IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeco00/v20y2022i2p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do Digital Market Platform Hosts Exercise Control Over Sellers?: Digital Market Platform Sellers Control

Author

Listed:
  • Shraddha Nimish Danani

    (Tata Services Ltd., Mumba, India)

  • Janis L. Gogan

    (Bentley University, USA)

  • Prageet Aeron

    (Management Development Institute, Gurgaon, India)

  • Kirti Sharma

    (Management Development Institute, Gurugram, India)

  • Mahadeo Prasad Jaiswal

    (Indian Institute of Management, Sambalpur, India)

Abstract

High speed connectivity, smart mobile devices, social media, and rapidly-proliferating end-user applications have given rise to digital markets. This paper investigates how digital market hosts exercise control over sellers. The authors propose that findings from prior empirical studies informed by control theory in other contexts might not fully apply to digital markets, since these platforms are loosely connected to participants. The three-case study revealed that, similar to controllers in other contexts, digital market hosts do utilize a mix of formal and informal control mechanisms, yet their seller control portfolios also differ importantly from control portfolios in other contexts. This paper presents the study findings, considers questions arising from the findings, and provides a useful foundation for further research that can consider why digital markets entail challenges that give rise to novel control portfolios.

Suggested Citation

  • Shraddha Nimish Danani & Janis L. Gogan & Prageet Aeron & Kirti Sharma & Mahadeo Prasad Jaiswal, 2022. "How Do Digital Market Platform Hosts Exercise Control Over Sellers?: Digital Market Platform Sellers Control," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 20(2), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:20:y:2022:i:2:p:1-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/JECO.300298
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandeep Rustagi & William R. King & Laurie J. Kirsch, 2008. "Predictors of Formal Control Usage in IT Outsourcing Partnerships," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 126-143, June.
    2. Laurie S. Kirsch, 1997. "Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 215-239, September.
    3. Vivek Choudhury & Rajiv Sabherwal, 2003. "Portfolios of Control in Outsourced Software Development Projects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 291-314, September.
    4. Youngjin Yoo & Richard J. Boland & Kalle Lyytinen & Ann Majchrzak, 2012. "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1398-1408, October.
    5. Amrit Tiwana & Benn Konsynski & Ashley A. Bush, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 675-687, December.
    6. Laurie J. Kirsch & V. Sambamurthy & Dong-Gil Ko & Russell L. Purvis, 2002. "Controlling Information Systems Development Projects: The View from the Client," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(4), pages 484-498, April.
    7. de Reuver, Mark & Sørensen, Carsten & Basole, Rahul C., 2018. "The digital platform: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2018. "Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3015-3032, July.
    9. Felin, Teppo & Zenger, Todd R., 2014. "Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 914-925.
    10. Fabian Aulkemeier & Maria-Eugenia Iacob & Jos Hillegersberg, 2019. "Platform-based collaboration in digital ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 597-608, December.
    11. William G. Ouchi, 1979. "A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(9), pages 833-848, September.
    12. Ulrich Remus & Martin Wiener, 2012. "The Amount of Control in Offshore Software Development Projects," Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), IGI Global, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 1985. "Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 134-149, February.
    14. Martin Wiener & Magnus Mähring & Ulrich Remus & Carol Saunders & W. Alec Cram, 2019. "Moving IS Project Control Research into the Digital Era: The “Why” of Control and the Concept of Control Purpose," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1387-1401, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laurie J. Kirsch & Dong-Gil Ko & Mark H. Haney, 2010. "Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 469-489, April.
    2. Alex Estevam & Denis Dennehy & Kieran Conboy, 2022. "Using Flow Tools to Enact Control in Software Development Projects: A Cross-case Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 287-304, February.
    3. Evgheni Croitor & Dominick Werner & Martin Adam & Alexander Benlian, 2022. "Opposing effects of input control and clan control for sellers on e-marketplace platforms," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 201-216, March.
    4. Wessel, Michael & Thies, Ferdinand & Benlian, Alexander, 2015. "The Effects of Relinquishing Control in Platform Ecosystems: Implications from a Policy Change on Kickstarter," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 75205, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    5. Sandeep Rustagi & William R. King & Laurie J. Kirsch, 2008. "Predictors of Formal Control Usage in IT Outsourcing Partnerships," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 126-143, June.
    6. Rob Gleasure & Kieran Conboy & Lorraine Morgan, 2019. "Talking Up a Storm: How Backers Use Public Discourse to Exert Control in Crowdfunded Systems Development Projects," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 447-465, June.
    7. Donghwan Cho, 2019. "Exploring the Ambivalent Effects of Control Modes on Project Performance Dimensions in Software Development Outsourcing," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, January.
    8. Pankaj Nagpal & Andreas I. Nicolaou & Kalle Lyytinen, 2014. "Outsourcing And Market Value Of The Firm: Toward A Comprehensive Model," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(1), pages 19-38, January.
    9. Gregory D. Moody & Laurie J. Kirsch & Sandra A. Slaughter & Brian Kimball Dunn & Qin Weng, 2016. "Facilitating the Transformational: An Exploration of Control in Cyberinfrastructure Projects and the Discovery of Field Control," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 324-346, June.
    10. Huigang Liang & Yajiong Xue & Liansheng Wu, 2013. "Ensuring Employees' IT Compliance: Carrot or Stick?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 279-294, June.
    11. Anandasivam Gopal & Sanjay Gosain, 2010. "Research Note ---The Role of Organizational Controls and Boundary Spanning in Software Development Outsourcing: Implications for Project Performance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 960-982, December.
    12. Likoebe M. Maruping & Viswanath Venkatesh & Ritu Agarwal, 2009. "A Control Theory Perspective on Agile Methodology Use and Changing User Requirements," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 377-399, September.
    13. Donghwan Cho, 2019. "Exploring the Ambivalent Effects of Control Modes on Project Performance Dimensions in Software Development Outsourcing," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, January.
    14. Martin Wiener & Magnus Mähring & Ulrich Remus & Carol Saunders & W. Alec Cram, 2019. "Moving IS Project Control Research into the Digital Era: The “Why” of Control and the Concept of Control Purpose," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1387-1401, December.
    15. Liu, Shan & Wang, Lin & Huang, Wei (Wayne), 2017. "Effects of process and outcome controls on business process outsourcing performance: Moderating roles of vendor and client capability risks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1115-1128.
    16. Laurie J. Kirsch, 2004. "Deploying Common Systems Globally: The Dynamics of Control," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 374-395, December.
    17. Liu, Shan & Deng, Zhaohua, 2015. "How environment risks moderate the effect of control on performance in information technology projects: Perspectives of project managers and user liaisons," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 80-97.
    18. Christian Jung-Gehling & Erik Strauss, 2018. "A Contemporary Concept of Organizational Control: Its Dependence on Shared Values and Impact on Motivation," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 70(4), pages 341-374, November.
    19. Downes, Rebecca & Daellenbach, Urs & Donnelly, Noelle, 2023. "Remote control: Attitude monitoring and informal control in distributed teams," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Jahyun Goo, 2010. "Structure of service level agreements (SLA) in IT outsourcing: The construct and its measurement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 185-205, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeco00:v:20:y:2022:i:2:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.