IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3450-d1067407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Smart Farm as a Tool for Sustainable Economic Growth of Korean Agriculture: Using Input–Output Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Wook Choi

    (Division of AI Convergence, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea)

  • Yong Jae Shin

    (Division of AI Convergence, Sahmyook University, Seoul 01795, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study focused on smart farms in Korea to confirm that the fourth industrial revolution technology is a tool that can be used for sustainable economic development in agriculture. This study used the input–output table, which included the production-inducing effects of the demand inducement model, value-added inducing effects, supply shortage effects of the supply inducement model, and the interlinkage effect. These methods were used to compare the impact of smart farm machinery on agriculture and the impact of smart farms on the Korean economy compared to conventional agriculture, thereby confirming the extent of the effect of fourth industrial revolution technology on agriculture. This study was conducted to determine whether this agricultural sector could lead to sustainable economic development. The analysis revealed that the production-inducing effects of smart farms showed a greater ripple effect than those of the agricultural sector. However, both value-added inducing effects and supply shortage effects showed a larger ripple effect in the agricultural sector. Considering only the indirect effect, the smart farms were found to evenly affect secondary and tertiary industries. In the case of value-added inducing and supply shortage effects, agriculture was found to have a greater impact on the secondary industry, whereas smart agri-machines and farms had a greater impact on the tertiary industry. Moreover, according to the interlinkage effect, agriculture was classified as a raw industry with final demand, and smart farms as a manufacturing industry with intermediate demand. These results have several implications. For the fourth industrial revolution technology to lead sustainable economic growth in agriculture, continuous creation of new value by developing various types of business models linked to other industries in consideration of the industrial characteristics of smart farms and agri-machines is necessary. In addition, to fully demonstrate the economic effects of smart farms, continuous management and support are required so that smart technologies can be strategically utilized in the agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Wook Choi & Yong Jae Shin, 2023. "Role of Smart Farm as a Tool for Sustainable Economic Growth of Korean Agriculture: Using Input–Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3450-:d:1067407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3450/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3450/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rohman, Ibrahim Kholilul, 2013. "The globalization and stagnation of the ICT sectors in European countries: An input-output analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 387-399.
    2. Jun, Wang Ki & Lee, Min-Kyu & Choi, Jae Young, 2018. "Impact of the smart port industry on the Korean national economy using input-output analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 480-493.
    3. Shad Mahfuz & Hong-Seok Mun & Muhammad Ammar Dilawar & Chul-Ju Yang, 2022. "Applications of Smart Technology as a Sustainable Strategy in Modern Swine Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-15, February.
    4. Yong Jin Kim & Chan Young Kim & Yong Jae Shin, 2017. "The effects of ubiquitous healthcare service on the south Korean Economy: using input–output analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 1149-1160, October.
    5. Yong Jae Shin & Yongrok Choi, 2019. "Feasibility of the Fintech Industry as an Innovation Platform for Sustainable Economic Growth in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Kyunam Kim & Jung-Kyu Jung & Jae Young Choi, 2016. "Impact of the Smart City Industry on the Korean National Economy: Input-Output Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyunam Kim, 2024. "An Input–Output Analysis for the Economic Potential of a New Convergence Industry: A Focus on the Autonomous Vehicle Sector in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Jae Shin & Yongrok Choi, 2019. "Feasibility of the Fintech Industry as an Innovation Platform for Sustainable Economic Growth in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Khurram Shehzad & Umer Zaman & Ana Ercília José & Emrah Koçak & Paulo Ferreira, 2021. "An Officious Impact of Financial Innovations and ICT on Economic Evolution in China: Revealing the Substantial Role of BRI," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Hyunae Lee & Sunyoung Hlee, 2021. "The Intra- and Inter-Regional Economic Effects of Smart Tourism City Seoul: Analysis Using an Input-Output Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Jun, Wang Ki & An, Myung Ho & Choi, Jae Young, 2022. "Impact of the connected & autonomous vehicle industry on the Korean national economy using input-output analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Jun, Wang Ki & Lee, Min-Kyu & Choi, Jae Young, 2018. "Impact of the smart port industry on the Korean national economy using input-output analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 480-493.
    6. Yan Li & Xiaohan Zhang & Kaiyue Lin & Qingbo Huang, 2019. "The Analysis of a Simulation of a Port–City Green Cooperative Development, Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of Shanghai Port, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Khan, Yasir & Hassan, Taimoor & Guiqin, Huang & Nabi, Ghulam, 2023. "Analyzing the impact of natural resources and rule of law on sustainable environment: A proposed policy framework for BRICS economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    8. Iqbal, Mubasher & Arshed, Noman & Chan, Ling-Foon, 2024. "Exploring the dynamics: Biodiversity impacts of natural resource extraction with moderating influence of FinTech for sustainable practices in resource-rich nations," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Zhao, Deng & Zhen-fu, Li & Yu-tao, Zhou & Xiao, Chen & Shan-shan, Liang, 2020. "Measurement and spatial spillover effects of port comprehensive strength: Empirical evidence from China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 288-298.
    10. Md Sharifuzzaman & Hong-Seok Mun & Keiven Mark B. Ampode & Eddiemar B. Lagua & Hae-Rang Park & Young-Hwa Kim & Md Kamrul Hasan & Chul-Ju Yang, 2024. "Smart Pig Farming—A Journey Ahead of Vietnam," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, March.
    11. Dong Hyun Lee & Ga Youn Hong & Sang-Gun Lee, 2019. "The relationship among competitive advantage, catch-up, and linkage effects: a comparative study on ICT industry between South Korea and India," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(3), pages 603-624, September.
    12. Fernando Bermejo & Raúl del Pozo & Pablo Moya, 2021. "Main Factors Determining the Economic Production Sustained by Public Long-Term Care Spending in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-18, August.
    13. Thomas Puschmann & Christian Hugo Hoffmann & Valentyn Khmarskyi, 2020. "How Green FinTech Can Alleviate the Impact of Climate Change—The Case of Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-30, December.
    14. Jelena Ruso & Ana Horvat & Milica Marièiæ, 2019. "Do international standards influence the development of smart regions and cities?," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 37(2), pages 629-652.
    15. Jiaguo Liu & Jinxia Zhou & Fan Liu & Xiaohang Yue & Yudan Kong & Xiaoye Wang, 2019. "Interaction Analysis and Sustainable Development Strategy between Port and City: The Case of Liaoning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Alaa Othman & Sara El Gazzar & Matjaz Knez, 2022. "Investigating the Influences of Smart Port Practices and Technology Employment on Port Sustainable Performance: The Egypt Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    17. Seung-Min Jung & Sungwoo Park & Seung-Won Jung & Eenjun Hwang, 2020. "Monthly Electric Load Forecasting Using Transfer Learning for Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Xu, Yang & Peng, Peng & Claramunt, Christophe & Lu, Feng & Yan, Ran, 2024. "Cascading failure modelling in global container shipping network using mass vessel trajectory data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. Stamopoulos, Dimitrios & Dimas, Petros & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2022. "Exploring the structural effects of the ICT sector in the Greek economy: A quantitative approach based on input-output and network analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7).
    20. García-Muñiz, Ana Salomé & Vicente, María Rosalía, 2014. "ICT technologies in Europe: A study of technological diffusion and economic growth under network theory," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 360-370.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3450-:d:1067407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.