IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v70y2024i8p5208-5225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benefit of Consumer Showrooming for a Physical Retailer: A Distribution Channel Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Hao

    (Gabelli School of Business, Fordham University, New York, New York 10023)

  • Subodha Kumar

    (Fox School of Business, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

Abstract

Consumer showrooming has become a common phenomenon in the retail industry, but little is known about its influence on the interplay between an upstream supplier and a downstream retailer in a distribution channel. Our study examines such an influence by considering an upstream supplier who sells a product through a downstream physical retailer based on a wholesale contract. At the same time, based on an agency contract, the supplier sells the product on an online retail platform where a nonneglectable amount of consumer returns occurs due to product misfits. We find that, on the one hand, consumer showrooming enables the supplier to take a greater share of the offline channel profit by exploiting the physical retailer’s deterrence of showrooming. On the other hand, consumer showrooming as a mixed-channel shopping method makes the supplier less capable of adjusting the direct online demand according to its marginal cost of handling returns. Such a return-loss-propagation-moderating effect protects the downstream physical retailer from the upstream supplier’s strategic pricing that intends to shift sales from offline to direct online when the supplier finds it cost efficient to handle online product returns. Our study also shows that the retailer can replace the wholesale contract with the store-within-a-store model with a rental fee contract to leverage the upstream supplier’s incentive to mitigate the adverse effect of showrooming. The findings inform the physical retailer that the more critical issue may not be showrooming itself but aligning with the upstream supplier to promote offline sales in the presence of showrooming.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Hao & Subodha Kumar, 2024. "Benefit of Consumer Showrooming for a Physical Retailer: A Distribution Channel Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(8), pages 5208-5225, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:5208-5225
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.01990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.01990
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2020.01990?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monic Sun, 2011. "Disclosing Multiple Product Attributes," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 195-224, March.
    2. Fassnacht, Martin & Beatty, Sharon E. & Szajna, Markus, 2019. "Combating the negative effects of showrooming: Successful salesperson tactics for converting showroomers into buyers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 131-139.
    3. Young Kwark & Jianqing Chen & Srinivasan Raghunathan, 2014. "Online Product Reviews: Implications for Retailers and Competing Manufacturers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 93-110, March.
    4. Eric T. Anderson & Karsten Hansen & Duncan Simester, 2009. "The Option Value of Returns: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 405-423, 05-06.
    5. Bing Jing, 2018. "Showrooming and Webrooming: Information Externalities Between Online and Offline Sellers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 469-483, May.
    6. Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Biswajit Sarkar & Baishakhi Ganguly & Asif Iqbal Malik & Rafael Batista & Young Hae Lee, 2018. "Optimization of sample size and order size in an inventory model with quality inspection and return of defective items," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 445-467, December.
    7. Gensler, Sonja & Neslin, Scott A. & Verhoef, Peter C., 2017. "The Showrooming Phenomenon: It's More than Just About Price," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 29-43.
    8. Zheyin (Jane) Gu & Ying Xie, 2013. "Facilitating Fit Revelation in the Competitive Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(5), pages 1196-1212, May.
    9. Xuanming Su, 2009. "Consumer Returns Policies and Supply Chain Performance," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 595-612, March.
    10. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    11. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 756-784, June.
    12. Jeffrey D. Shulman & Anne T. Coughlan & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Optimal Restocking Fees and Information Provision in an Integrated Demand-Supply Model of Product Returns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 577-594, December.
    13. Yubo Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 477-491, March.
    14. Panos M. Markopoulos & Kartik Hosanagar, 2018. "A Model of Product Design and Information Disclosure Investments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 739-759, February.
    15. Prabuddha De & Yu (Jeffrey) Hu & Mohammad S. Rahman, 2013. "Product-Oriented Web Technologies and Product Returns: An Exploratory Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 998-1010, December.
    16. Zheyin Gu & Giri Tayi, 2015. "Consumer mending and online retailer fit-uncertainty mitigating strategies," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 251-282, September.
    17. Jeffrey D. Shulman & Anne T. Coughlan & R. Canan Savaskan, 2010. "Optimal Reverse Channel Structure for Consumer Product Returns," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1071-1085, 11-12.
