IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v6y2012i7p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transportation Planning Survey Methodologies for the Proposed Study of Physical and Socio-economic Development of Deprived Rural Regions: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur
  • Madzlan Napiah
  • Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio
  • Shabir Hussain Khahro

Abstract

Transportation is considered as an essential part of human life and backbone of national, regional and local economy. Transportation sector plays a crucial role in boosting up the life styles of common men by providing facilities and accessibilities as required to them. Deprived rural regions are always struggling from services and facilities aspects due to their remote and scattered locations. Transportation is a tool, which can mitigate rural regional problems by providing proper accessibilities and links to employment, health, education and services. The proposed study objective is to provide accessibility and proper transportation services to these rural regions. For this purpose regional transportation policy plan is required, which can’t be formulated without relevant and quality data. The purpose of this paper is to review different surveys methodologies, which are essential for data collection. Different techniques have been reviewed including face-to-face interviews, telephonic interviews, web and postal survey methodologies, pilot survey, participatory rural appraisals and household surveys. It is concluded that during study primary as well as secondary data can be used. This exercise can save time and other crucial resources. The data can be used for the development of transportation policy for the study area. This plan can be helpful in bringing prosperity, mitigating poverty and uplifting the living standards of common men in these deprived regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Madzlan Napiah & Imtiaz Ahmed Chandio & Shabir Hussain Khahro, 2012. "Transportation Planning Survey Methodologies for the Proposed Study of Physical and Socio-economic Development of Deprived Rural Regions: A Review," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(7), pages 1-1, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:6:y:2012:i:7:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/16925/11960
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/16925
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patrick Bonnel, 2003. "Postal, Telephone and Face-to-face Surveys : How Comparable Are They?," Post-Print halshs-00091025, HAL.
    2. Patrick Bonnel & Michel Le Nir, 1998. "The quality of survey data: Telephone versus face-to-face interviews," Post-Print halshs-00140887, HAL.
    3. Chen, Anthony & Yang, Hai & Lo, Hong K. & Tang, Wilson H., 2002. "Capacity reliability of a road network: an assessment methodology and numerical results," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 225-252, March.
    4. Ison, R. L. & Ampt, P. R., 1992. "Rapid rural appraisal: A participatory problem formulation method relevant to Australian agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 363-386.
    5. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2012. "Combining web and face-to-face in travel surveys: comparability challenges?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1147-1171, November.
    6. Nielsen, Jytte Seested, 2011. "Use of the Internet for willingness-to-pay surveys: A comparison of face-to-face and web-based interviews," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 119-129, January.
    7. Porter, Gina, 2002. "Living in a Walking World: Rural Mobility and Social Equity Issues in Sub-Saharan Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 285-300, February.
    8. Stopher, Peter R. & Greaves, Stephen P., 2007. "Household travel surveys: Where are we going?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 367-381, June.
    9. Yin Zhang, 2000. "Using the Internet for survey research: A case study," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 51(1), pages 57-68.
    10. Chambers, Robert, 1994. "The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 953-969, July.
    11. Edith de Leeuw, 2001. "Reducing Missing Data in Surveys: An Overview of Methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 147-160, May.
    12. Cynthia Chen & Patricia Mokhtarian, 2006. "Tradeoffs between Time Allocations to Maintenance Activities/Travel and Discretionary Activities/Travel," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 223-240, May.
    13. repec:ipt:iptwpa:jrc47967 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2012. "Combining web and face-to-face in travel surveys: comparability challenges?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1147-1171, November.
    2. Hubert Verreault & Catherine Morency, 2018. "Integration of a phone-based household travel survey and a web-based student travel survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 89-103, January.
    3. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2015. "How to Combine Survey Media (Web, Telephone, Face-to-Face): Lyon and Rhône-alps Case Study," Post-Print halshs-01663683, HAL.
