IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v9y2017i6p107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Networks and Social Interaction among People with Psychiatric Disabilities-Comparison of Users of Day Centres and Clubhouses

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Hultqvist
  • Urban Markström
  • Carina Tjörnstrand
  • Mona Eklund

Abstract

OBJECTIVE- The aim of the study was to compare users of community-based mental health day centres (DCs) and clubhouses in Sweden regarding reported social networks and social interaction and the stability of these over time. A further aim was to investigate social network predictors both cross-sectionally and longitudinally.METHODS- People regularly attending DCs (n=128) or clubhouses (n=57) completed questionnaires about social network and social interaction (social engagement and social functioning), self-esteem and socio-demographics at baseline and a nine-month follow-up. RESULTS- Perceived social engagement and social functioning did not differ between the groups and remained stable over time. Fewer in the DC reported having a close friend but there was no difference regarding having recently (the past week) seen a friend. When naming “someone with whom you can share your innermost thoughts and feelings”, the DC group named more professional contacts, fewer friends and more often “nobody” compared to the clubhouse group. Finally, on both occasions the DC group scored significantly lower on size of the social network compared to the clubhouse users. Self-esteem and having recently seen a friend could predict size of the social network in the cross-sectional perspective. Strong indicators of belonging to the group with a larger social network at follow-up were being a woman, attending a clubhouse programme and having scored high on social network at baseline.CONCLUSION & IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE- Having friends and strengthening one’s self-esteem may be essential factors for the social network of people with psychiatric disabilities in a short-term perspective. Visiting clubhouses seems advantageous in a longer-term perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Hultqvist & Urban Markström & Carina Tjörnstrand & Mona Eklund, 2017. "Social Networks and Social Interaction among People with Psychiatric Disabilities-Comparison of Users of Day Centres and Clubhouses," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 107-107, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/62507/34739
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/62507
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Topor & M. Borg & S. Di Girolamo & L. Davidson, 2011. "Not Just an Individual Journey: Social Aspects of Recovery," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(1), pages 90-99, January.
    2. Elisabeth Argentzell & Christel Leufstadius & Mona Eklund, 2014. "Social interaction among people with psychiatric disabilities – Does attending a day centre matter?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(6), pages 519-527, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suvi Raitakari & Suvi Holmberg & Kirsi Juhila & Jenni-Mari Räsänen, 2018. "Constructing the Elements of the “Recovery in” Model through Positive Assessments during Mental Health Home Visits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Mona Sommer & Stian Biong & Marit Borg & Bengt Karlsson & Trude Klevan & Ottar Ness & Linda Nesse & Jeppe Oute & Rolf Sundet & Hesook Suzie Kim, 2021. "Part II: Living Life: A Meta-Synthesis Exploring Recovery as Processual Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Alain Topor & David Matscheck, 2021. "Diversity, Complexity and Ordinality: Mental Health Services Outside the Institutions—Service Users’ and Professionals’ Experience-Based Practices and Knowledges, and New Public Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Lotte Groth Jensen & Stina Lou & Jørgen Aagaard & Ulla Væggemose, 2017. "Community families: A qualitative study of families who volunteer to support persons with severe mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(1), pages 33-39, February.
    5. Nicola Hancock & Bridget Berry & Michelle Banfield & Georgia Pike-Rowney & Justin Newton Scanlan & Sarah Norris, 2022. "Peer Worker-Supported Transition from Hospital to Home—Outcomes for Service Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Cameron Duff, 2016. "Atmospheres of recovery: Assemblages of health," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(1), pages 58-74, January.
    7. Janne Brammer Damsgaard & Anita Jensen, 2021. "Music Activities and Mental Health Recovery: Service Users’ Perspectives Presented in the CHIME Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Ida Marie Skou Storm & Anne Kathrine Kousgaard Mikkelsen & Mari Holen & Lisbeth Hybholt & Stephen Fitzgerald Austin & Lene Lauge Berring, 2023. "Social Processes of Young Adults’ Recovery and Identity Formation during Life-Disruptive Mental Distress—A Meta-Ethnography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Robyn M Martin & Sophie C Ridley & Sue J Gillieatt, 2017. "Family inclusion in mental health services: Reality or rhetoric?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(6), pages 480-487, September.
    10. Lise Katrine Jepsen Trangsrud & Marit Borg & Solfrid Bratland-Sanda & Trude Klevan, 2020. "Embodying Experiences with Nature in Everyday Life Recovery for Persons with Eating Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.