IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v12y2001i3p372-388.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Interorganizational Cooperation: Public-Private Collaboration in Regulating Financial Market Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Sue R. Faerman

    (Department of Public Administration and Policy, University at Albany SUNY, 135 Western Avenue, Albany, New York 12222)

  • David P. McCaffrey

    (Department of Public Administration and Policy, University at Albany SUNY, 135 Western Avenue, Albany, New York 12222)

  • David M. Van Slyke

    (Department of Public Administration and Urban Studies, Andrew Young School of Public Policy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303)

Abstract

This paper examines how a collaborative effort between the private and public sectors, called the Derivatives Policy Group (DPG), helped shape current regulation of financial innovation. In 1994 and 1995, this group of six large financial firms developed procedures for risk management, internal controls, and reporting for largely unregulated areas of finance, in cooperation with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The process succeeded despite strong competition among the firms themselves and incentives for both the public and private sectors to resort to adversarial lobbying and legal challenges. The Derivatives Policy Group was a path-setting event in the development of flexible regulation of financial innovation that is now the norm for related policy making.The case is important in and of itself--the financial markets are a major concern of national and international economic policy--but here we treat it as an instance of a larger class of problems. Organizational science constantly encounters settings that involve numerous participants who compete or have histories of conflicts; who are interdependent, and collectively would gain (and even individually gain long term) by cooperating rather than competing on an issue; who fall under different governance systems; and who try as a group to design rules and principles governing their behavior. Four factors appear repeatedly in the research on the success or failure of such arrangements. These are (1) the initial dispositions toward cooperation, (2) the extant issues and incentives, (3) leadership, and (4) the number and variety of organizations involved. This paper focuses on how these factors shaped the development and consequences of the Derivatives Policy Group, and the general implications of this process for interorganizational cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sue R. Faerman & David P. McCaffrey & David M. Van Slyke, 2001. "Understanding Interorganizational Cooperation: Public-Private Collaboration in Regulating Financial Market Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 372-388, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:12:y:2001:i:3:p:372-388
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.12.3.372.10099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.3.372.10099
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.12.3.372.10099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rikard Larsson & Lars Bengtsson & Kristina Henriksson & Judith Sparks, 1998. "The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 285-305, June.
    2. Haas, Peter M., 1992. "Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(1), pages 1-35, January.
    3. Akbar Zaheer & Bill McEvily & Vincenzo Perrone, 1998. "Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(2), pages 141-159, April.
    4. David P. McCaffrey & Sue R. Faerman & David W. Hart, 1995. "The Appeal and Difficulties of Participative Systems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(6), pages 603-627, December.
    5. Frances Westley & Harrie Vredenburg, 1997. "Interorganizational Collaboration and the Preservation of Global Biodiversity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 381-403, August.
    6. Africa Ariño & José de la Torre, 1998. "Learning from Failure: Towards an Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 306-325, June.
    7. Rajesh Kumar & Kofi O. Nti, 1998. "Differential Learning and Interaction in Alliance Dynamics: A Process and Outcome Discrepancy Model," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 356-367, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ignacio J. Martinez-Moyano & David P. McCaffrey & Rogelio Oliva, 2014. "Drift and Adjustment in Organizational Rule Compliance: Explaining the “Regulatory Pendulum” in Financial Markets," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 321-338, April.
    2. Dilesha Nawadali Rathnayake & Jiang Dan & Pierre Axel Louemb & Otek Ntsama Ursule Yvanna, 2021. "How Does Internet Finance Influence the Monetary Policy? Evidence from China," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 94-100.
    3. Bigdeli, Alinaghi Ziaee & Kamal, Muhammad Mustafa & de Cesare, Sergio, 2013. "Electronic information sharing in local government authorities: Factors influencing the decision-making process," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 816-830.
    4. Viktor Květoň & Petr Horák, 2024. "Firms’ Supply Chain Integration, R&D Collaboration, and Impact on Competitiveness: Evidence from Czechia," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 5817-5840, June.
    5. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    6. Omar D. Peña N., 2004. "La educación superior en Colombia y la teoría de los costos de transacción política," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 6(11), pages 97-134, July-Dece.
    7. Amanda Murdie, 2014. "Scrambling for contact: The determinants of inter-NGO cooperation in non-Western countries," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 309-331, September.
