IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v36y2024i4p1023-1039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Shrinkage Approach to Improve Direct Bootstrap Resampling Under Input Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Eunhye Song

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Henry Lam

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

  • Russell R. Barton

    (Department of Supply Chain and Information Systems, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

Abstract

Discrete-event simulation models generate random variates from input distributions and compute outputs according to the simulation logic. The input distributions are typically fitted to finite real-world data and thus are subject to estimation errors that can propagate to the simulation outputs: an issue commonly known as input uncertainty (IU). This paper investigates quantifying IU using the output confidence intervals (CIs) computed from bootstrap quantile estimators. The standard direct bootstrap method has overcoverage due to convolution of the simulation error and IU; however, the brute-force way of washing away the former is computationally demanding. We present two new bootstrap methods to enhance direct resampling in both statistical and computational efficiencies using shrinkage strategies to down-scale the variabilities encapsulated in the CIs. Our asymptotic analysis shows how both approaches produce tight CIs accounting for IU under limited input data and simulation effort along with the simulation sample-size requirements relative to the input data size. We demonstrate performances of the shrinkage strategies with several numerical experiments and investigate the conditions under which each method performs well. We also show advantages of nonparametric approaches over parametric bootstrap when the distribution family is misspecified and over metamodel approaches when the dimension of the distribution parameters is high.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunhye Song & Henry Lam & Russell R. Barton, 2024. "A Shrinkage Approach to Improve Direct Bootstrap Resampling Under Input Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 1023-1039, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:36:y:2024:i:4:p:1023-1039
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2022.0044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morgan, Lucy E. & Nelson, Barry L. & Titman, Andrew C. & Worthington, David J., 2019. "Detecting bias due to input modelling in computer simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 869-881.
    2. Soumyadip Ghosh & Henry Lam, 2019. "Robust Analysis in Stochastic Simulation: Computation and Performance Guarantees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 232-249, January.
    3. Y Lin & E Song & B L Nelson, 2015. "Single-experiment input uncertainty," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 249-259, August.
    4. Russell R. Barton & Barry L. Nelson & Wei Xie, 2014. "Quantifying Input Uncertainty via Simulation Confidence Intervals," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 74-87, February.
    5. Julie McIntyre & Leonard Stefanski, 2011. "Density Estimation with Replicate Heteroscedastic Measurements," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 63(1), pages 81-99, February.
    6. Edmond S.-W. Ng & Richard Grieve & James R. Carpenter, 2013. "Two-stage nonparametric bootstrap sampling with shrinkage correction for clustered data," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 13(1), pages 141-164, March.
    7. Wei Xie & Barry L. Nelson & Russell R. Barton, 2014. "A Bayesian Framework for Quantifying Uncertainty in Stochastic Simulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1439-1452, December.
    8. Eunhye Song & Barry L. Nelson, 2015. "Quickly Assessing Contributions to Input Uncertainty," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(9), pages 893-909, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhaolin Hu & L. Jeff Hong, 2022. "Robust Simulation with Likelihood-Ratio Constrained Input Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2350-2367, July.
    2. Weiwei Fan & L. Jeff Hong & Xiaowei Zhang, 2020. "Distributionally Robust Selection of the Best," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 190-208, January.
    3. Jun Yuan & Haowei Wang & Szu Hui Ng & Victor Nian, 2020. "Ship Emission Mitigation Strategies Choice Under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Lucy E. Morgan & Luke Rhodes-Leader & Russell R. Barton, 2022. "Reducing and Calibrating for Input Model Bias in Computer Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2368-2382, July.
    5. Corlu, Canan G. & Akcay, Alp & Xie, Wei, 2020. "Stochastic simulation under input uncertainty: A Review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    6. Soumyadip Ghosh & Henry Lam, 2019. "Robust Analysis in Stochastic Simulation: Computation and Performance Guarantees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 232-249, January.
    7. Helin Zhu & Tianyi Liu & Enlu Zhou, 2015. "Risk Quantification in Stochastic Simulation under Input Uncertainty," Papers 1507.06015, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2017.
    8. L. Jeff Hong & Guangxin Jiang, 2019. "Offline Simulation Online Application: A New Framework of Simulation-Based Decision Making," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(06), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Barry L. Nelson & Alan T. K. Wan & Guohua Zou & Xinyu Zhang & Xi Jiang, 2021. "Reducing Simulation Input-Model Risk via Input Model Averaging," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 672-684, May.
    10. Wen Shi & Xi Chen & Jennifer Shang, 2019. "An Efficient Morris Method-Based Framework for Simulation Factor Screening," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 745-770, October.
    11. Ali Al-Sharadqah & Majid Mojirsheibani & William Pouliot, 2020. "On the performance of weighted bootstrapped kernel deconvolution density estimators," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 1773-1798, August.
    12. Mingbin Ben Feng & Eunhye Song, 2020. "Efficient Nested Simulation Experiment Design via the Likelihood Ratio Method," Papers 2008.13087, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    13. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    14. Lin, Lisha & Li, Yaqiong & Gao, Rui & Wu, Jianhong, 2021. "The numerical simulation of Quanto option prices using Bayesian statistical methods," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 567(C).
    15. Aurore Delaigle & Peter Hall, 2016. "Methodology for non-parametric deconvolution when the error distribution is unknown," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(1), pages 231-252, January.
    16. Kim, Sojung & Weber, Stefan, 2022. "Simulation methods for robust risk assessment and the distorted mix approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 380-398.
    17. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2017. "Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 1-16.
    18. Shi, Wen & Zhou, Qing & Zhou, Yanju, 2023. "An efficient elementary effect-based method for sensitivity analysis in identifying main and two-factor interaction effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    19. Sojung Kim & Stefan Weber, 2020. "Simulation Methods for Robust Risk Assessment and the Distorted Mix Approach," Papers 2009.03653, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    20. Botosaru, Irene, 2023. "Time-varying unobserved heterogeneity in earnings shocks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1378-1393.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:36:y:2024:i:4:p:1023-1039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.