IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v6y1995i6p687-692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fear and Loathing in Organization Studies

Author

Listed:
  • John Van Maanen

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • John Van Maanen, 1995. "Fear and Loathing in Organization Studies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(6), pages 687-692, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:6:p:687-692
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.6.6.687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.6.687
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.6.6.687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfred Kieser, 2007. "Entwicklung von Organisationstheorien als Zeitgeistphänomen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 59(6), pages 678-705, September.
    2. Shaker A. Zahra & Lance R. Newey, 2009. "Maximizing the Impact of Organization Science: Theory‐Building at the Intersection of Disciplines and/or Fields," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(6), pages 1059-1075, September.
    3. Anita Williams Woolley & Erica Fuchs, 2011. "PERSPECTIVE---Collective Intelligence in the Organization of Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1359-1367, October.
    4. Ellson, Tony, 2008. "Can we live without a dog? Consumption life cycles in dog-owner relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 565-573, May.
    5. Guénin, Henri & Gendron, Yves & Morales, Jérémy, 2024. "The diktat of concision: When accounting for words shrinks academic knowledge," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Saunders, Mark N.K. & Bezzina, Frank, 2015. "Reflections on conceptions of research methodology among management academics," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 297-304.
    7. William B. Gartner, 2001. "Is There an Elephant in Entrepreneurship? Blind Assumptions in Theory Development," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 25(4), pages 27-39, July.
    8. Woo, Su-Han & Pettit, Stephen J. & Kwak, Dong-Wook & Beresford, Anthony K.C., 2011. "Seaport research: A structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 667-685, August.
    9. Apostolos Ballas & Vasilis Theoharakis, 2003. "Exploring Diversity in Accounting through Faculty Journal Perceptions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 619-644, December.
    10. Joel A. C. Baum, 2011. "European and North American Approaches to Organizations and Strategy Research: An Atlantic Divide? Not," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1663-1679, December.
    11. Michael J. Ashworth & Kathleen M. Carley, 2007. "Can tools help unify organization theory? Perspectives on the state of computational modeling," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 89-111, March.
    12. Jennifer A. Chatman & Francis J. Flynn, 2005. "Full-Cycle Micro-Organizational Behavior Research," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 434-447, August.
    13. Tae Wan Kim & Thomas Donaldson, 2018. "Rethinking Right: Moral Epistemology in Management Research," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 5-20, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:6:y:1995:i:6:p:687-692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.