    8. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2020. "Towards a servitization of innovation networks: a mapping," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(9), pages 1368-1397, July.
    9. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2019. "Towards a servitization of innovation networks: from traditional innovation networks to public service innovation networks for social innovation," Post-Print halshs-03177975, HAL.
    10. Raquel Sanchis & Maria Rosa Sanchis-Gisbert & Raul Poler, 2020. "Conceptualisation of the Three-Dimensional Matrix of Collaborative Knowledge Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Isabella M. Nolte & Eric C. Martin & Silke Boenigk, 2011. "Cross-Sectoral Coordination of Disaster Relief," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 707-730, August.
    12. Garret Kent Fellows & Jennifer Winter & Alaz Munzur, 2023. "An Analysis of Industrial Policy Mechanisms to Support Commercial Deployment of Bitumen Partial Upgrading in Alberta," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-49, March.
    13. Oliver Henk, 2020. "Internal control through the lens of institutional work: a systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 239-273, September.
    14. Henry Adobor, 2012. "Ethical Issues in Outsourcing: The Case of Contract Medical Research and the Global Pharmaceutical Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 105(2), pages 239-255, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akbar Zaheer & Exequiel Hernandez & Sanjay Banerjee, 2010. "Prior Alliances with Targets and Acquisition Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Industries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 1072-1091, October.
    2. Elodie Gardet & Pierre-Laurent Felix, 2013. "Methods for distributing results in exploratory partnerships," Post-Print hal-01287002, HAL.
    3. Hans Berends & Elco van Burg & Erik M. van Raaij, 2011. "Contacts and Contracts: Cross-Level Network Dynamics in the Development of an Aircraft Material," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 940-960, August.
    4. Ariño, Africa & de la Torre, Jose & Ring, Peter S., 2001. "Roles played by relational trust in strategic alliances," IESE Research Papers D/432, IESE Business School.
    5. Müller, Dirk, 2010. "Alliance Coordination, Dysfunctions, and the Protection of Idiosyncratic Knowledge in Strategic Learning Alliances," EconStor Preprints 41039, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. T. Ravichandran & Simona Ileana Giura, 2019. "Knowledge Transfers in Alliances: Exploring the Facilitating Role of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 726-744, September.
    7. Ziggers, Gerrit Willem & Tjemkes, Brian, 2010. "Dynamics in Inter‐Firm Collaboration: The Impact of Alliance Capabilities on Performance," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 1(2), pages 1-16.
    8. Stienstra, Miranda, 2020. "The determinants and performance implications of alliance partner acquisition," Other publications TiSEM 7fdee0c2-d4d2-4f5b-95e3-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Reuer, Jeffrey J. & Ariño, Africa, 2003. "Alliance dynamics for entrepreneurial firms," IESE Research Papers D/526, IESE Business School.
    10. Yadong Luo, 2007. "Private control and collective control in international joint ventures," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 531-566, October.
    11. Thorgren, Sara & Wincent, Joakim & Eriksson, Jessica, 2011. "Too small or too large to trust your partners in multipartner alliances? The role of effort in initiating generalized exchanges," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 99-112, March.
    12. Max J. Ringlstetter & Benjamin Klein & Björn Schäfer, 2014. "Interorganisationale Kooperationsfähigkeit in der Praxis — Zentraler Baustein zur Sicherung der Zukunftsfähigkeit von Unternehmen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 66(68), pages 123-146, January.
    13. Hsieh, Linda H.Y. & Rodrigues, Suzana B. & Child, John, 2010. "Risk perception and post-formation governance in international joint ventures in Taiwan: The perspective of the foreign partner," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 288-303, September.
    14. Matthew J. Robson & Constantine S. Katsikeas & Daniel C. Bello, 2008. "Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Trust in International Strategic Alliances: The Role of Organizational Complexity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 647-665, August.
    15. Noorderhaven, Niels, 2000. "Hermeneutic methodology and international management research," Occasional Papers 2000/2, Uppsala University, Department of Business Studies.
    16. Martinez-Noya, Andrea & Narula, Rajneesh, 2018. "What more can we learn from R&D alliances? : A review and research agenda," MERIT Working Papers 2018-022, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    17. Heimeriks, K. & Duysters, G.M. & Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M., 2004. "The evolution of alliance capabilities," Working Papers 04.20, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    18. Lumineau, Fabrice & Frechet, Marc & Puthod, Dominique, 2011. "An organizational learning perspective on contract design," MPRA Paper 38360, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Minna Halme, 2001. "Learning for sustainable development in tourism networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 100-114, March.
    20. Akie Iriyama & Weilei Shi & John Prescott, 2014. "Frequency and directional reversal of equity ownership change in international joint ventures," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 215-243, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:12:y:2001:i:3:p:372-388. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.