IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jwltt0/v17y2022i2p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Role of Age and Gender

Author

Listed:
  • Biswajit Acharjya

    (Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, Ahemedabad, India)

  • Simanchala Das

    (Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, Vijayawada, India)

Abstract

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has resulted in the complete disruption of the learning ecosystem across the world. The sudden shift from the class room learning to the use of virtual platforms has not only made an unprecedented impact on the learning style of the students, but has also resulted in the problem of adoption of the same. Thus, with the significant surge in the usage of e-learning mechanism, the researchers even tend to predict the continued usage of the digital learning platforms post pandemic due to its accelerated usage and adoption by the learners and teachers as well across the age and gender. Therefore, the present research seeks to study the factors influencing e-learning adoption by the students in the context of the pandemic. Further, it would examine the moderating influence of age and gender for the adoption of e-learning using the UTAUT model with extended constructs like computer anxiety, attitude, and technology anxiety.

Suggested Citation

  • Biswajit Acharjya & Simanchala Das, 2022. "Adoption of E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Role of Age and Gender," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 17(2), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jwltt0:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJWLTT.20220301.oa4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viswanath Venkatesh & Xiaojun Zhang, 2010. "Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: U.S. Vs. China," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 5-27, January.
    2. Meuter, Matthew L. & Ostrom, Amy L. & Bitner, Mary Jo & Roundtree, Robert, 2003. "The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 899-906, November.
    3. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    4. Editors, 2014. "International Journal of Systems Science," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(12), pages 1-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valentina Panfilova & Valentina Spichak & Anargul Zhumakhanova, 2022. "Educational Mobile Games as a Tool for Increasing Vocabulary When Learning a Foreign Language," International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), IGI Global, vol. 17(1), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Saphiya Mukhametgaliyeva & Alena Gura & Olesya Dudnik & Anastasiya Khudarova, 2022. "The Use of Social Networks in E-Learning Technologies in the Context of Distance Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-12, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Talukder, Md. Shamim & Sorwar, Golam & Bao, Yukun & Ahmed, Jashim Uddin & Palash, Md. Abu Saeed, 2020. "Predicting antecedents of wearable healthcare technology acceptance by elderly: A combined SEM-Neural Network approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Amina Abdinoor & Ulingeta O.L. Mbamba, 2017. "Factors influencing consumers’ adoption of mobile financial services in Tanzania," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1392273-139, January.
    3. Siti Salwa Mohd Ishak & Sidney Newton, 2018. "Testing a Model of User Resistance Towards Technology Adoption in Construction Organizations," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-27, December.
    4. Faqih, Khaled M.S., 2016. "An empirical analysis of factors predicting the behavioral intention to adopt Internet shopping technology among non-shoppers in a developing country context: Does gender matter?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 140-164.
    5. G. M. Azmal Ali Quaosar, 2018. "Adoption of Human Resource Information Systems in Developing Countries: An Empirical Study," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 133-141, April.
    6. Müller-Seitz, Gordon & Dautzenberg, Kirsti & Creusen, Utho & Stromereder, Christine, 2009. "Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 31-39.
    7. Guych Nuryyev & Yu-Ping Wang & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Bih-Shiaw Jaw & Yi-Shien Yeh & Hsien-Tang Lin & Li-Fan Wu, 2020. "Blockchain Technology Adoption Behavior and Sustainability of the Business in Tourism and Hospitality SMEs: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, February.
    8. Garaus, Marion & Wolfsteiner, Elisabeth & Wagner, Udo, 2016. "Shoppers' acceptance and perceptions of electronic shelf labels," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3687-3692.
    9. Han-Jen Niu & Fei-Hsu Sun Hung & Po-Ching Lee & Yensen Ni & Yuhsin Chen, 2023. "Eco-Friendly Transactions: Exploring Mobile Payment Adoption as a Sustainable Consumer Choice in Taiwan and the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Md Shamimul Islam & Noorliza Karia & Mohamed Soliman Mohamed Soliman & Mahmudul Hasan Fouji & Jamshed Khalid & Muhammad Khaleel, 2017. "Adoption of Mobile Banking in Bangladesh: A Conceptual Framework," Review of Social Sciences, LAR Center Press, vol. 2(8), pages 1-8, August.
    11. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    12. El Barachi, May & Salim, Taghreed Abu & Nyadzayo, Munyaradzi W. & Mathew, Sujith & Badewi, Amgad & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph, 2022. "The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    13. Herbjørn Nysveen & Per Egil Pedersen, 2016. "Consumer adoption of RFID-enabled services. Applying an extended UTAUT model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 293-314, April.
    14. Sheng Cheng & Liqun Liu & Ke Li, 2020. "Explaining the Factors Influencing the Individuals’ Continuance Intention to Seek Information on Weibo during Rainstorm Disasters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Malgorzata Solarz & Jacek Adamek, 2021. "Factors Affecting Mobile Banking Adoption in Poland: An Empirical Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 1018-1046.
    16. Selen Balkaya & Ulas Akkucuk, 2021. "Adoption and Use of Learning Management Systems in Education: The Role of Playfulness and Self-Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, January.
    17. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy & Katharina Buhtz & Andreas König, 2018. "Social influence in technology adoption: taking stock and moving forward," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 37-76, February.
    18. Julian M. Müller, 2019. "Comparing Technology Acceptance for Autonomous Vehicles, Battery Electric Vehicles, and Car Sharing—A Study across Europe, China, and North America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-17, August.
    19. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2022. "Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 641-652, January.
    20. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jwltt0:v:17:y:2022:i:2:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.