IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/masjnl/v10y2016i3p155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Dry Ports to Facilitate International Trade in Iran; A Model of Success Factors for Implementation of Dry Ports

Author

Listed:
  • Sayyed Hassan Hatami Nasab
  • Ali Sanayei
  • S. F. Amiri Aghdaei
  • Ali Kazemi

Abstract

As coastal production costs in many countries, producers are moving inland to remain competitive with othercountries. Also, container transport volumes continue to grow, the sea flow generates almost proportional inlandflow; the links with hinterland will become critical factors for the seaports functionality. Development of dryports is an important part of intermodal transport which play an important role in improving hinterlands.Successful implementation dry port depends on identification and description of required capabilities to developadvanced intermediate terminal, discover existing deficiency in these capabilities and their effects of each other.This article fill the gaps of implementation of dry ports by offering a conceptual model. To do so, this currentstudy is done in a complicated process in five stages of- review of literature, Delphi, Gap analysis, fuzzyDematel and Structural equation modeling (SEM). 17 indexes of Delphi model were extracted and classified in 8groups. The identified gap and causal relations enabled presentation of a model which was tested and verified byPartial Least Squares (PLS).

Suggested Citation

  • Sayyed Hassan Hatami Nasab & Ali Sanayei & S. F. Amiri Aghdaei & Ali Kazemi, 2016. "Using Dry Ports to Facilitate International Trade in Iran; A Model of Success Factors for Implementation of Dry Ports," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 155-155, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:10:y:2016:i:3:p:155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/download/57806/30917
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/mas/article/view/57806
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Violeta Roso & Kent Lumsden, 2010. "A review of dry ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 12(2), pages 196-213, June.
    2. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.
    3. Monios, Jason, 2011. "The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-66.
    4. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos & Liu, Miaojia, 2006. "The economic viability of container mega-ships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 21-41, January.
    5. Marielle Christiansen & Kjetil Fagerholt & David Ronen, 2004. "Ship Routing and Scheduling: Status and Perspectives," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 1-18, February.
    6. M. C. Moura O & M. V. Pato & A. C. Paixa O, 2002. "Ship assignment with hub and spoke constraints," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 135-150, April.
    7. Pettit, S.J., 2008. "United Kingdom ports policy: Changing government attitudes," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 719-727, July.
    8. Kim, Kap Hwan & Moon, Kyung Chan, 2003. "Berth scheduling by simulated annealing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 541-560, July.
    9. Notteboom Theo E., 2004. "Container Shipping And Ports: An Overview," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Hansen, Pierre & Oguz, Ceyda & Mladenovic, Nenad, 2008. "Variable neighborhood search for minimum cost berth allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 636-649, December.
    11. Ross Robinson, 2002. "Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 241-255.
    12. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Liao, Chun-Hsiung & Tseng, Po-Hsing & Cullinane, Kevin & Lu, Chin-Shan, 2010. "The impact of an emerging port on the carbon dioxide emissions of inland container transport: An empirical study of Taipei port," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 5251-5257, September.
    14. Alfred J. Baird *, 2004. "Public goods and the public financing of major European seaports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 375-391, October.
    15. J-F Cordeau & G Laporte & A Mercier, 2001. "A unified tabu search heuristic for vehicle routing problems with time windows," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 52(8), pages 928-936, August.
    16. Theo E. Notteboom & Willy Winkelmans, 2001. "Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge?," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 71-89, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. Wilmsmeier, Gordon & Monios, Jason & Lambert, Bruce, 2011. "The directional development of intermodal freight corridors in relation to inland terminals," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1379-1386.
    3. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2012. "Giving a direction to port regionalisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1551-1561.
    4. Yang, Dong & Notteboom, Theo & Zhou, Xin, 2021. "Spatial, temporal and institutional characteristics of entry strategies in inland container terminals: A comparison between Yangtze River and Rhine River," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    5. Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte & Pasquale Legato & Luigi Moccia, 2005. "Models and Tabu Search Heuristics for the Berth-Allocation Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 526-538, November.
    6. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.
    7. Amir Gharehgozli & Nima Zaerpour & Rene Koster, 2020. "Container terminal layout design: transition and future," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 610-639, December.
    8. Bask, Anu & Roso, Violeta & Andersson, Dan & Hämäläinen, Erkki, 2014. "Development of seaport–dry port dyads: two cases from Northern Europe," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 85-95.
    9. Nguyen Khoi Tran & Hans-Dietrich Haasis & Tobias Buer, 2017. "Container shipping route design incorporating the costs of shipping, inland/feeder transport, inventory and CO2 emission," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(4), pages 667-694, December.
    10. Monios, Jason & Wilmsmeier, Gordon, 2013. "The role of intermodal transport in port regionalisation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 161-172.
    11. Heaver, Trevor, 2006. "The Evolution and Challenges of Port Economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-41, January.
    12. Notteboom, Theo E., 2010. "Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: an update," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 567-583.
    13. Erica Varese & Danilo Stefano Marigo & Mariarosaria Lombardi, 2020. "Dry Port: A Review on Concept, Classification, Functionalities and Technological Processes," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-16, November.
    14. de Almeida Rodrigues, Thiago & Maria de Miranda Mota, Caroline & Manuele dos Santos, Inez, 2021. "Determining dry port criteria that support decision making," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. van Asperen, E. & Dekker, R., 2010. "Flexibility in Port Selection: A Quantitative Approach Using Floating Stocks," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2009-44, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    16. Flämig, Heike & Hesse, Markus, 2011. "Placing dryports. Port regionalization as a planning challenge – The case of Hamburg, Germany, and the Süderelbe," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 42-50.
    17. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2020. "Dry ports: research outcomes, trends, and future implications," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 265-292, June.
    18. Alena Khaslavskaya & Violeta Roso, 2019. "Outcome-Driven Supply Chain Perspective on Dry Ports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.
    19. Cullinane, Kevin & Talley, Wayne K., 2006. "Introduction," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, January.
    20. Roso, Violeta & Woxenius, Johan & Lumsden, Kenth, 2009. "The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(5), pages 338-345.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:masjnl:v:10:y:2016:i:3:p:155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.