IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v23y2012i5p1448-1466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Barrett

    (Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1AG, United Kingdom)

  • Eivor Oborn

    (School of Management, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW2 0EX, United Kingdom)

  • Wanda J. Orlikowski

    (MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

  • JoAnne Yates

    (MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

Abstract

Robotics is a rapidly expanding area of digital innovation with important implications for organizational practice in multioccupational settings. This paper explores the influence of robotic innovations on the boundary dynamics of three different occupational groups—pharmacists, technicians, and assistants—working in a hospital pharmacy. We extend Pickering's tuning approach [Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science . University of Chicago Press, Chicago] to examine the temporally emergent process that entangled the mechanical elements and digital inscriptions of a dispensing robot with the everyday practices of hospital pharmacy work. We found that engagement with the robot's hybrid and dynamic materiality over time reconfigured boundary relations among the three occupational groups, with important and contradictory consequences for the pharmacy workers' skills, jurisdictions, status, and visibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Barrett & Eivor Oborn & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2012. "Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1448-1466, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:1448-1466
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0639
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.1100.0639?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yves Gendron & Michael Barrett, 2004. "Professionalization in Action: Accountants' Attempt at Building a Network of Support for the WebTrust Seal of Assurance," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 563-602, September.
    2. Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Youngjin Yoo, 2007. "Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(4), pages 631-647, August.
    3. Paul S. Adler & Bryan Borys, 1989. "Automation and Skill: Three Generations of Research on the NC Case," Politics & Society, , vol. 17(3), pages 377-402, September.
    4. Paul R. Carlile, 2002. "A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 442-455, August.
    5. Phillip Ein-Dor & Eli Segev, 1993. "A Classification of Information Systems: Analysis and Interpretation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 166-204, June.
    6. Jonny Holmstrom & Marie-Claude Boudreau, 2006. "Communicating and Coordinating: Occasions for Information Technology in Loosely Coupled Organizations," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 19(4), pages 23-38, October.
    7. Michael Barrett & Geoff Walsham, 1999. "Electronic Trading and Work Transformation in the London Insurance Market," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Becker, Markus C. & Rullani, Francesco & Zirpoli, Francesco, 2021. "The role of digital artefacts in early stages of distributed innovation processes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    2. Uri Gal & Tina Blegind Jensen & Kalle Lyytinen, 2014. "Identity Orientation, Social Exchange, and Information Technology Use in Interorganizational Collaborations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1372-1390, October.
    3. Thierry Isckia & Mark de Reuver & Denis Lescop, 2020. "Orchestrating platform ecosystems : the interplay of innovation and business development subsystems," Post-Print hal-02548106, HAL.
    4. Youngjin Yoo & Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Ann Majchrzak, 2012. "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1398-1408, October.
    5. Geiger, Susi & Finch, John, 2016. "Making incremental innovation tradable in industrial service settings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2463-2470.
    6. Samer Faraj & Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa & Ann Majchrzak, 2011. "Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1224-1239, October.
    7. Shaker A. Zahra & Satish Nambisan, 2011. "Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 1(1), pages 4-17, March.
    8. Hall, Matthew & Mikes, Anette & Millo, Yuval, 2015. "How do risk managers become influential?: a field study of toolmaking in two financial institutions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60485, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Robert D. Austin & Lee Devin & Erin E. Sullivan, 2012. "Accidental Innovation: Supporting Valuable Unpredictability in the Creative Process," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1505-1522, October.
    10. Aljona Zorina & William H. Dutton, 2021. "Theorizing Actor Interactions Shaping Innovation in Digital Infrastructures: The Case of Residential Internet Development in Belarus," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 156-180, January.
    11. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2008. "The entanglement of technology and work in organizations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 33898, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Caccamo, Marta & Pittino, Daniel & Tell, Fredrik, 2023. "Boundary objects, knowledge integration, and innovation management: A systematic review of the literature," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    13. Joe Nandhakumar & Nikiforos S. Panourgias & Harry Scarbrough, 2013. "From Knowing It to “Getting It”: Envisioning Practices in Computer Games Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 933-955, December.
    14. Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 941-957, December.
    15. Pier Vittorio Mannucci, 2017. "Drawing Snow White and Animating Buzz Lightyear: Technological Toolkit Characteristics and Creativity in Cross-Disciplinary Teams," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 711-728, August.
    16. Victor P. Seidel & Siobhán O’Mahony, 2014. "Managing the Repertoire: Stories, Metaphors, Prototypes, and Concept Coherence in Product Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 691-712, June.
    17. Anne-Laure Fayard & Emmanouil Gkeredakis & Natalia Levina, 2016. "Framing Innovation Opportunities While Staying Committed to an Organizational Epistemic Stance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 302-323, June.
    18. Abayomi Baiyere & Varun Grover & Kalle J. Lyytinen & Stephanie Woerner & Alok Gupta, 2023. "Digital “x”—Charting a Path for Digital-Themed Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 463-486, June.
    19. Meinel, Martin & Eismann, Tobias T. & Baccarella, Christian V. & Fixson, Sebastian K. & Voigt, Kai-Ingo, 2020. "Does applying design thinking result in better new product concepts than a traditional innovation approach? An experimental comparison study," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 661-671.
    20. Michael Kaethler, 2019. "Curating creative communities of practice: the role of ambiguity," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:23:y:2012:i:5:p:1448-1466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.