IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ortrsc/v50y2016i1p57-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fairness and Collaboration in Network Air Traffic Flow Management: An Optimization Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitris Bertsimas

    (Sloan School of Management and Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Shubham Gupta

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

Air traffic flow management (ATFM) attempts to maintain a safe and efficient flow of aircraft given demand-capacity mismatches while ensuring an equitable distribution of delays among stakeholders. There has been extensive research addressing network effects (such as the presence of multiple airports, sectors, and connectivity requirements) in ATFM, but it has not explicitly incorporated the equitable distribution of delays, as well as work on the equitable distribution of delays in a single-airport setting, such as ration-by-schedule (RBS) as introduced under the collaborative decision-making paradigm. In this paper, we develop a two stage approach for network ATFM that incorporates fairness and airline collaboration. In Stage 1, we propose a discrete optimization model that attempts to incorporate an equitable distribution of delays among airlines by introducing a notion of fairness in network ATFM models—controlling the number of reversals and total amount of overtaking, which is a natural generalization of RBS. For two flights f and f ′, a reversal occurs when flight f ′ arrives before f , when f was scheduled to arrive before f ′. In the event a reversal occurs, the number of time periods between the arrival times constitutes overtaking. In Stage 2, we allow for airline collaboration by proposing a network model for slot reallocation. We provide extensive empirical results of the proposed optimization models on national-scale, real-world data sets spanning six days that show interesting trade-offs between fairness and efficiency. We report computational times of less than 30 minutes for up to 25 airports and provide theoretical evidence that illuminates the strength of our approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitris Bertsimas & Shubham Gupta, 2016. "Fairness and Collaboration in Network Air Traffic Flow Management: An Optimization Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 57-76, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:50:y:2016:i:1:p:57-76
    DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2014.0567
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2014.0567
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/trsc.2014.0567?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Octavio Richetta & Amedeo R. Odoni, 1993. "Solving Optimally the Static Ground-Holding Policy Problem in Air Traffic Control," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 228-238, August.
    2. Cynthia Barnhart & Dimitris Bertsimas & Constantine Caramanis & Douglas Fearing, 2012. "Equitable and Efficient Coordination in Traffic Flow Management," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 262-280, May.
    3. Richetta, Octavio & Odoni, Amedeo R., 1994. "Dynamic solution to the ground-holding problem in air traffic control," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 167-185, May.
    4. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sarah Stock Patterson, 1998. "The Air Traffic Flow Management Problem with Enroute Capacities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 406-422, June.
    5. Thomas W. M. Vossen & Robert Hoffman & Avijit Mukherjee, 2012. "Air Traffic Flow Management," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Cynthia Barnhart & Barry Smith (ed.), Quantitative Problem Solving Methods in the Airline Industry, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 385-453, Springer.
    6. Peter B. Vranas & Dimitris J. Bertsimas & Amedeo R. Odoni, 1994. "The Multi-Airport Ground-Holding Problem in Air Traffic Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 249-261, April.
    7. Hanif D. Sherali & Justin M. Hill & Michael V. McCrea & Antonio A. Trani, 2011. "Integrating Slot Exchange, Safety, Capacity, and Equity Mechanisms Within an Airspace Flow Program," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(2), pages 271-284, May.
    8. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sarah Stock Patterson, 2000. "The Traffic Flow Management Rerouting Problem in Air Traffic Control: A Dynamic Network Flow Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 239-255, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yilmaz, Ibrahim & Yoon, Sang Won, 2020. "Dynamic-distributed decisions and sharing protocol for fair resource sharing in collaborative network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Bolić, Tatjana & Castelli, Lorenzo & Corolli, Luca & Rigonat, Desirée, 2017. "Reducing ATFM delays through strategic flight planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 42-59.
    3. Guo, Yechenfeng & Hu, Minghua & Zou, Bo & Hansen, Mark & Zhang, Ying & Xie, Hua, 2022. "Air Traffic Flow Management Integrating Separation Management and Ground Holding: An Efficiency-Equity Bi-objective Perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 394-423.
    4. Sadeque Hamdan & Oualid Jouini & Ali Cheaitou & Zied Jemai & Tobias Andersson Granberg, 2023. "On the binary formulation of air traffic flow management problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 321(1), pages 267-279, February.
    5. Alexandre Jacquillat & Vikrant Vaze, 2018. "Interairline Equity in Airport Scheduling Interventions," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 941-964, August.
