IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3261-d1064465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retailers’ Audit Strategies for Green Agriculture Based on Dynamic Evolutionary Game

Author

Listed:
  • Xingyi Yang

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

  • Xiaopei Dai

    (Hunan Key Laboratory of Macroeconomic Big Data Mining and Its Application, School of Business, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Zhenyu Liu

    (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China)

Abstract

Green agriculture can minimize the negative impact of agriculture on the environment, and green products are usually sold at a higher price due to their green attributes. This induces farmers to produce conventional products and falsely sell them as green products. To better promote the development of the green agricultural product market, we study the effect of retailers’ audit strategies, premium policies and farmers’ punishment policy on farmers’ decisions. We develop an evolutionary game theory model to describe evolutionary behaviors of farmers and retailers. Then, we analyze the evolutionary stability strategies in different scenarios and numerically simulate the evolution of farmers’ decisions and retailers’ decisions to verify theoretical results. The results show that the static premium policy is not an ideal policy to promote the development of green agriculture, whereas the dynamic premium policy, as well as the dynamic premium and farmers’ punishment policy, could lead to an effective green market. A higher maximum premium encourages more farmers to produce true green products and may allow more retailers not to audit farmers. Moreover, if the punishment for farmers increases, more retailers will not audit farmers, leading to lower audit cost. Finally, a lower audit fee could motivate more farmers to produce true green products.