    18. Wei-yu Kevin Chiang & Dilip Chhajed & James D. Hess, 2003. "Direct Marketing, Indirect Profits: A Strategic Analysis of Dual-Channel Supply-Chain Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 1-20, January.
    19. Lin Hao & Yong Tan, 2019. "Who Wants Consumers to Be Informed? Facilitating Information Disclosure in a Distribution Channel," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 34-49, March.
    20. Anuj Kumar & Amit Mehra & Subodha Kumar, 2019. "Why Do Stores Drive Online Sales? Evidence of Underlying Mechanisms from a Multichannel Retailer," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 319-338, March.
    21. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Shankar Sundaresan & Bo Zhang, 2014. "Browse-and-Switch: Retail-Online Competition under Value Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(7), pages 1129-1145, July.
    22. Schneider, Patricia J. & Zielke, Stephan, 2020. "Searching offline and buying online – An analysis of showrooming forms and segments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    23. Ni Huang & Tianshu Sun & Peiyu Chen & Joseph M. Golden, 2019. "Word-of-Mouth System Implementation and Customer Conversion: A Randomized Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 805-818, September.
    24. Yue, Xiaohang & Raghunathan, Srinivasan, 2007. "The impacts of the full returns policy on a supply chain with information asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 630-647, July.
    25. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    26. Ahmed Timoumi & Narendra Singh & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Is Your Retailer a Friend or Foe: When Should the Manufacturer Allow Its Retailer to Refurbish?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(9), pages 2814-2839, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong, Yuyun & Shen, Wenjing & Ceryan, Oben, 2023. "Information provision under showrooming and webrooming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    2. Duong, Quang Huy & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & Nguyen, Truong Van & Ieromonachou, Petros & Nguyen, Duy Tiep, 2022. "Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Lin Hao & Yong Tan, 2019. "Who Wants Consumers to Be Informed? Facilitating Information Disclosure in a Distribution Channel," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 34-49, March.
    4. Mandal, Prasenjit & Basu, Preetam & Saha, Kushal, 2021. "Forays into omnichannel: An online retailer’s strategies for managing product returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 633-651.
    5. Zhang, Tao & Li, Gang & Lai, Kin Keung & Leung, John W.K., 2018. "Information disclosure strategies for the intermediary and competitive sellers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1156-1173.
    6. Santiago Gallino & Antonio Moreno, 2018. "The Value of Fit Information in Online Retail: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 767-787, October.
    7. Necati Ertekin & Anupam Agrawal, 2021. "How Does a Return Period Policy Change Affect Multichannel Retailer Profitability?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 210-229, 1-2.
    8. Laura Wagner & Victor Martínez-de-Albéniz, 2020. "Pricing and Assortment Strategies with Product Exchanges," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 453-466, March.
    9. Sun, Miao & Chen, Jing & Tian, Ye & Yan, Yufei, 2021. "The impact of online reviews in the presence of customer returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Zhang, Kun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Dai, Yue & Wen, Xin, 2024. "Blockchain adoption in retail operations: Stablecoins and traceability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(1), pages 147-160.
    11. Yuan, Mao & Pun, Hubert & Guan, Xu, 2022. "Information disclosure in a supply chain with copycat threat," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 1018-1030.
    12. Sun, Yanhong & Wang, Zihan & Han, Xiaohua, 2020. "Supply chain channel strategies for online retailers: Whether to introduce web showrooms?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    13. Zheyin (Jane) Gu & Giri K. Tayi, 2015. "Consumer mending and online retailer fit-uncertainty mitigating strategies," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 251-282, September.
    14. Necati Ertekin & Jeffrey D. Shulman & Haipeng (Allan) Chen, 2019. "On the Profitability of Stacked Discounts: Identifying Revenue and Cost Effects of Discount Framing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 317-342, March.
    15. Hongpeng Wang & Rong Du & Jin Li & Weiguo Fan, 2020. "Subdivided or aggregated online review systems: Which is better for online takeaway vendors?," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 915-944, December.
    16. Guangyong Yang & Guojun Ji & Kim Hua Tan, 2022. "Impact of artificial intelligence adoption on online returns policies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 703-726, January.
    17. Subrata Mitra, 2022. "Economic models of price competition between traditional and online retailing under showrooming," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(1), pages 29-63, March.
    18. Pun, Hubert & Chen, Jing & Li, Wei, 2020. "Channel strategy for manufacturers in the presence of service freeriders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 460-479.
    19. Difrancesco, Rita Maria & Huchzermeier, Arnd & Schröder, David, 2018. "Optimizing the return window for online fashion retailers with closed-loop refurbishment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 205-221.
    20. Schneider, Patricia J. & Zielke, Stephan, 2021. "Price versus service: Can retailers beat showrooming with competence?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:70:y:2024:i:8:p:5208-5225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.