IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/iujecs/v67y2023i0p73-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Liberals at a Crossroads in Post-Gezi Turkiye: Making Sense of a Framing Dispute

Author

Listed:
  • Hilmi Bahadır Akin

    (Department of Tourism, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkiye)

  • Mustafa Cuneyt Özsahin

    (Department of Political Science and International Relations, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkiye)

  • Seyma Akin

    (Department of Political Science and International Relations, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkiye)

Abstract

The Gezi protests were a watershed moment for market liberals since it triggered inter-movement and intra-movement schisms. A flagship institution of market liberals, Liberal Düşünce Topluluğu (the Association of Liberal Thought) underwent such a schismatic process and, consequently, new market-liberal organizations arose from the schism, which was characterized by a frame dispute with the ALT over the policies pursued by the incumbent government, Justice and Development Party (JDP). The framing dispute between the two factions occurred along the lines of securing democracy versus the restriction of state power. This study delineates the root causes of the framing dispute between market liberals. To this end, two factors are proposed to account for it within the context of this paper. These two factors can be encapsulated as the growing conservative/liberal division among market liberals and entrenched interpersonal patronage networks within political circles which is closely related to the changing nature of government-civil society relations in Turkey. Drawing from semi-structured interviews, publications of market liberals, and a good number of secondary sources, we aim to shed light on the rift within market liberals in post-Gezi Turkey.

Suggested Citation

  • Hilmi Bahadır Akin & Mustafa Cuneyt Özsahin & Seyma Akin, 2023. "Market Liberals at a Crossroads in Post-Gezi Turkiye: Making Sense of a Framing Dispute," Journal of Economy Culture and Society, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 67(67), pages 73-95, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:iujecs:v:67:y:2023:i:0:p:73-95
    DOI: 10.26650/JECS2022-1099436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/26209AB8162447E7BED4A3358764DA03
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/en/journal/jecs/article/market-liberals-at-a-crossroads-in-post-gezi-turkiye-making-sense-of-a-framing-dispute
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/JECS2022-1099436?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berk Esen & Sebnem Gumuscu, 2016. "Rising competitive authoritarianism in Turkey," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(9), pages 1581-1606, September.
    2. Müjde Koca-Atabey, 2016. "Gezi park protests in Turkey: how can death be related to the protests?," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 422-430, July.
    3. Ali Bilgiç, 2018. "Reclaiming the National Will: Resilience of Turkish Authoritarian Neoliberalism after Gezi," South European Society and Politics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 259-280, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Özgür Orhangazi & A. Erinç Yeldan, 2021. "The Re‐making of the Turkish Crisis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 460-503, May.
    2. Callais, Justin T. & Mkrtchian, Gor, 2024. "Court-packing and judicial manipulation," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Selin Çağatay, 2018. "Women’s Coalitions beyond the Laicism–Islamism Divide in Turkey: Towards an Inclusive Struggle for Gender Equality?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 48-58.
    4. Senem Aydın‐Düzgit & Gergana Noutcheva, 2022. "External Contestations of Europe: Russia and Turkey as Normative Challengers?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1815-1831, November.
    5. Hazama,Yasushi, 2023. "Welfare, Corruption, and the Economic Vote of Punishment: The Turkish Case," IDE Discussion Papers 908, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    6. Hürcan Asli Aksoy, 2018. "Gendered Strategies between Democratization and Democratic Reversal: The Curious Case of Turkey," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 101-111.
    7. A. Ergur & B. Akkaya & C. Saral, 2024. "Defining faces, defying borders: authority conflicts between medical specialties through cosmetic interventions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Yagci, Alper & Oyvat, Cem, 2018. "Economic Voting and Media Influence in a Competitive Authoritarian Setting: Evidence from Turkey," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 23687, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    9. Sebnem Cansun & Engin Arik, 2018. "Political science publications about Turkey," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(1), pages 169-188, April.
    10. H Bahadir Türk, 2018. "‘Populism as a medium of mass mobilization’: The case of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 21(2), pages 150-168, June.
    11. Pagda, Zeki & Bayraktar, Secil & Jimenez, Alfredo, 2021. "Exploring culture and leadership after 23 years: A replication of GLOBE project in Turkey," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    12. Işık D. Özel & Aslı Unan, 2021. "Decoupling trends: Drivers of agency independence in telecommunications: An analysis of high and middle‐income countries," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 32-62, January.
    13. Pinar Deniz & Burhan Can Karahasan & Mehmet Pinar, 2021. "Determinants of regional distribution of AKP votes: Analysis of post‐2002 parliamentary elections," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 323-352, April.
    14. Morrison, Kelly & Savun, Burcu & Donno, Daniela & Davutoglu, Perisa, 2023. "Competing Verdicts: Multiple Election Monitors and Post-Election Contention," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt3kc4f57j, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    15. Umut Aydin, 2021. "Rule‐takers, rule‐makers, or rule‐promoters? Turkey and Mexico's role as rising middle powers in global economic governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 544-560, July.
    16. Peter Klimek & Raúl Jiménez & Manuel Hidalgo & Abraham Hinteregger & Stefan Thurner, 2018. "Forensic analysis of Turkish elections in 2017–2018," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. İpek Çınar, 2021. "Riding the democracy train: incumbent-led paths to autocracy," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 301-325, September.
    18. Murat Somer, 2019. "Turkey: The Slippery Slope from Reformist to Revolutionary Polarization and Democratic Breakdown," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 681(1), pages 42-61, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:iujecs:v:67:y:2023:i:0:p:73-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ertugrul YASAR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.