IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/imx/journl/v16y2021itneaa10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FinTech's business model in Mexico, a preliminary analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Luz del Carmen Díaz-Peña

    (Think Tank Financiero, México & Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, México)

Abstract

Este estudio analiza las principales variables de éxito en el modelo de negocio de una Fintech. Los datos fueron obtenidos mediante un cuestionario aplicado a quince Fintech mexicanas. Los resultados preliminares muestran que las variables clave de éxito, de acuerdo con una correlación significativa con el crecimiento de la empresa, son: un uso eficiente de la infraestructura, servicios orientados al cliente, salarios competitivos y la seguridad de la información; el tipo de Fintech más común es el de "pagos y servicios de dinero móvil" seguido de "crowdfunding" e "inversiones". En México, no existe una fuente formal que facilite el conocimiento de la industria, por lo que la originalidad de este estudio radica en la contribución a una mejor comprensión introductoria de cómo funcionan las Fintech, incluyendo otras dimensiones como las sociales y ambientales que no se habían considerando antes. Su limitante es el número de empresas interrogadas, pero se podrían hacer futuros estudios complementarios. Se puede concluir que la dimensión tecnológica es la más relevante para la industria.

Suggested Citation

  • Luz del Carmen Díaz-Peña, 2021. "FinTech's business model in Mexico, a preliminary analysis," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 16(TNEA), pages 1-16, Septiembr.
    • Handle: RePEc:imx:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:tnea:a:10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.remef.org.mx/index.php/remef/article/view/590
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerald E. Hills & Raymond W. Laforge, 1992. "Research at the Marketing Interface to Advance Entrepreneurship Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 16(3), pages 33-60, April.
    2. Gozman, Daniel & Liebenau, Jonathan & Mangan, Jonathan, 2018. "Innovation mechanisms of fintech start-ups: insights from SWIFT Innotribe competition," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86495, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Yong Jae Shin & Yongrok Choi, 2019. "Feasibility of the Fintech Industry as an Innovation Platform for Sustainable Economic Growth in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Lee, In & Shin, Yong Jae, 2018. "Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 35-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gang Kou & Özlem Olgu Akdeniz & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2021. "Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Florian Diener & Miroslav Špaček, 2021. "Digital Transformation in Banking: A Managerial Perspective on Barriers to Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, February.
    3. Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Sylvia Rohlfer & Jay Rajasekera, 2020. "An Eco-Systematic View of Cross-Sector Fintech: The Case of Alibaba and Tencent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    4. E.V. Popov & Zh. Omonov & D.B. Schulgin, 2020. "Institutional Factors in the Development of Financial Technologies in Russia," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 19(4), pages 585-604.
    5. Koranteng, Barbara & You, Kefei, 2024. "Fintech and financial stability: Evidence from spatial analysis for 25 countries," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Zhikai Peng & Jinchuan Ke, 2022. "Spillover Effect of the Interaction between Fintech and the Real Economy Based on Tail Risk Dependent Structure Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Payam Hanafizadeh & Mojdeh Gerami Amin, 2023. "The transformative potential of banking service domains with the emergence of FinTechs," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(3), pages 411-447, September.
    8. Roberto Moro-Visconti & Salvador Cruz Rambaud & Joaquín López Pascual, 2020. "Sustainability in FinTechs: An Explanation through Business Model Scalability and Market Valuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Katherin Carrera-Silva & Olga Maritza Rodríguez Ulcuango & Paula Abdo-Peralta & Ángel Gerardo Castelo Salazar & Carmen Amelia Samaniego Erazo & Diego Haro Ávalos, 2024. "Beyond the Financial Horizon: A Critical Review of Social Responsibility in Latin American Credit Unions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-23, September.
    10. Liu, Yongtuan & Wang, Kewei, 2024. "Asymmetric impacts of coal prices, fintech, and financial stress on clean energy stocks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    11. Mustafa Raza Rabbani & Shahnawaz Khan & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2020. "FinTech, Blockchain and Islamic Finance: An Extensive Literature Review," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 65-86.
    12. Iván Sosa Gómez & Óscar Montes Pineda, 2023. "What is an InsurTech? A scientific approach for defining the term," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 26(2), pages 125-173, July.
    13. Ruixin Su & Tong Zheng & Yuzhao Zhong & Weizhou Zhong, 2023. "Role of Digital Inclusive Finance for High-Quality Business Development: A Study of China’s “Five Development Concept” Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Alaassar, Ahmad & Mention, Anne-Laure & Aas, Tor Helge, 2021. "Exploring a new incubation model for FinTechs: Regulatory sandboxes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Georgy B. Kleiner & Maksim A. Rybachuk & Venera A. Karpinskaya, 2020. "Development of ecosystems in the financial sector of Russia," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 2-15, September.
    16. Galeone, Graziana & Ranaldo, Simona & Fusco, Antonio, 2024. "ESG and FinTech: Are they connected?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Ali, Abdul & Kelley, Donna J. & Levie, Jonathan, 2020. "Market-driven entrepreneurship and institutions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 117-128.
    18. Rahul Singh Gautam & Shailesh Rastogi & Aashi Rawal & Venkata Mrudula Bhimavarapu & Jagjeevan Kanoujiya & Samaksh Rastogi, 2022. "Financial Technology and Its Impact on Digital Literacy in India: Using Poverty as a Moderating Variable," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Jiamin Liu & Xiaoyu Ma & Bin Zhao & Qi Cui & Sisi Zhang & Jiaoning Zhang, 2023. "Mandatory Environmental Regulation, Enterprise Labor Demand and Green Innovation Transformation: A Quasi-Experiment from China’s New Environmental Protection Law," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-31, July.
    20. Baomin Chen & Xinyun Yang & Zhenzhong Ma, 2022. "Fintech and Financial Risks of Systemically Important Commercial Banks in China: An Inverted U-Shaped Relationship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fintech; variables de éxito; modelo de negocio; inclusión financiera; México;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • G00 - Financial Economics - - General - - - General
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imx:journl:v:16:y:2021:i:tnea:a:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ricardo Mendoza (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.remef.org.mx/index.php/remef/index .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.