    6. Montlaur, A. & Delgado, L., 2020. "Flight and passenger efficiency-fairness trade-off for ATFM delay assignment," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    7. Chen, Yunxiang & Zhao, Yifei & Wu, Yexin, 2024. "Recent progress in air traffic flow management: A review," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Ignacio A. Sepúlveda & Maichel M. Aguayo & Rodrigo De la Fuente & Guillermo Latorre-Núñez & Carlos Obreque & Camila Vásquez Orrego, 2024. "Scheduling mobile dental clinics: A heuristic approach considering fairness among school districts," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 46-71, March.
    9. Marta Boczoń & Alistair J. Wilson, 2023. "Goals, Constraints, and Transparently Fair Assignments: A Field Study of Randomization Design in the UEFA Champions League," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3474-3491, June.
    10. Pan-Yang Su & Chinmay Maheshwari & Victoria Tuck & Shankar Sastry, 2024. "Incentive-Compatible Vertiport Reservation in Advanced Air Mobility: An Auction-Based Approach," Papers 2403.18166, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    11. Shen, Ching-Cheng & Yeh, Chien-Chi & Lin, Chun-Nan, 2022. "Using the perspective of business information technology technicians to explore how information technology affects business competitive advantage," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Yan & Dalmau, Ramon & Melgosa, Marc & Montlaur, Adeline & Prats, Xavier, 2020. "A framework for collaborative air traffic flow management minimizing costs for airspace users: Enabling trajectory options and flexible pre-tactical delay management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 229-255.
    2. Murça, Mayara Condé Rocha, 2018. "Collaborative air traffic flow management: Incorporating airline preferences in rerouting decisions," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 97-107.
    3. Diao, Xudong & Chen, Chun-Hsien, 2018. "A sequence model for air traffic flow management rerouting problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 15-30.
    4. Chen, Yunxiang & Zhao, Yifei & Wu, Yexin, 2024. "Recent progress in air traffic flow management: A review," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Pellegrini, Paola & Rodriguez, Joaquin, 2013. "Single European Sky and Single European Railway Area: A system level analysis of air and rail transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 64-86.
    6. Alexander S. Estes & Michael O. Ball, 2020. "Equity and Strength in Stochastic Integer Programming Models for the Dynamic Single Airport Ground-Holding Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 944-955, July.
    7. Guo, Yechenfeng & Hu, Minghua & Zou, Bo & Hansen, Mark & Zhang, Ying & Xie, Hua, 2022. "Air Traffic Flow Management Integrating Separation Management and Ground Holding: An Efficiency-Equity Bi-objective Perspective," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 394-423.
    8. Thomas W. M. Vossen & Michael O. Ball, 2006. "Slot Trading Opportunities in Collaborative Ground Delay Programs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 29-43, February.
    9. Mukherjee, Avijit, 2004. "Dynamic Stochastic Optimization Models for Air Traffic Flow Management," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt2vk8w6nc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    10. Kammoun, Mohamed Ali & Rezg, Nidhal, 2018. "An efficient hybrid approach for resolving the aircraft routing and rescheduling problem," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 73-87.
    11. Bolić, Tatjana & Castelli, Lorenzo & Corolli, Luca & Scaini, Giovanni, 2021. "Flexibility in strategic flight planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Cynthia Barnhart & Dimitris Bertsimas & Constantine Caramanis & Douglas Fearing, 2012. "Equitable and Efficient Coordination in Traffic Flow Management," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 262-280, May.
    13. Dimitris Bertsimas & Sarah Stock Patterson, 2000. "The Traffic Flow Management Rerouting Problem in Air Traffic Control: A Dynamic Network Flow Approach," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 239-255, August.
    14. Balázs Kotnyek & Octavio Richetta, 2006. "Equitable Models for the Stochastic Ground-Holding Problem Under Collaborative Decision Making," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 133-146, May.
    15. Avijit Mukherjee & Mark Hansen, 2007. "A Dynamic Stochastic Model for the Single Airport Ground Holding Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 444-456, November.
    16. Karsu, Özlem & Morton, Alec, 2015. "Inequity averse optimization in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(2), pages 343-359.
    17. Dixit, Aasheesh & Jakhar, Suresh Kumar, 2021. "Airport capacity management: A review and bibliometric analysis," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. Bard, Jonathan F. & Mohan, Dinesh Natarajan, 2008. "Reallocating arrival slots during a ground delay program," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 113-134, February.
    19. Mohamed Ali Kammoun & Sadok Turki & Nidhal Rezg, 2020. "Optimization of Flight Rescheduling Problem under Carbon Tax," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Guglielmo Lulli & Amedeo Odoni, 2007. "The European Air Traffic Flow Management Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 431-443, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:50:y:2016:i:1:p:57-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.