IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v64y2018i11p5220-5233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bricks-and-Mortar Entry by Online Retailers in the Presence of Consumer Sales Taxes

Author

Listed:
  • Anil Arya

    (Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210)

  • Brian Mittendorf

    (Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210)

Abstract

This paper presents a parsimonious model of the bricks-and-mortar entry choice of online retailers in light of consumer sales taxes. On the one hand, a retailer benefits by entry since the second distribution channel enables it to reach new customers, giving it a leg up on rivals. On the other hand, physical entry typically compels the retailer to start collecting sales taxes even for online transactions, making its consumers particularly price sensitive. This paper examines this trade-off to characterize a retailer’s entry decision, as well as the market-level equilibrium of bricks-and-mortar penetration. The paper then layers in supply market considerations—namely, the retailer’s procurement of products from upstream suppliers. The analysis demonstrates that sales taxes not only reduce the consumers’ willingness to pay for products in the retail market, but also dampen the retailer’s willingness to pay for the products in the wholesale arena. This reluctance influences the clearing price in the supply market and, thus, the firm’s decision to establish the physical retail store.

Suggested Citation

  • Anil Arya & Brian Mittendorf, 2018. "Bricks-and-Mortar Entry by Online Retailers in the Presence of Consumer Sales Taxes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5220-5233, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:64:y:2018:i:11:p:5220-5233
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2910
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2910?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brian Baugh & Itzhak Ben‐David & Hoonsuk Park, 2018. "Can Taxes Shape an Industry? Evidence from the Implementation of the “Amazon Tax”," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1819-1855, August.
    2. David R. Bell & Santiago Gallino & Antonio Moreno, 2018. "Offline Showrooms in Omnichannel Retail: Demand and Operational Benefits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 1629-1651, April.
    3. Liran Einav & Dan Knoepfle & Jonathan Levin & Neel Sundaresan, 2014. "Sales Taxes and Internet Commerce," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(1), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Michael Alles & Srikant Datar, 1998. "Strategic Transfer Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 451-461, April.
    5. Barry Alan Pasternack, 1985. "Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 166-176.
    6. Hui Chen & Bjorn N. Jorgensen, 2018. "Market Exit Through Divestment—The Effect of Accounting Bias on Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 164-177, January.
    7. Stephen F. Hamilton, 2009. "Excise Taxes with Multiproduct Transactions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(1), pages 458-471, March.
    8. Andy A. Tsay, 1999. "The Quantity Flexibility Contract and Supplier-Customer Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(10), pages 1339-1358, October.
    9. Hu, Yu Jeffrey & Tang, Zhulei, 2014. "The impact of sales tax on internet and catalog sales: Evidence from a natural experiment," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 84-90.
    10. Fershtman, Chaim & Judd, Kenneth L, 1987. "Equilibrium Incentives in Oligopoly," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 77(5), pages 927-940, December.
    11. Corona, Carlos & Nan, Lin, 2013. "Preannouncing competitive decisions in oligopoly markets," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 73-90.
    12. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    13. Jeffrey L. Hoopes & Jacob R. Thornock & Braden M. Williams, 2016. "Does Use Tax Evasion Provide a Competitive Advantage to E-Tailers?," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 69(1), pages 133-168, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuo, Chia-Wei & Xiong, Hui & Chen, Ying-Ju & Chang, Ting-Kai & Wu, Shining & Chang, Yung-Hsun, 2024. "Vertical product line extension when online retailers serve as mom-and-pop stores’ suppliers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    2. Aika Monden & Yusuke Zennyo, 2022. "Consumer rebates from e‐commerce platforms and multichannel management of third‐party sellers," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 3059-3071, October.
    3. Chongping Chen & Xiaopo Zhuo & Yanshan Li, 2022. "Online channel introduction under contract negotiation: Reselling versus agency selling," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 146-158, January.
    4. Niu, Baozhuang & Chen, Lingyun & Wang, Jingmai, 2022. "Ad valorem tariff vs. specific tariff: Quality-differentiated e-tailers’ profitability and social welfare in cross-border e-commerce," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    5. Zhen, Xueping & Xu, Shuangshuang, 2022. "Who should introduce the third-party platform channel under different pricing strategies?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 168-182.
    6. Kira Zerwer, 2024. "VAT do you eat? Green consumption taxes and firms' market share," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 504-523, June.
