IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v48y2000i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Commonality in Component Design

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich W. Thonemann

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 93405-4024)

  • Margaret L. Brandeau

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 93405-4024)

Abstract

Increased competition and more demanding customers have forced companies to offer a wide variety of products. Component commonality can help companies reduce the cost of providing product variety to their customers. However, determining the extent to which component commonality should be used is difficult. In this paper we present an approach to determine the optimal level of component commonality for end-product components that do not differentiate models from the customer's perspective. The work was inspired by and applied to a wire-harness design problem faced by a major automobile manufacturer. We model the component design problem as a mathematical program that considers production, inventory holding, setup, and complexity costs (the cost in indirect functions caused by component variety). We develop two approaches to solve the problem: a branch-and-bound algorithm that can solve small- and medium-size problems optimally, and a simulated annealing algorithm that can solve large-size problems heuristically. We apply both algorithms to the wireharness design problem faced by the automobile manufacturer and to a number of randomly generated test problems. We show that an optimal design achieves high cost savings by using significantly fewer variants than a no-commonality design but significantly more variants than a full-commonality design. We apply sensitivity analysis to identify extreme conditions under which the no-commonality and full-commonality designs perform well, and we identify the key cost drivers for our application. Finally, we describe the impact of our analysis on the company's subsequent component design decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich W. Thonemann & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2000. "Optimal Commonality in Component Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.1.1.12445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.48.1.1.12445
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.48.1.1.12445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lawrence Dale Thomas, 1991. "Commonality Analysis Using Clustering Methods," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 677-680, August.
    2. John O. McClain & William L. Maxwell & John A. Muckstadt & L. Joseph Thomas & Elliott N. Weiss, 1984. "Note---Comment on "Aggregate Safety Stock Levels and Component Part Commonality"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 772-773, June.
    3. David W. Pentico, 1974. "The Assortment Problem with Probabilistic Demands," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 286-290, November.
    4. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Sridhar R. Tayur, 1998. "Managing Broader Product Lines through Delayed Differentiation Using Vanilla Boxes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 161-172, December.
    5. Kenneth R. Baker & Michael J. Magazine & Henry L. W. Nuttle, 1986. "The Effect of Commonality on Safety Stock in a Simple Inventory Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(8), pages 982-988, August.
    6. David A. Collier, 1982. "Aggregate Safety Stock Levels and Component Part Commonality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(11), pages 1296-1303, November.
    7. Yigal Gerchak & Michael J. Magazine & A. Bruce Gamble, 1988. "Component Commonality with Service Level Requirements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 753-760, June.
    8. M. L. Wolfson, 1965. "Selecting the Best Lengths to Stock," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(4), pages 570-585, August.
    9. Connolly, David T., 1990. "An improved annealing scheme for the QAP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 93-100, May.
    10. David W. Pentico, 1976. "The Assortment Problem with Nonlinear Cost Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 1129-1142, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. C. Arbib & F. Marinelli, 2009. "Exact and Asymptotically Exact Solutions for a Class of Assortment Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 13-25, February.
    2. Thyssen, Jesper & Israelsen, Poul & Jorgensen, Brian, 2006. "Activity-based costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization--A case study and beyond," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 252-270, September.
    3. Li, Xingyu & Epureanu, Bogdan I., 2020. "An agent-based approach to optimizing modular vehicle fleet operation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Saif Benjaafar & Yanzhi Li & Dongsheng Xu & Samir Elhedhli, 2008. "Demand Allocation in Systems with Multiple Inventory Locations and Multiple Demand Sources," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 43-60, October.
    5. Thyssen, Jesper & Israelsen, Poul & Jørgensen, Brian, 2005. "Activity Based Costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization - a case study and beyond," Management Accounting Research Group Working Papers M-2005-04, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    6. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2004. "Note--Commonality Strategies: Value Drivers and Equivalence with Flexible Capacity and Inventory Substitution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 419-424, March.
    7. Zhu, Qingyun & Shah, Purvi & Sarkis, Joseph, 2018. "Addition by subtraction: Integrating product deletion with lean and sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 201-214.
    8. Israelsen, Poul & Jørgensen, Brian, 2011. "Decentralizing decision making in modularization strategies: Overcoming barriers from dysfunctional accounting systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 453-462, June.
    9. Brun, Alessandro & Capra, Eugenio & Miragliotta, Giovanni, 2009. "VRP revisited: The impact of behavioural costs in balancing standardisation and variety," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 16-29, January.