    4. Patrick Bonnel & Etienne Hombourger & Ana-Maria Olteanu-Raimond & Zbigniew Smoreda, 2015. "Passive Mobile Phone Dataset to Construct Origin-destination Matrix: Potentials and Limitations," Post-Print halshs-01664219, HAL.
    5. Caroline Bayart & Patrick Bonnel, 2010. "Web and face-to-face travel surveys: how comparable are they? [Enquête déplacements web - face-à-face : quelle comparabilité ?]," Post-Print halshs-00566236, HAL.
    6. Mariem Fekih & Tom Bellemans & Zbigniew Smoreda & Patrick Bonnel & Angelo Furno & Stéphane Galland, 2021. "A data-driven approach for origin–destination matrix construction from cellular network signalling data: a case study of Lyon region (France)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1671-1702, August.
    7. Patrick Bonnel & Caroline Bayart & Brett Smith, 2015. "Workshop Synthesis: Comparing and Combining Survey Modes," Post-Print halshs-01663724, HAL.
    8. Zawojska, Ewa & Czajkowski, Mikotaj, 2017. "Are preferences stated in web vs. personal interviews different? A comparison of willingness to pay results for a large multi-country study of the Baltic Sea eutrophication reduction," Annual Meeting, 2017, June 18-21, Montreal, Canada 258604, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society.
    9. World Bank Group, 2012. "Understanding Access to Justice and Conflict Resolution at the Local Level in the Central African Republic," World Bank Publications - Reports 16097, The World Bank Group.
    10. Mengying Cui & David Levinson, 2018. "Accessibility analysis of risk severity," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1029-1050, July.
    11. Shenggen Fan & Xiaobo Zhang, 2008. "Public Expenditure, Growth and Poverty Reduction in Rural Uganda," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 20(3), pages 466-496.
    12. Kevin J. Boyle & Mark Morrison & Darla Hatton MacDonald & Roderick Duncan & John Rose, 2016. "Investigating Internet and Mail Implementation of Stated-Preference Surveys While Controlling for Differences in Sample Frames," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 64(3), pages 401-419, July.
    13. Stephanie F. Stefanski & Jay P. Shimshack, 2016. "Valuing Marine Biodiversity in the Gulf of Mexico: Evidence from the Proposed Boundary Expansion of the Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(2), pages 211-232.
    14. Jara-Díaz, Sergio & Rosales-Salas, Jorge, 2017. "Beyond transport time: A review of time use modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 209-230.
    15. Jean‐Francois Trani & Megan Giesecke & Peter Hovmand & Nicholas Miller & Mary Kate Cartmill & Nicandro Mandujano Acevedo & Sandra Lee & William Liem & Braveheart Gillani & Ganesh Babulal, 2024. "Ageing among Black and non‐Hispanic White older adults: A community‐based system dynamics approach to examining quality of life," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(1), pages 30-51, January.
    16. Eastwood, C.R. & Turner, F.J. & Romera, A.J., 2022. "Farmer-centred design: An affordances-based framework for identifying processes that facilitate farmers as co-designers in addressing complex agricultural challenges," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    17. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, DJ & Kote, Thejovardhana & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2011. "The Quantified Traveler: Using personal travel data to promote sustainable transport behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9jg0p1rj, University of California Transportation Center.
    18. A. Fleming & S. Agrawal & Dinomika & Y. Fransisca & L. Graham & S. Lestari & D. Mendham & D. O’Connell & B. Paul & M. Po & A. Rawluk & N. Sakuntaladewi & B. Winarno & T. W. Yuwati, 2021. "Reflections on integrated research from community engagement in peatland restoration," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Zhang, Fang & Lu, Jian & Hu, Xiaojian & Meng, Qiang, 2023. "Integrated deployment of dedicated lane and roadside unit considering uncertain road capacity under the mixed-autonomy traffic environment," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Chèze, Benoît & David, Maia & Martinet, Vincent, 2020. "Understanding farmers' reluctance to reduce pesticide use: A choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:6:y:2012:i:7:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.