IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i4p1958-1969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinguishing Homophily from Peer Influence Through Network Representation Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Xi Chen

    (Data Science and Engineering Management, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Center for Research on Zhejiang Digital Development and Governance, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Yan Liu

    (Data Science and Engineering Management, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Cheng Zhang

    (Department of Information Management and Business Intelligence, School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Peer influence and homophily are two entangled forces underlying social influences. However, distinguishing homophily from peer influence is difficult, particularly when there is latent homophily caused by unobservable features. This paper proposes a novel data-driven framework that combines the advantages of latent homophily identification and causal inference. Specifically, the approach first utilizes scalable network representation learning algorithms to obtain node embeddings, which are extracted from social network structures. Then, the embeddings are used to control latent homophily in a quasi-experimental design for causal inference. The simulation experiments show that the proposed approach can estimate peer influence more accurately than existing parameterized approaches and data-driven methods. We applied the proposed framework in an empirical study of players’ online gaming behaviors. First, our approach can achieve improved model fitness for estimating peer influence in online games. Second, we discover a heterogeneous effect of peer influence: players with higher tenure and playing levels receive stronger peer influence. Finally, our results suggest that the homophily effect has a stronger influence on players’ behavior than peer influence. Summary of Contribution: The study proposes a novel computational method to separate peer influence from homophily in an online network. Using network embeddings learned from data to control latent homophily, the approach effectively addresses the challenge of correctly identifying peer effects in the absence of randomized experimental conditions. While simplifying the computational process, the method achieves good computational performance, thus effectively helping researchers and practitioners extract useful network information in various online service contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi Chen & Yan Liu & Cheng Zhang, 2022. "Distinguishing Homophily from Peer Influence Through Network Representation Learning," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1958-1969, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:4:p:1958-1969
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2022.1171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1171
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2022.1171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bramoullé, Yann & Djebbari, Habiba & Fortin, Bernard, 2009. "Identification of peer effects through social networks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 41-55, May.
    2. Yufei Huang & Bilal Gokpinar & Christopher S. Tang & Onesun Steve Yoo, 2018. "Selling Innovative Products in the Presence of Externalities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(7), pages 1236-1250, July.
    3. Fan Zhou & Kunpeng Zhang & Bangying Wu & Yi Yang & Harry Jiannan Wang, 2021. "Unifying Online and Offline Preference for Social Link Prediction," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1400-1418, October.
    4. Nickell, Stephen J, 1981. "Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 49(6), pages 1417-1426, November.
    5. Thomas D. Cook, 2003. "Why have Educational Evaluators Chosen Not to Do Randomized Experiments?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 589(1), pages 114-149, September.
    6. Michael Kremer & Dan Levy, 2008. "Peer Effects and Alcohol Use among College Students," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 189-206, Summer.
    7. Liye Ma & Ramayya Krishnan & Alan L. Montgomery, 2015. "Latent Homophily or Social Influence? An Empirical Analysis of Purchase Within a Social Network," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 454-473, February.
    8. Fujimoto, Kayo & Valente, Thomas W., 2012. "Social network influences on adolescent substance use: Disentangling structural equivalence from cohesion," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(12), pages 1952-1960.
    9. Fan Zhou & Kunpeng Zhang & Shuying Xie & Xucheng Luo, 2020. "Learning to Correlate Accounts Across Online Social Networks: An Embedding-Based Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 714-729, July.
    10. Matthew O. Jackson & Brian W. Rogers, 2007. "Meeting Strangers and Friends of Friends: How Random Are Social Networks?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(3), pages 890-915, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao Lin & Guannan Liu & Junjie Wu & J. Leon Zhao, 2024. "Deterring the Gray Market: Product Diversion Detection via Learning Disentangled Representations of Multivariate Time Series," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 571-586, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bin Zhang & Paul A. Pavlou & Ramayya Krishnan, 2018. "On Direct vs. Indirect Peer Influence in Large Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 292-314, June.
    2. Rhys Murrian & Paul A. Raschky & Klaus Ackermann, 2024. "Friends, Key Players and the Adoption and Use of Experience Goods," Monash Economics Working Papers 2024-17, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    3. Magnus A. H. Gulbrandsen, 2021. "Peer effects and debt accumulation: Evidence from lottery winnings," Working Paper 2021/10, Norges Bank.
    4. Mundt, Philipp, 2021. "The formation of input–output architecture: Evidence from the European Union," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 89-104.
    5. Hoeben, Evelien M. & Meldrum, Ryan C. & Walker, D'Andre & Young, Jacob T.N., 2016. "The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: A state-of-the-art review," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 108-122.
    6. Bonan, Jacopo & Battiston, Pietro & Bleck, Jaimie & LeMay-Boucher, Philippe & Pareglio, Stefano & Sarr, Bassirou & Tavoni, Massimo, 2021. "Social interaction and technology adoption: Experimental evidence from improved cookstoves in Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Bolletta, Ugo, 2021. "A model of peer effects in school," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Yann Bramoullé & Bernard Fortin, 2009. "The Econometrics of Social Networks," Cahiers de recherche 0913, CIRPEE.
    9. David Card & Laura Giuliano, 2013. "Peer Effects and Multiple Equilibria in the Risky Behavior of Friends," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 95(4), pages 1130-1149, October.
    10. Huremovic, Kenan & Nurarelli, Federico & Serti, Francesco & Vega-Redondo, Fernando, 2024. "Learning Trade Opportunities through Production Network," UC3M Working papers. Economics 43951, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Economía.
    11. Áureo de Paula, 2015. "Econometrics of network models," CeMMAP working papers CWP52/15, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    12. Díez-Amigo, Sandro, 2014. "The Impact of College Peers on Academic Performance: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Chile," MPRA Paper 62913, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Aug 2014.
    13. Tsusaka, Takuji W. & Kajisa, Kei & Pede, Valerien O. & Aoyagi, Keitaro, 2015. "Neighborhood effects and social behavior: The case of irrigated and rainfed farmers in Bohol, the Philippines," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 227-246.
    14. Hang Xiong & Puqing Wang & Georgiy Bobashev, 2018. "Multiple peer effects in the diffusion of innovations on social networks: a simulation study," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Antoni Calvó-Armengol & Eleonora Patacchini & Yves Zenou, 2009. "Peer Effects and Social Networks in Education," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 76(4), pages 1239-1267.
    16. Richard Murphy & Felix Weinhardt, 2020. "Top of the Class: The Importance of Ordinal Rank," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 87(6), pages 2777-2826.
    17. Patacchini, Eleonora & Bisin, Alberto, 2019. "Dynamic Social Interactions and Health Risk Behavior," CEPR Discussion Papers 13918, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Hema Yoganarasimhan, 2012. "Impact of social network structure on content propagation: A study using YouTube data," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 111-150, March.
    19. Kripfganz, Sebastian, 2014. "Unconditional Transformed Likelihood Estimation of Time-Space Dynamic Panel Data Models," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100604, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. Neilson, William & Wichmann, Bruno, 2014. "Social networks and non-market valuations," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 155-170.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:4:p:1958-1969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.