    10. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger & Schepens, Luc, 2008. "Analysis of an industrial component commonality problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 801-811, April.
    11. Olivier Briant & Denis Naddef, 2004. "The Optimal Diversity Management Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 515-526, August.
    12. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Ruiz-Hernández, Diego & Guimaraes, Renato, 2016. "The component commonality problem in a real multidimensional space: An algorithmic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 105-116.
    13. Jiri Chod & David Pyke & Nils Rudi, 2010. "The Value of Flexibility in Make-to-Order Systems: The Effect of Demand Correlation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 834-848, August.
    14. Wang, Tai-Yue & Hu, Jui-Ming, 2008. "An inventory control system for products with optional components under service level and budget constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 41-58, August.
    15. Tallys H. Yunes & Dominic Napolitano & Alan Scheller-Wolf & Sridhar Tayur, 2007. "Building Efficient Product Portfolios at John Deere and Company," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 615-629, August.
    16. Baud-Lavigne, Bertrand & Agard, Bruno & Penz, Bernard, 2016. "Simultaneous product family and supply chain design: An optimization approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 111-118.
    17. Jing-Sheng Song & Yao Zhao, 2009. "The Value of Component Commonality in a Dynamic Inventory System with Lead Times," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 493-508, March.
    18. Langenberg, Kerstin U. & Seifert, Ralf W. & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2012. "Aligning supply chain portfolios with product portfolios," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 500-513.
    19. Eva Labro, 2004. "The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 358-367, June.
    20. Pentico, David W., 2008. "The assortment problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 295-309, October.
    21. Vié, Marie-Sklaerder & Zufferey, Nicolas & Cordeau, Jean-François, 2019. "Solving the Wire-Harness Design Problem at a European car manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 712-724.
    22. Joon-Seok Kim & Saif Benjaafar, 2002. "On the Benefits of Inventory-Pooling in Production-Inventory Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 4(1), pages 12-16.
    23. Kamalini Ramdas & Taylor Randall, 2008. "Does Component Sharing Help or Hurt Reliability? An Empirical Study in the Automotive Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 922-938, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2004. "Note--Commonality Strategies: Value Drivers and Equivalence with Flexible Capacity and Inventory Substitution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 419-424, March.
    2. Droge, Cornelia & Vickery, Shawnee K. & Jacobs, Mark A., 2012. "Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 250-262.
    3. Stephen A. Smith & Narendra Agrawal, 2000. "Management of Multi-Item Retail Inventory Systems with Demand Substitution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 50-64, February.
    4. Eva Labro, 2004. "The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 358-367, June.
    5. Narendra Agrawal & Stephen A. Smith, 2003. "Optimal retail assortments for substitutable items purchased in sets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(7), pages 793-822, October.
    6. Jans, Raf & Degraeve, Zeger & Schepens, Luc, 2008. "Analysis of an industrial component commonality problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 801-811, April.
    7. Mark S. Hillier, 1999. "Product commonality in multiple‐period, make‐to‐stock systems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(6), pages 737-751, September.
    8. Hsieh, Ying-Jiun, 2011. "Demand switching criteria for multiple products: An inventory cost analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 130-137, April.
    9. Hillier, Mark S., 2002. "Using commonality as backup safety stock," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 353-365, January.
    10. Alfaro, José A. & Corbett, Charles J., 2000. "The value of SKU rationalization: the pooling effect under suboptimal inventory policies," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB 9917, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    11. Jing-Sheng Song & Yao Zhao, 2009. "The Value of Component Commonality in a Dynamic Inventory System with Lead Times," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 493-508, March.
    12. Jeet, Vishv & Kutanoglu, Erhan, 2018. "Part commonality effects on integrated network design and inventory models for low-demand service parts logistics systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 46-58.
    13. Brun, Alessandro & Capra, Eugenio & Miragliotta, Giovanni, 2009. "VRP revisited: The impact of behavioural costs in balancing standardisation and variety," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 16-29, January.
    14. Albert Y. Ha, 2000. "Stock Rationing in an M/E k /1 Make-to-Stock Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(1), pages 77-87, January.
    15. Ma, Shihua & Wang, Wei & Liu, Liming, 2002. "Commonality and postponement in multistage assembly systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(3), pages 523-538, November.
    16. Narendra Agrawal & Morris A. Cohen, 2001. "Optimal material control in an assembly system with component commonality," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(5), pages 409-429, August.
    17. Mohebbi, E. & Choobineh, F., 2005. "The impact of component commonality in an assemble-to-order environment under supply and demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 472-482, December.
    18. Susan H. Xu & Zhaolin Li, 2007. "Managing a Single-Product Assemble-to-Order System with Technology Innovations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(9), pages 1467-1485, September.
    19. Pentico, David W., 2008. "The assortment problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 295-309, October.
    20. Tibben-Lembke, Ronald S. & Bassok, Yehuda, 2005. "An inventory model for delayed customization: A hybrid approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 748-764, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:48:y:2000:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.