IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v21y2019i2p417-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ensuring Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Through Vertical Integration and Horizontal Sourcing

Author

Listed:
  • Adem Orsdemir

    (School of Business Administration, University of California, Riverside, California 92521;)

  • Bin Hu

    (Naveen Jindal School of Management, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas 75080;)

  • Vinayak Deshpande

    (Kenan-Flagler Business School, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599)

Abstract

Firms have recently vertically integrated with suppliers to ensure corporate social and environmental responsibility (CSER) in sourcing. We investigate the conditions under which CSER concerns will drive vertical integration, and how actions of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) impact CSER. This paper is inspired by Taylor Guitars’s acquisition of an ebony mill in Cameroon to ensure CSER. Whereas the majority of the responsible sourcing literature focuses on auditing as a mechanism for addressing CSER, we study vertical integration as an alternative. Our analysis confirms that CSER can be a potential driver of vertical integration aside from other well-known drivers. We analyze game-theoretical models where a firm can vertically integrate to potentially eliminate CSER risks. Two innovative features of our models are demand externalities (namely, a firm’s CSER violation can positively or negatively affect its competitor’s demand) and horizontal sourcing (namely, a vertically integrated firm can sell responsibly sourced supply to a competitor). We show that a firm’s CSER strategy depends on the risk of a CSER violation exposure, the level of demand externalities (positive or negative), and whether horizontal sourcing is feasible. We find that in industries where horizontal sourcing is unlikely, firms stay disintegrated under a low CSER violation exposure risk and vertically integrate under a moderate CSER violation exposure risk. Surprisingly, firms may stay disintegrated under a high CSER violation exposure risk combined with strongly negative demand externalities. In contrast, firms vertically integrate under moderate-to-high CSER violation exposure risk when horizontal sourcing is possible but may not share responsibly sourced supply through horizontal sourcing under strongly positive demand externalities. We show that firms should be conscious about demand externalities and the possibility of horizontal sourcing in the industry when considering vertical integration for CSER. We also provide guidance to NGOs interested in promoting CSER. When horizontal sourcing is unlikely, NGOs should specify both violating and nonviolating firms in their reports, but not over-scrutinize firms; whereas when horizontal sourcing is possible, NGOs should allocate more resources for scrutinizing firms’ CSER violations and create industry-wide violation reports, while avoiding naming of specific firms in their reports. This paper has been accepted for the Manufacturing & Service Operations Management Special Issue on Value Chain Innovations in Developing Economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Adem Orsdemir & Bin Hu & Vinayak Deshpande, 2019. "Ensuring Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility Through Vertical Integration and Horizontal Sourcing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 417-434, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:21:y:2019:i:2:p:417-434
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2018.0744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0744
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2018.0744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baron David P & Agus Harjoto Maretno & Jo Hoje, 2011. "The Economics and Politics of Corporate Social Performance," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-48, August.
    2. Ruixue Guo & Hau L. Lee & Robert Swinney, 2016. "Responsible Sourcing in Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(9), pages 2722-2744, September.
    3. Sang-Hyun Kim, 2015. "Time to Come Clean? Disclosure and Inspection Policies for Green Production," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Baron, David P. & Agus Harjoto, Maretno & Jo, Hoje, 2011. "The Economics and Politics of Corporate Social Performance," Business and Politics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(2), pages 1-46, August.
    5. Fu, Qiang & Gong, Jie & Png, I.P.L., 2018. "Law, social responsibility, and outsourcing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 114-146.
    6. Felipe Caro & Prashant Chintapalli & Kumar Rajaram & Chris S. Tang, 2018. "Improving Supplier Compliance Through Joint and Shared Audits with Collective Penalty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 363-380, May.
    7. Bin Hu & Dimitris Kostamis, 2015. "Managing Supply Disruptions when Sourcing from Reliable and Unreliable Suppliers," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(5), pages 808-820, May.
