IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/riafin/v6y2013i5p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design Of A Methodology For The Implementation Of An Electronic Knowledge Repository, Diseio De Una Metodologia Para La Implementacion De Un Repositorio Electronico De Conocimiento

Author

Listed:
  • Aracely Madrid
  • Raime Bustos
  • Jonathan Ortiz
  • Antonio Rios

Abstract

The current document presents the design of a methodology for the implementation of a model for an electronics repository that allows the maximum knowledge transfer. The objects of study are the personal of the Santander´s Observatories Federation, manufacturers and Universities on America, Europe and Africa. The result of the research is a methodology of implementation composed for five phases: Valuation, Decision Making, Design and Development and Performance Evaluation. This methodology is evaluated through the examination of specialized theory, experts´ criteria and the practical implementation. The results shown that the experts match with a concordance coefficient ANOCHI of 0.82, it means that the methodology has a strong theory foundation, furthermore, the definition of the phases and their logical sequence is appropriate and feasible and cost effective to implement. In addition, a study is driven based an electronic repository that is developed and implemented following the proposed methodology and compared with another that do not follows the methodology, the results of the evaluation shows that the repository with the proposed methodology is best accepted for the users. As conclusion, the methodology is feasible to implement in a repository and successful to improve the transfer of knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Aracely Madrid & Raime Bustos & Jonathan Ortiz & Antonio Rios, 2013. "Design Of A Methodology For The Implementation Of An Electronic Knowledge Repository, Diseio De Una Metodologia Para La Implementacion De Un Repositorio Electronico De Conocimiento," Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 6(5), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:riafin:v:6:y:2013:i:5:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/riafin/riaf-v6n5-2013/RIAF-V6N5-2013-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Héliot, YingFei & Riley, Michael, 2010. "A study of indicators of willingness in the knowledge transfer process," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 399-410, July.
    2. Gilles Balmisse & Denis Meingan & Katia Passerini, 2007. "Technology Trends in Knowledge Management Tools," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 3(2), pages 118-131, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Papadopoulos, Thanos & Stamati, Teta & Nopparuch, Pawit, 2013. "Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 133-146.
    2. Hammami, Hajer & Amara, Nabil & Landry, Réjean, 2013. "Organizational climate and its influence on brokers’ knowledge transfer activities: A structural equation modeling," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 105-118.
    3. Usman Ghani & Timothy Teo & Yan Li & Muhammad Usman & Zia Ul Islam & Habib Gul & Rana Muhammad Naeem & Humera Bahadar & Jing Yuan & Xuesong Zhai, 2020. "Tit for Tat: Abusive Supervision and Knowledge Hiding-The Role of Psychological Contract Breach and Psychological Ownership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Knowledge Transfer; Electronic Knowledge Repositories;

    JEL classification:

    • A29 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Other
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:riafin:v:6:y:2013:i:5:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.