    7. Zha, Yong & Wu, Xiangxiang & Liu, Haonan & Yu, Yugang, 2023. "Impact of a Platform Developer's Entry on the Device Manufacturer with Different Power Structures and Revenue Models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Zhou, Yu & Gao, Xiang & Luo, Suyuan & Xiong, Yu & Ye, Niangyue, 2022. "Anti-Counterfeiting in a retail Platform: A Game-Theoretic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    9. Zhang, Tianyu & Dong, Peiwu & Chen, Xiangfeng & Gong, Yu, 2023. "The impacts of blockchain adoption on a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse members," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Shi, Xiutian & Tang, Jianxi & Dong, Ciwei, 2022. "Should a domestic firm carve out a niche in overseas markets? Value of purchasing agents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(1), pages 85-94.
    11. Burcu B. Keskin & Emily C. Barbee, 2021. "Case Article—GreatDeal and NewChicken Merger: Designing an Omni-Channel Supply Chain," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 42-47, September.
    12. Mandal, Prasenjit & Basu, Preetam & Saha, Kushal, 2021. "Forays into omnichannel: An online retailer’s strategies for managing product returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 633-651.
    13. Zhen, Xueping & Shi, Dan & Li, Yongjian & Zhang, Chu, 2020. "Manufacturer’s financing strategy in a dual-channel supply chain: Third-party platform, bank, and retailer credit financing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van der Rhee, Bo & Schmidt, Glen & A. van der Veen, Jack A. & Venugopal, V., 2014. "Revenue-sharing contracts across an extended supply chain," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 57(4), pages 473-482.
    2. Xuanming Su, 2008. "Bounded Rationality in Newsvendor Models," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 566-589, May.
    3. Terry A. Taylor & Erica L. Plambeck, 2007. "Simple Relational Contracts to Motivate Capacity Investment: Price Only vs. Price and Quantity," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(1), pages 94-113, January.
    4. Mallick Hossain, 2022. "A world without borders revisited: Impact of online sales tax collection on shopping and search," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 48-63, February.
    5. Wang, Yulan & Zipkin, Paul, 2009. "Agents' incentives under buy-back contracts in a two-stage supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 525-539, August.
    6. Zhang, Dengfeng & de Matta, Renato & Lowe, Timothy J., 2010. "Channel coordination in a consignment contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 897-905, December.
    7. Bellantuono, Nicola & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Pontrandolfo, Pierpaolo & Tang, Christopher S., 2009. "The implications of joint adoption of revenue sharing and advance booking discount programs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 383-394, October.
    8. Niu, Baozhuang & Li, Qiyang & Liu, Yaoqi, 2020. "Conflict management in a multinational firm's production shifting decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    9. Burer, Samuel & Jones, Philip C. & Lowe, Timothy J., 2008. "Coordinating the supply chain in the agricultural seed industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 354-377, February.
    10. Yong Zha & Kehong Chen & Xiaohang Yue & Yugang Yu & Samar Mukhopadhyay, 2019. "Trade credit contract in the presence of retailer investment opportunity," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(4), pages 283-296, June.
    11. Biswas, Indranil & Avittathur, Balram, 2019. "Channel coordination using options contract under simultaneous price and inventory competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 45-60.
    12. Sainathan, Arvind & Groenevelt, Harry, 2019. "Vendor managed inventory contracts – coordinating the supply chain while looking from the vendor’s perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 249-260.
    13. Kirshner, Samuel N. & Shao, Lusheng, 2018. "Internal and external reference effects in a two-tier supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 944-957.
    14. Lu, Lijian & Wu, Yaozhong, 2015. "Preferences for contractual forms in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 74-84.
    15. Xingzheng Ai & Jing Chen & Jianhua Ma, 2012. "Contracting with demand uncertainty under supply chain competition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 17-38, December.
    16. Jörnsten, Kurt & Lise Nonås, Sigrid & Sandal, Leif & Ubøe, Jan, 2012. "Transfer of risk in the newsvendor model with discrete demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 404-414.
    17. Wong, Hartanto & Kim, Kilsun & Chhajed, Dilip, 2021. "Reducing channel inefficiency in product line design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    18. Daniel Granot & Shuya Yin, 2005. "On the effectiveness of returns policies in the price‐dependent newsvendor model," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(8), pages 765-779, December.
    19. Devangan, Lokendra & Amit, R.K. & Mehta, Peeyush & Swami, Sanjeev & Shanker, Kripa, 2013. "Individually rational buyback contracts with inventory level dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 381-387.
    20. Senlin Zhao & Qinghua Zhu, 2017. "Remanufacturing supply chain coordination under the stochastic remanufacturability rate and the random demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 661-695, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:64:y:2018:i:11:p:5220-5233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.