IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v43y2024i5p1081-1101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer-to-Peer Markets with Bilateral Ratings

Author

Listed:
  • T. Tony Ke

    (Department of Marketing, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong)

  • Monic Sun

    (Department of Marketing, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215)

  • Baojun Jiang

    (Department of Marketing, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

Abstract

Peer-to-peer (P2P) markets have become a critical aspect of the modern economy. We consider a P2P market in which a time-sensitive service is provided through a platform that matches providers of varying qualities to customers of varying costs. The P2P platform features bilateral ratings, which distinguish it from a traditional market: ratings of a provider reveal the provider’s service quality and ratings of a customer reveal the customer’s service cost. The existence of a cost measure in the P2P market leads to novel pricing considerations: a provider can attract low-cost customers by charging a low price, leading to an endogenous composition effect. As a result, equilibrium prices may decrease as customers become more costly to serve or as the platform’s commission rate gets higher. Under certain conditions, high-quality providers may even charge a lower equilibrium price than low-quality providers in order to cherry-pick low-cost customers. Exploratory analysis reveals that, compared with unilateral ratings, bilateral ratings may soften provider competition and raise equilibrium prices as the providers target customers in different cost segments. History: Anthony Dukes served as the senior editor. Funding: This work was supported by the NET Institute (summer research fund). Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0158 .

Suggested Citation

  • T. Tony Ke & Monic Sun & Baojun Jiang, 2024. "Peer-to-Peer Markets with Bilateral Ratings," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(5), pages 1081-1101, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:5:p:1081-1101
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2022.0158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.0158
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2022.0158?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:43:y:2024:i:5:p:1081-1101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.