IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/rmj000/v13y2000i2p15-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IS Faculty Research Productivity: Influential Factors and Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Hu

    (Florida Atlantic University, USA)

  • T. Grandon Gill

    (Florida Atlantic University, USA)

Abstract

Why are some faculty members more productive than others in academic research? We constructed a number of hypotheses about faculty research productivity based on the life-cycle model of academic research and previous studies. Tests were conducted using data collected via a national survey of information systems (IS) faculty. The results show that while there are only two significant factors contributing positively to the research productivity-the time allocated to research activity and the existence of IS doctoral programs-many other factors appear to have significant adverse effect on research productivity, such as the number of years on faculty, the teaching load when exceeding 11 hours weekly, and non-IS, non-academic employment experience. The results also suggest that some of the commonly proposed influential factors, such as tenure status, academic rank, school type, as well as IS-related employment experience, have no significant effect at all. The implications of these findings and the limitations of the study are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Hu & T. Grandon Gill, 2000. "IS Faculty Research Productivity: Influential Factors and Implications," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 13(2), pages 15-25, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:13:y:2000:i:2:p:15-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/irmj.2000040102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanuel Osafo & Amy Paros & Robert M. Yawson, 2021. "Valence–Instrumentality–Expectancy Model of Motivation as an Alternative Model for Examining Ethical Leadership Behaviors," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    2. Basil, Michael D. & Basil, Debra Z., 2006. "The marketing market: A study of PhD supply, demand, hiring institutions, and job candidates," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(4), pages 516-523, April.
    3. Mary Feeney & Eric Welch, 2014. "Academic outcomes among principal investigators, co-principal investigators, and non-PI researchers," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 111-133, February.
    4. Vikas Mittal & Lawrence Feick & Feisal Murshed, 2008. "Publish and Prosper: The Financial Impact of Publishing by Marketing Faculty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 430-442, 05-06.
    5. Raden Lestari Garnasih, 2017. "Strengthening Research Self-Efficacy and Research Productivity through Research Culture Implementation," GATR Journals jmmr171, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    6. Rebecca Long & Aleta Crawford & Michael White & Kimberly Davis, 2009. "Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 231-260, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:rmj000:v:13:y:2000:i:2:p:15-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.