IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v53y2005i3p477-489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fictitious Play Approach to Large-Scale Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Theodore J. Lambert

    (Mathematics Department, Truckee Meadows Community College, 7000 Dandini Boulevard, Vista B200, Reno, Nevada 89512)

  • Marina A. Epelman

    (Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, 1205 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

  • Robert L. Smith

    (Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, 1205 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the properties of the sampled version of the fictitious play algorithm, familiar from game theory, for games with identical payoffs, and propose a heuristic based on fictitious play as a solution procedure for discrete optimization problems of the form max{ u ( y ): y = ( y 1 ,…, y n ) ∈ (Y-script) 1 ×⋯×(Y-script) n }, i.e., in which the feasible region is a Cartesian product of finite sets (Y-script) i , i ∈ N = {1,…, n }. The contributions of this paper are twofold. In the first part of the paper, we broaden the existing results on convergence properties of the fictitious play algorithm on games with identical payoffs to include an approximate fictitious play algorithm that allows for errors in players’ best replies. Moreover, we introduce sampling-based approximate fictitious play that possesses the above convergence properties, and at the same time provides a computationally efficient method for implementing fictitious play. In the second part of the paper, we motivate the use of algorithms based on sampled fictitious play to solve optimization problems in the above form with particular focus on the problems in which the objective function u (·) comes from a “black box,” such as a simulation model, where significant computational effort is required for each function evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Theodore J. Lambert & Marina A. Epelman & Robert L. Smith, 2005. "A Fictitious Play Approach to Large-Scale Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 477-489, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:53:y:2005:i:3:p:477-489
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1040.0178
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1040.0178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Garcia, Alfredo & Reaume, Daniel & Smith, Robert L., 2000. "Fictitious play for finding system optimal routings in dynamic traffic networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 147-156, February.
    2. Monderer, Dov & Shapley, Lloyd S., 1996. "Fictitious Play Property for Games with Identical Interests," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 68(1), pages 258-265, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Swenson, Brian & Murray, Ryan & Kar, Soummya, 2020. "Regular potential games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 432-453.
    2. Enrique Campos-Nañez & Alfredo Garcia & Chenyang Li, 2008. "A Game-Theoretic Approach to Efficient Power Management in Sensor Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 552-561, June.
    3. Paul Goldberg & Rahul Savani & Troels Sørensen & Carmine Ventre, 2013. "On the approximation performance of fictitious play in finite games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1059-1083, November.
    4. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "The reliability importance of components and prime implicants in coherent and non-coherent systems including total-order interactions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 485-495, August.
    5. E. Borgonovo & C. L. Smith, 2011. "A Study of Interactions in the Risk Assessment of Complex Engineering Systems: An Application to Space PSA," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(6), pages 1461-1476, December.
    6. Alfredo Garcia & Stephen D. Patek & Kaushik Sinha, 2007. "A Decentralized Approach to Discrete Optimization via Simulation: Application to Network Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 717-732, August.
    7. Li, Zifan & Tewari, Ambuj, 2018. "Sampled fictitious play is Hannan consistent," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 401-412.
    8. Marden, Jason R. & Shamma, Jeff S., 2015. "Game Theory and Distributed Control****Supported AFOSR/MURI projects #FA9550-09-1-0538 and #FA9530-12-1-0359 and ONR projects #N00014-09-1-0751 and #N0014-12-1-0643," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,, Elsevier.
    9. Ziyou Gao & Yunchao Qu & Xingang Li & Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang, 2014. "Simulating the Dynamic Escape Process in Large Public Places," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1344-1357, December.
    10. Berger, Ulrich, 2007. "Two more classes of games with the continuous-time fictitious play property," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 247-261, August.
    11. Irina S. Dolinskaya & Marina A. Epelman & Esra Şişikoğlu Sir & Robert L. Smith, 2016. "Parameter-Free Sampled Fictitious Play for Solving Deterministic Dynamic Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 631-655, May.
    12. Onur Şeref & J. Paul Brooks & Bernice Huang & Stephen S. Fong, 2017. "Enumeration and Cartesian Product Decomposition of Alternate Optimal Fluxes in Cellular Metabolism," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 197-210, May.
    13. Gunawan, Aldy & Lau, Hoong Chuin & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2016. "Orienteering Problem: A survey of recent variants, solution approaches and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(2), pages 315-332.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berger, Ulrich, 2005. "Fictitious play in 2 x n games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 139-154, February.
    2. Swenson, Brian & Murray, Ryan & Kar, Soummya, 2020. "Regular potential games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 432-453.
    3. Ulrich Berger, 2004. "Two More Classes of Games with the Fictitious Play Property," Game Theory and Information 0408003, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Enrique Campos-Nañez & Alfredo Garcia & Chenyang Li, 2008. "A Game-Theoretic Approach to Efficient Power Management in Sensor Networks," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 552-561, June.
    5. Alfredo Garcia & Stephen D. Patek & Kaushik Sinha, 2007. "A Decentralized Approach to Discrete Optimization via Simulation: Application to Network Flow," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 717-732, August.
    6. Ulrich Berger, 2004. "Some Notes on Learning in Games with Strategic Complementarities," Game Theory and Information 0409001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Irina S. Dolinskaya & Marina A. Epelman & Esra Şişikoğlu Sir & Robert L. Smith, 2016. "Parameter-Free Sampled Fictitious Play for Solving Deterministic Dynamic Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(2), pages 631-655, May.
    8. Anthonisen, Niels, 1997. "On the Convergence of Beliefs within Populations in Games with Learning," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 169-184, September.
    9. Benaïm, Michel & Hofbauer, Josef & Hopkins, Ed, 2009. "Learning in games with unstable equilibria," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(4), pages 1694-1709, July.
    10. Rossella Argenziano & Itzhak Gilboa, 2012. "History as a coordination device," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 501-512, October.
    11. Hopkins, Ed, 1999. "Learning, Matching, and Aggregation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 79-110, January.
    12. Sobel, Joel, 2000. "Economists' Models of Learning," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 241-261, October.
    13. Jiequn Han & Ruimeng Hu & Jihao Long, 2020. "Convergence of Deep Fictitious Play for Stochastic Differential Games," Papers 2008.05519, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    14. Monderer, Dov & Sela, Aner, 1997. "Fictitious play and- no-cycling conditions," Sonderforschungsbereich 504 Publications 97-12, Sonderforschungsbereich 504, Universität Mannheim;Sonderforschungsbereich 504, University of Mannheim.
    15. Stefanos Leonardos & Costis Melolidakis, 2018. "On the Commitment Value and Commitment Optimal Strategies in Bimatrix Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(03), pages 1-28, September.
    16. In, Younghwan, 2014. "Fictitious play property of the Nash demand game," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 408-412.
    17. Hon-Snir, Shlomit & Monderer, Dov & Sela, Aner, 1998. "A Learning Approach to Auctions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 65-88, September.
    18. Joseph Abdou & Nikolaos Pnevmatikos & Marco Scarsini, 2014. "Uniformity and games decomposition," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 14084r, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, revised Mar 2017.
    19. Ding, Zhanwen & Wang, Qiao & Cai, Chaoying & Jiang, Shumin, 2014. "Fictitious play with incomplete learning," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-8.
    20. Jacques Durieu & Philippe Solal, 2012. "Models of Adaptive Learning in Game Theory," Chapters, in: Richard Arena & Agnès Festré & Nathalie Lazaric (ed.), Handbook of Knowledge and Economics, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:53:y:2005:i:3:p:477-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.