IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v189y2008i1p41-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An inventory control system for products with optional components under service level and budget constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Tai-Yue
  • Hu, Jui-Ming

Abstract

Modularization and customization have made enterprises face the multi-item inventory problems and the interactions among those items. A powerful, affordable information technology system can make the continuous review inventory policy more convenient, efficient, and effective. In this study, a (Q, r) model is developed to find the optimal lot size and reorder point for a multi-item inventory with interactions between necessary and optional components. In order to accurately approximate costs, the service cost is introduced and defined in proportion to the service level. In addition, the service cost and purchasing cost are taken simultaneously, and are treated as a budget constraint for executives to consider because the firm's strategy could influence the choice of service level. The proposed model is formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem, as the service level is nonlinear. Thus, some known procedures are revised to solve this problem and the results are compared with other models. The results show that the revised procedure performs better than the N-R procedure, leading to important insights about inventory control policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Tai-Yue & Hu, Jui-Ming, 2008. "An inventory control system for products with optional components under service level and budget constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 41-58, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:189:y:2008:i:1:p:41-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)00507-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David A. Collier, 1982. "Aggregate Safety Stock Levels and Component Part Commonality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(11), pages 1296-1303, November.
    2. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Michael S. Pangburn & Euthemia Stavrulaki, 2004. ""Stack Them High, Let 'em Fly": Lot-Sizing Policies When Inventories Stimulate Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 630-644, May.
    3. Lawrence Dale Thomas, 1991. "Commonality Analysis Using Clustering Methods," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 677-680, August.
    4. Ernst, Ricardo & Kamrad, Bardia, 2000. "Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 495-510, August.
    5. Urgeletti Tinarelli, Giulia, 1983. "Inventory control: Models and problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, September.
    6. Ghalebsaz-Jeddi, Babak & Shultes, Bruce C. & Haji, Rasoul, 2004. "A multi-product continuous review inventory system with stochastic demand, backorders, and a budget constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 456-469, October.
    7. Lawrence L. Parker, 1964. "Economical reorder quantities and reorder points with uncertain demand," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3‐4), pages 351-358, September.
    8. Ulrich W. Thonemann & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2000. "Optimal Commonality in Component Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 1-19, February.
    9. Bhattacharya, D. K., 2005. "On multi-item inventory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(3), pages 786-791, May.
    10. Chen, Youhua Frank, 2005. "Fractional programming approach to two stochastic inventory problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(1), pages 63-71, January.
    11. Hausman, Warren H. & Lee, Hau L. & Zhang, Alex X., 1998. "Joint demand fulfillment probability in a multi-item inventory system with independent order-up-to policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 646-659, September.
    12. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Sridhar R. Tayur, 1998. "Managing Broader Product Lines through Delayed Differentiation Using Vanilla Boxes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 161-172, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Chang-Yong & Lee, Dongju, 2018. "An efficient method for solving a correlated multi-item inventory system," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 13-21.
    2. Ishfaq, Rafay & Bajwa, Naeem, 2019. "Profitability of online order fulfillment in multi-channel retailing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1028-1040.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jing-Sheng Song & Yao Zhao, 2009. "The Value of Component Commonality in a Dynamic Inventory System with Lead Times," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 493-508, March.
    2. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2004. "Note--Commonality Strategies: Value Drivers and Equivalence with Flexible Capacity and Inventory Substitution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 419-424, March.
    3. Eva Labro, 2004. "The Cost Effects of Component Commonality: A Literature Review Through a Management-Accounting Lens," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(4), pages 358-367, June.
    4. Ulrich W. Thonemann & Margaret L. Brandeau, 2000. "Optimal Commonality in Component Design," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 1-19, February.
    5. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Ruiz-Hernández, Diego & Guimaraes, Renato, 2016. "The component commonality problem in a real multidimensional space: An algorithmic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 105-116.
    6. Lee, Chang-Yong & Lee, Dongju, 2018. "An efficient method for solving a correlated multi-item inventory system," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 13-21.
    7. Willem van Jaarsveld & Alan Scheller-Wolf, 2015. "Optimization of Industrial-Scale Assemble-to-Order Systems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 544-560, August.
    8. Alfaro, José A. & Corbett, Charles J., 2000. "The value of SKU rationalization: the pooling effect under suboptimal inventory policies," DEE - Working Papers. Business Economics. WB 9917, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía de la Empresa.
    9. Chenglin Hu & Junsong Bian & Daozhi Zhao & Longfei He & Fangqi Dong, 2024. "Optimal Dynamic Production Planning for Supply Network with Random External and Internal Demands," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-33, August.
    10. Thyssen, Jesper & Israelsen, Poul & Jørgensen, Brian, 2005. "Activity Based Costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization - a case study and beyond," Management Accounting Research Group Working Papers M-2005-04, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    11. Susan H. Xu & Zhaolin Li, 2007. "Managing a Single-Product Assemble-to-Order System with Technology Innovations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(9), pages 1467-1485, September.
    12. Graman, Gregory A., 2010. "A partial-postponement decision cost model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(1), pages 34-44, February.
    13. Tibben-Lembke, Ronald S. & Bassok, Yehuda, 2005. "An inventory model for delayed customization: A hybrid approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(3), pages 748-764, September.
    14. Tang, Dong, 2011. "Managing finished-goods inventory under capacitated delayed differentiation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 481-492, October.
    15. Kamalini Ramdas & Taylor Randall, 2008. "Does Component Sharing Help or Hurt Reliability? An Empirical Study in the Automotive Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(5), pages 922-938, May.
    16. Droge, Cornelia & Vickery, Shawnee K. & Jacobs, Mark A., 2012. "Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 250-262.
    17. Israelsen, Poul & Jørgensen, Brian, 2011. "Decentralizing decision making in modularization strategies: Overcoming barriers from dysfunctional accounting systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 453-462, June.
    18. Jiri Chod & David Pyke & Nils Rudi, 2010. "The Value of Flexibility in Make-to-Order Systems: The Effect of Demand Correlation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 834-848, August.
    19. Thyssen, Jesper & Israelsen, Poul & Jorgensen, Brian, 2006. "Activity-based costing as a method for assessing the economics of modularization--A case study and beyond," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 252-270, September.
    20. Hsieh, Ying-Jiun, 2011. "Demand switching criteria for multiple products: An inventory cost analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 130-137, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:189:y:2008:i:1:p:41-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.