IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v10y2018i12p156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Women’s Knowledge of Health Promotion in the Prevention of Breast and Cervical Cancer in Oshakati Health District, Namibia

Author

Listed:
  • Saara Suoma Iita
  • Agnes Van Dyk
  • Wilma Wilkinson
  • Olivia N Tuhadeleni

Abstract

PURPOSE- The study aimed to explore and describe the knowledge of women regarding health promotion in the prevention of breast and cervical cancer. This study was carried out in the Oshakati district at the Intermediate Hospital Oshakati. METHODOLOGY- A quantitative approach was used for this study. This approach was chosen in order to provide a comprehensive picture and understanding of the women’s knowledge or awareness of health promotion in the prevention of breast and cervical cancer. The study population consisted of all women of child-bearing age, aged 15 to 49, in the Oshakati health district, that is, 41,985. The research sample was identified as 10% of the study population, thus numbering 419 respondents. The researcher personally distributed 419 questionnaires to every second woman of child-bearing age admitted to the Intermediate Hospital Oshakati. RESULTS- The findings indicate that awareness of information relating to breast and cervical cancer exists in Oshakati Health District. However, overall knowledge on the causes of breast and cervical cancer, risk factors for breast cancer and warning signs of cervical cancer was very poor. The findings also revealed that while many respondents were informed about breast self-examination (BSE) and had practised it, very few respondents acknowledged clinical breast examination (CBE) attendance once a year, or the use of mammography and sonar attendance as additional screening methods. RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSION- Based on the findings the study recommends that women should share information with their peers; in addition, radio should be used to disseminate such information as it is the most reliable source of information in the rural areas. Information, education and communication materials on the prevention of breast and cervical cancer should be developed and disseminated to the public. Women should be encouraged to develop a reading culture in order to increase their knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Saara Suoma Iita & Agnes Van Dyk & Wilma Wilkinson & Olivia N Tuhadeleni, 2018. "Women’s Knowledge of Health Promotion in the Prevention of Breast and Cervical Cancer in Oshakati Health District, Namibia," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(12), pages 156-156, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/37642/37992
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/37642
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N/A, 2001. "Research in Progress," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(4), pages 907-910, July.
    2. N/A, 2001. "Research in Progress," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 54(3), pages 725-728, April.
    3. N/A, 2001. "Research in Progress," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 55(1), pages 186-187, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sally Brooks, 2013. "Investing in Food Security? Philanthrocapitalism, Biotechnology and Development," SPRU Working Paper Series 2013-12, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    2. Francesca Modena & Concetta Rondinelli & Fabio Sabatini, 2014. "Economic Insecurity and Fertility Intentions: The Case of Italy," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(S1), pages 233-255, May.
    3. Patricia Dinis Mota da Costa & Luisa De Sousa Lobo Borges de Araujo, 2016. "Digital Reading in PISA 2012 and ICT Uses: How do VET and General Education Students Perform?," JRC Research Reports JRC104713, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Gawel, Erik & Lehmann, Paul & Strunz, Sebastian & Heuson, Clemens, 2016. "A public choice framework for climate adaptation: Barriers to efficient adaptation and lessons learned from German flood disasters," UFZ Discussion Papers 3/2016, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    5. Eucharia Nchedo Aye & Innocent Kama & Theresa Olunwa Oforka & Celestine Okwudili Eze & Ngozi Eucharia Eze & Julia Amobi Onumonu & Ngozi Hope Chinweuba & Immaculata Nwakaego Akaneme, 2019. "Family Leadership Styles and Deviant Behaviours of Primary School Pupils in Enugu State, Nigeria," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 113-113, July.
    6. Gehlert, Tina & Kramer, Christiane & Nielsen, Otto Anker & Schlag, Bernhard, 2011. "Socioeconomic differences in public acceptability and car use adaptation towards urban road pricing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 685-694, September.
    7. Emily Levitt & Rebecca Stoltzfus & David Pelletier & Alice Pell, 2009. "A community food system analysis as formative research for a comprehensive anemia control program in Northern Afghanistan," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(2), pages 177-195, June.
    8. Pop Zenovia Cristiana & Maier Veronica, "undated". "Entrepreneurial Activity Within Enterprises," Description: Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society 42, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Babes-Bolyai University.
    9. López Bóo, Florencia, 2010. "Returns to Education and Macroeconomic Shocks: Evidence from Argentina," IZA Discussion Papers 4753, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:10:y:2018:i:12:p:156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.