IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i7p1441-d156907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Constructing the Elements of the “Recovery in” Model through Positive Assessments during Mental Health Home Visits

Author

Listed:
  • Suvi Raitakari

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere 33014, Finland)

  • Suvi Holmberg

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere 33014, Finland)

  • Kirsi Juhila

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere 33014, Finland)

  • Jenni-Mari Räsänen

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere 33014, Finland)

Abstract

The study provides a categorization of the different elements of the “recovery in” model (RIM). The objective is to analyze elements of RIM in positive assessments during home visit interactions. RIM approaches mental illness as a long-term condition that people live with in their daily lives in their communities. The model emphasizes the rights of all citizens to be full members of their communities regardless of their mental health problems or other difficulties. Positive assessments are professionals’ encouraging evaluations of the activities, situations, or inner conditions expressed by the clients. They are essential in creating supportive professional-client communication. The data analyzed in this study consists of 17 audio-recorded home visits of 10 different clients. Home visits were provided by a mental health floating support service in 2012. The data was analyzed using coding and ethnomethodological interaction research (EIR). As a result RIM is divided into two upper-categories: “Encouraging Doing the Right Thing” and “Encouraging the Right Kind of Personal Growth”. These categories include a wide spectrum of elements that are relevant for the client’s agency in the community. The elements embed the client’s performance in everyday routines and the client’s progress in becoming a skillful, knowledgeable, and involved agent in the community. The categorization of the elements of RIM could be used in educating practitioners to identify and operationalize RIM in mental health home visits.

Suggested Citation

  • Suvi Raitakari & Suvi Holmberg & Kirsi Juhila & Jenni-Mari Räsänen, 2018. "Constructing the Elements of the “Recovery in” Model through Positive Assessments during Mental Health Home Visits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1441-:d:156907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1441/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1441/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pauline Rhenter & Delphine Moreau & Christian Laval & Jean Mantovani & Amandine Albisson & Guillaume Suderie & French Housing First Study Group & Mohamed Boucekine & Aurelie Tinland & Sandrine Loubièr, 2018. "Bread and Shoulders: Reversing the Downward Spiral, a Qualitative Analyses of the Effects of a Housing First-Type Program in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. A. Topor & M. Borg & S. Di Girolamo & L. Davidson, 2011. "Not Just an Individual Journey: Social Aspects of Recovery," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(1), pages 90-99, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mona Sommer & Stian Biong & Marit Borg & Bengt Karlsson & Trude Klevan & Ottar Ness & Linda Nesse & Jeppe Oute & Rolf Sundet & Hesook Suzie Kim, 2021. "Part II: Living Life: A Meta-Synthesis Exploring Recovery as Processual Experiences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Alain Topor & David Matscheck, 2021. "Diversity, Complexity and Ordinality: Mental Health Services Outside the Institutions—Service Users’ and Professionals’ Experience-Based Practices and Knowledges, and New Public Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Lotte Groth Jensen & Stina Lou & Jørgen Aagaard & Ulla Væggemose, 2017. "Community families: A qualitative study of families who volunteer to support persons with severe mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(1), pages 33-39, February.
    4. Jenny Hultqvist & Urban Markström & Carina Tjörnstrand & Mona Eklund, 2017. "Social Networks and Social Interaction among People with Psychiatric Disabilities-Comparison of Users of Day Centres and Clubhouses," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(6), pages 107-107, June.
    5. Nicola Hancock & Bridget Berry & Michelle Banfield & Georgia Pike-Rowney & Justin Newton Scanlan & Sarah Norris, 2022. "Peer Worker-Supported Transition from Hospital to Home—Outcomes for Service Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Cameron Duff, 2016. "Atmospheres of recovery: Assemblages of health," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(1), pages 58-74, January.
    7. Janne Brammer Damsgaard & Anita Jensen, 2021. "Music Activities and Mental Health Recovery: Service Users’ Perspectives Presented in the CHIME Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Ida Marie Skou Storm & Anne Kathrine Kousgaard Mikkelsen & Mari Holen & Lisbeth Hybholt & Stephen Fitzgerald Austin & Lene Lauge Berring, 2023. "Social Processes of Young Adults’ Recovery and Identity Formation during Life-Disruptive Mental Distress—A Meta-Ethnography," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Robyn M Martin & Sophie C Ridley & Sue J Gillieatt, 2017. "Family inclusion in mental health services: Reality or rhetoric?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(6), pages 480-487, September.
    10. Lise Katrine Jepsen Trangsrud & Marit Borg & Solfrid Bratland-Sanda & Trude Klevan, 2020. "Embodying Experiences with Nature in Everyday Life Recovery for Persons with Eating Disorders," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-17, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1441-:d:156907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.