Suggested Citation

  • Xingyi Yang & Xiaopei Dai & Zhenyu Liu, 2023. "Retailers’ Audit Strategies for Green Agriculture Based on Dynamic Evolutionary Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3261-:d:1064465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3261/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3261/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alvaro J. Mendoza & Robert T. Clemen, 2013. "Outsourcing sustainability: a game-theoretic modeling approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 224-236, June.
    2. Xin Su & Haolong Liu & Shunqi Hou, 2018. "The Trilateral Evolutionary Game of Agri-Food Quality in Farmer-Supermarket Direct Purchase: A Simulation Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, February.
    3. Zhou, Rui & Bhuiyan, Tanveer Hossain & Medal, Hugh R. & Sherwin, Michael D. & Yang, Dong, 2022. "A stochastic programming model with endogenous uncertainty for selecting supplier development programs to proactively mitigate supplier risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    4. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Tauni, Muhammad Zubair & Zhang, Hongxia & Lirong, Xing, 2022. "Extreme weather events risk to crop-production and the adaptation of innovative management strategies to mitigate the risk: A retrospective survey of rural Punjab, Pakistan," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Shouqiang Wang & Peng Sun & Francis de Véricourt, 2016. "Inducing Environmental Disclosures: A Dynamic Mechanism Design Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 371-389, April.
    6. Kelei Xue & Yongjian Li & Xueping Zhen & Wen Wang, 2020. "Managing the supply disruption risk: option contract or order commitment contract?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 985-1026, August.
    7. Sang-Hyun Kim & Serguei Netessine, 2013. "Collaborative Cost Reduction and Component Procurement Under Information Asymmetry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 189-206, November.
    8. Daniel Friedman, 1998. "On economic applications of evolutionary game theory," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 15-43.
    9. Fan, Ruguo & Dong, Lili, 2018. "The dynamic analysis and simulation of government subsidy strategies in low-carbon diffusion considering the behavior of heterogeneous agents," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 252-262.
    10. Felipe Caro & Prashant Chintapalli & Kumar Rajaram & Chris S. Tang, 2018. "Improving Supplier Compliance Through Joint and Shared Audits with Collective Penalty," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 363-380, May.
    11. Vishal Agrawal & Deishin Lee, 2019. "The Effect of Sourcing Policies on Suppliers’ Sustainable Practices," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(4), pages 767-787, April.
    12. Friedman, Daniel, 1991. "Evolutionary Games in Economics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 637-666, May.
    13. Liu, Dehai & Xiao, Xingzhi & Li, Hongyi & Wang, Weiguo, 2015. "Historical evolution and benefit–cost explanation of periodical fluctuation in coal mine safety supervision: An evolutionary game analysis framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(3), pages 974-984.
    14. Verena Seufert & Navin Ramankutty & Jonathan A. Foley, 2012. "Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7397), pages 229-232, May.
    15. Jessica Aschemann-Witzel & Stephan Zielke, 2017. "Can't Buy Me Green? A Review of Consumer Perceptions of and Behavior Toward the Price of Organic Food," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1), pages 211-251, March.
    16. Joann F. de Zegher & Dan A. Iancu & Hau L. Lee, 2019. "Designing Contracts and Sourcing Channels to Create Shared Value," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 271-289, May.
    17. Chien-Ming Chen & Magali A. Delmas, 2012. "Measuring Eco-Inefficiency: A New Frontier Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1064-1079, October.
    18. Gary H. Chao & Seyed M. R. Iravani & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Quality Improvement Incentives and Product Recall Cost Sharing Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(7), pages 1122-1138, July.
    19. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Reveal the Supplier List? A Trade-off in Capacity vs. Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1251-1267, November.
    20. Xiaojin Liu & Anant Mishra & Susan Goldstein & Kingshuk K. Sinha, 2019. "Toward Improving Factory Working Conditions in Developing Countries: An Empirical Analysis of Bangladesh Ready-Made Garment Factories," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 379-397, May.
    21. Xin Fang & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2020. "Cooperative Approaches to Managing Social Responsibility in a Market with Externalities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1215-1233, November.
    22. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2018. "Supply Chain Visibility and Social Responsibility: Investigating Consumers’ Behaviors and Motives," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 617-636, October.
    23. Sang-Hyun Kim, 2015. "Time to Come Clean? Disclosure and Inspection Policies for Green Production," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 1-20, February.
    24. Christian Schmidt, 2004. "Are evolutionary games another way of thinking about game theory?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 249-262, June.
    25. Wenxue Ran & Teng Xu, 2023. "Low-Carbon Supply Chain Coordination Based on Carbon Tax and Government Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    26. John Cranfield & Spencer Henson & James Holliday, 2010. "The motives, benefits, and problems of conversion to organic production," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 27(3), pages 291-306, September.
    27. Iny Hwang & Suresh Radhakrishnan & Lixin (Nancy) Su, 2006. "Vendor Certification and Appraisal: Implications for Supplier Quality," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(10), pages 1472-1482, October.
    28. Kaniovski Yuri M. & Young H. Peyton, 1995. "Learning Dynamics in Games with Stochastic Perturbations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 330-363, November.
    29. Erica L. Plambeck & Terry A. Taylor, 2016. "Supplier Evasion of a Buyer’s Audit: Implications for Motivating Supplier Social and Environmental Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 184-197, May.
    30. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab, 2022. "Estimating smart energy inputs packages using hybrid optimisation technique to mitigate environmental emissions of commercial fish farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    31. Ying-Ju Chen & J. George Shanthikumar & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Incentive for Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Sharing among Farmers in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(9), pages 1430-1440, September.
    32. Shi Chen & Qinqin Zhang & Yong‐Pin Zhou, 2019. "Impact of Supply Chain Transparency on Sustainability under NGO Scrutiny," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(12), pages 3002-3022, December.
    33. Li Chen & Hau L. Lee, 2017. "Sourcing Under Supplier Responsibility Risk: The Effects of Certification, Audit, and Contingency Payment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2795-2812, September.
    34. Sungki Kim & Nina Shin & Sangwook Park, 2020. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Coordination under a Reward–Penalty and a Manufacturer’s Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-28, November.
    35. Jaehyung An & Soo-Haeng Cho & Christopher S. Tang, 2015. "Aggregating Smallholder Farmers in Emerging Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(9), pages 1414-1429, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiayu Chen & Anyan Qi & Milind Dawande, 2020. "Supplier Centrality and Auditing Priority in Socially Responsible Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1199-1214, November.
    2. Nur Sunar & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2022. "Socially relevant and inclusive operations management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4379-4392, December.
    3. Fan, Xiaoqing & Zhang, Jianxiong & Yao, Yao & Wei, Liqun, 2024. "Social responsibility disclosure format in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Han Zhang & Goker Aydin & Rodney P. Parker, 2022. "Social Responsibility Auditing in Supply Chain Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1058-1077, February.
    5. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2020. "Motivating Supplier Social Responsibility Under Incomplete Visibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1268-1286, November.
    6. Gao, Ruoxin & Yao, Shiqing & Yang, Ruina, 2024. "Responsible audit and consumer awareness under collusion risk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(2), pages 466-476.
    7. Qi Feng & Chengzhang Li & Mengshi Lu & J. George Shanthikumar, 2022. "Implementing Environmental and Social Responsibility Programs in Supply Networks Through Multiunit Bilateral Negotiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2579-2599, April.
    8. Xiaopei Dai & Yen-Ting Lin & Ruixia Shi & Di Xu, 2020. "A manufacturer’s responsible sourcing strategy: going organic or participating in fair trade?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 195-218, August.
    9. Tarkan Tan & M. Hakan Akyüz & Bengisu Urlu & Santiago Ruiz, 2024. "Stop Auditing and Start to CARE: Paradigm Shift in Assessing and Improving Supplier Sustainability," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 241-263, May.
    10. Chen, Qi & Duan, Yongrui, 2023. "Impact of information disclosure on global supply chain greenwashing: Is more information transparency always better?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    11. Ma, Xin & Talluri, Srinivas & Ferguson, Mark & Tiwari, Sunil, 2022. "Strategic production and responsible sourcing decisions under an emissions trading scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1429-1443.
    12. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    13. Soo-Haeng Cho & Victor DeMiguel & Woonam Hwang, 2021. "Cover-Up of Vehicle Defects: The Role of Regulator Investigation Announcements," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3834-3852, June.
    14. Feryal Erhun & Tim Kraft & Sytske Wijnsma, 2021. "Sustainable Triple‐A Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 644-655, March.
    15. Cao, Yu & Shao, Tong & Wan, Guangyu & Yi, Chaoqun, 2024. "Signaling green capability with wholesale price or certification," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    16. Basak Kalkanci & Erica L. Plambeck, 2020. "Reveal the Supplier List? A Trade-off in Capacity vs. Responsibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1251-1267, November.
    17. Xin Fang & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2020. "Cooperative Approaches to Managing Social Responsibility in a Market with Externalities," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1215-1233, November.
    18. Albert Y. Ha & Weixin Shang & Yunjie Wang, 2023. "Supplier Audit Information Sharing and Responsible Sourcing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(1), pages 308-324, January.
    19. Guo, Lei & Yin, Haitao & Zhao, Xuan & Zhu, Qinghua, 2022. "Managing your own low-tier suppliers via donation to NGOs: Why do multi-national corporations bother?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    20. Jin, Tao & Jiang, Yulian & Liu, Xingwen, 2023. "Evolutionary game analysis of the impact of dynamic dual credit policy on new energy vehicles after subsidy cancellation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3261-:d:1064465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.