal hayattaki diğer dezavantajlı grupların sorunlarına da odaklanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı ETUC’un küreselleşme sürecindeki dönüşümünü incelemektir. Küreselleşme sürecinde ETUC’da çeşitli değişim ve dönüşümler geçirmiştir. ETUC’un amacı Avrupa düzeyindeki işçi hareketlerinin koordine olmasını sağlamak ve bu işçi hareketlerini tek bir çatı altında örgütlemektir. Bu amacını sürdürürken bölgesel bir güç olma etkinliğini de sürdürmektedir. Bu çalışmada ETUC’un küreselleşme sürecinde geçirmiş olduğu değişimler aktarılarak, günümüzde ETUC’un örgütlenme stratejisi irdelenecektir.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali İhsan BALCI & Mehmet GÜLER, 2019. "Avrupa İşçi Sendikaları Konfederasyonunun (ETUC) Küreselleşme Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi," Journal of Social Policy Conferences, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 0(77), pages 383-420, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2019:i:77:p:383-420
    DOI: 10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/917929
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iusskd/issue/51626/670044
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/jspc.2019.77.0088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyman, Richard, 2005. "Trade unions and the politics of the European social model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 753, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Schmitter, Philippe C. & Streeck, Wolfgang, 1999. "The organization of business interests: Studying the associative action of business in advanced industrial societies," MPIfG Discussion Paper 99/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    3. Daryl D’Art & Thomas Turner, 2007. "Trade Unions and Political Participation in the European Union: Still Providing a Democratic Dividend?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 45(1), pages 103-126, March.
    4. Günther G. Schulze & Heinrich W. Ursprung, 1999. "Globalisation of the Economy and the Nation State," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 295-352, May.
    5. Keith Abbott, 1997. "The European Trade Union Confederation: Its Organization and Objectives in Transition," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 465-481, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seeliger, Martin & Wagner, Ines, 2016. "Workers united? How trade union organizations at the European level form political positions on the freedom of services," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/16, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Rossitsa Rangelova, 2001. "Small Economies and the Challenge of Globalisation," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 86-103.
    3. SÅ‚awomir Adamczyk & Barbara Surdykowska, 2024. "Perspective. The mirage of Europeanising industrial relations. What possibilities for East-West trade union cooperation?," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 30(1), pages 103-115, February.
    4. Kenworthy, Lane, 2000. "Quantitative indicators of corporatism: A survey and assessment," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    5. Potrafke, Niklas, 2013. "Globalization and labor market institutions: International empirical evidence," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 829-842.
    6. Sophie Jacquot & Cornelia Woll, 2003. "Usage of European Integration - Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01019642, HAL.
    7. Thushyanthan Baskaran & Zohal Hessami, 2012. "Public education spending in a globalized world:," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 19(5), pages 677-707, October.
    8. Plehwe, Dieter & Schlögl, Matthias, 2014. "Europäische und zivilgesellschaftliche Hintergründe der euro(pa)skeptischen Partei Alternative für Deutschland (AfD)," Discussion Papers, Project Group Modes of Economic Governance SP III 2014-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    9. Stutzer Alois & Frey Bruno S., 2006. "Making International Organizations More Democratic," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(3), pages 305-330, January.
    10. In Jun & Peter Sheldon, 2006. "Looking beyond the West? The Korea Employers' Federation and the Challenges of Membership Adhesion and Cohesion," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 17(1), pages 203-225, September.
    11. Mark Hallerberg, 2002. "Introduction," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(2), pages 139-150, June.
    12. Adelaide Duarte & Marta Simões & João Sousa Andrade, 2014. "Estado Social, Quantis, Não-Linearidades e Desempenho Económico: Uma Avaliação Empírica," GEMF Working Papers 2014-21, GEMF, Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra.
    13. Milan Zafirovski, 2022. "Some dilemmas of economic democracy: Indicators and empirical analysis," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 252-302, February.
    14. Jane Lethbridge, 2011. "Social dialogue in the hospital sector at EU level," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 17(4), pages 501-513, November.
    15. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/8523 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Bruno S. Frey, 2003. "Flexible Citizenship for a Global Society," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 2(1), pages 93-114, February.
    17. Erauskin, Iñaki, 2015. "The net foreign asset position and government size," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 130-148.
    18. Axel Dreher, 2003. "The Influence of Globalization on Taxes and Social Policy – an Empirical Analysis for OECD Countries," Public Economics 0310002, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Jan 2005.
    19. Gaston, Noel & Rajaguru, Gulasekaran, 2013. "International migration and the welfare state revisited," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 90-101.
    20. Rode, Martin & Sáenz de Viteri, Andrea, 2018. "Expressive attitudes to compensation: The case of globalization," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 42-55.
    21. Bellani, Luna & Scervini, Francesco, 2020. "Heterogeneity in preferences for redistribution and public spending: A cross-country analysis," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:iujspc:v:0:y:2019:i:77:p:383-420. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.