    8. R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), 1989. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    9. Perry, Martin K., 1989. "Vertical integration: Determinants and effects," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 4, pages 183-255, Elsevier.
    10. Erica L. Plambeck & Terry A. Taylor, 2016. "Supplier Evasion of a Buyer’s Audit: Implications for Motivating Supplier Social and Environmental Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 184-197, May.
    11. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2017. "Sourcing Under Supplier Responsibility Risk: The Effects of Certification, Audit, and Contingency Payment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2795-2812, September.
    12. R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), 1989. "Handbook of Industrial Organization," Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 2, number 2.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiayu Chen & Anyan Qi & Milind Dawande, 2020. "Supplier Centrality and Auditing Priority in Socially Responsible Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1199-1214, November.
    2. Ma, Xin & Talluri, Srinivas & Ferguson, Mark & Tiwari, Sunil, 2022. "Strategic production and responsible sourcing decisions under an emissions trading scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1429-1443.
    3. Qi Feng & Chengzhang Li & Mengshi Lu & J. George Shanthikumar, 2022. "Implementing Environmental and Social Responsibility Programs in Supply Networks Through Multiunit Bilateral Negotiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2579-2599, April.
    4. Li Chen & Shiqing Yao & Kaijie Zhu, 2020. "Responsible Sourcing Under Supplier-Auditor Collusion," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1234-1250, November.
    5. Gao, Ruoxin & Yao, Shiqing & Yang, Ruina, 2024. "Responsible audit and consumer awareness under collusion risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 466-476.
    6. Lee, Seungrae & Park, Seung Jae, 2020. "Who should lead carbon emissions reductions? Upstream vs. downstream firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    7. Han Zhang & Goker Aydin & Rodney P. Parker, 2022. "Social Responsibility Auditing in Supply Chain Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1058-1077, February.
    8. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Reveal the Supplier List? A Trade-off in Capacity vs. Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1251-1267, November.
    9. Ryan W. Buell & Basak Kalkanci, 2021. "How Transparency into Internal and External Responsibility Initiatives Influences Consumer Choice," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 932-950, February.
    10. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2020. "Motivating Supplier Social Responsibility Under Incomplete Visibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1268-1286, November.
    11. Tarkan Tan & M. Hakan Akyüz & Bengisu Urlu & Santiago Ruiz, 2024. "Stop Auditing and Start to CARE: Paradigm Shift in Assessing and Improving Supplier Sustainability," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 241-263, May.
    12. Albert Y. Ha & Weixin Shang & Yunjie Wang, 2023. "Supplier Audit Information Sharing and Responsible Sourcing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 308-324, January.
    13. Vibhuti Dhingra & Harish Krishnan, 2021. "Managing Reputation Risk in Supply Chains: The Role of Risk Sharing Under Limited Liability," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4845-4862, August.
    14. Slotnick, Susan A. & Sobel, Matthew J., 2022. "Collaboration with a supplier to induce fair labor practices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 244-258.
    15. Xingyi Yang & Xiaopei Dai & Zhenyu Liu, 2023. "Retailers’ Audit Strategies for Green Agriculture Based on Dynamic Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Guo, Lei & Yin, Haitao & Zhao, Xuan & Zhu, Qinghua, 2022. "Managing your own low-tier suppliers via donation to NGOs: Why do multi-national corporations bother?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    17. Christoph Schlueter-Langdon, 2000. "Information Technology And The Vertical Organization Of Industry," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 174, Society for Computational Economics.
    18. Emanuela Todeva & Ruslan Rakhmatullin, 2016. "Industry Global Value Chains, Connectivity and Regional Smart Specialisation in Europe. An Overview of Theoretical Approaches and Mapping Methodologies," JRC Research Reports JRC102801, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Gert Brunekreeft & David Newbery, 2006. "Should merchant transmission investment be subject to a must-offer provision?," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 233-260, November.
    20. Rajeev K. Goel & Ummad Mazhar & James W. Saunoris, 2021. "Identifying the corrupt cog in the wheel: Dimensions of supply chain logistics and cross‐country corruption," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 693-709, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:21:y:2019:i:2:p:417-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.