IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i4p1240-d320881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tit for Tat: Abusive Supervision and Knowledge Hiding-The Role of Psychological Contract Breach and Psychological Ownership

Author

Listed:
  • Usman Ghani

    (College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China)

  • Timothy Teo

    (School of Education, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Western Australia)

  • Yan Li

    (College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China)

  • Muhammad Usman

    (Department of Management Sciences, Preston University, Kohat 26000, Pakistan)

  • Zia Ul Islam

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Habib Gul

    (Business School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Rana Muhammad Naeem

    (School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Humera Bahadar

    (Department of Management Sciences, Hazara University, Mansehra 21120, Pakistan)

  • Jing Yuan

    (School of Foreign Study, Anhui Sanlian University, Hefei 230026, China)

  • Xuesong Zhai

    (College of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China)

Abstract

The extant literature has focused on individuals’ knowledge-sharing behavior and its driving factors, which stimulate the knowledge transmission and exchange in organizations. However, little research has focused on factors that inhibit knowledge sharing and encourage individuals to hide their knowledge. Therefore, based on social exchange and displaced aggression theories, the study proposed and checked a model that examined the effect of abusive supervision on knowledge hiding (KH) via a psychological contract breach (PCB). The Psychological ownership was regarded as a boundary condition on abusive supervision and KH relationship. Using a time-lagged method, we recruited 344 full-time employees enrolled in an executive development program in a large university in China. The findings show that PCB mediates the association between abusive supervision and KH. Similarly, psychological ownership moderates the association between abusive supervision and KH. Employees with high psychological ownership minimized the effect of abusive supervision on KH. Based on study findings, contributions to theory and practice, limitations, and future directions are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Usman Ghani & Timothy Teo & Yan Li & Muhammad Usman & Zia Ul Islam & Habib Gul & Rana Muhammad Naeem & Humera Bahadar & Jing Yuan & Xuesong Zhai, 2020. "Tit for Tat: Abusive Supervision and Knowledge Hiding-The Role of Psychological Contract Breach and Psychological Ownership," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-16, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1240-:d:320881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1240/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/4/1240/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Héliot, YingFei & Riley, Michael, 2010. "A study of indicators of willingness in the knowledge transfer process," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 399-410, July.
    2. James Avey & Tara Wernsing & Michael Palanski, 2012. "Exploring the Process of Ethical Leadership: The Mediating Role of Employee Voice and Psychological Ownership," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 21-34, April.
    3. Paul A. Pavlou & Omar A. El Sawy, 2006. "From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 198-227, September.
    4. Peng, Kelly Z. & Wong, Chi-Sum & Song, Jiwen Lynda, 2016. "How do Chinese employees react to psychological contract violation?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 815-825.
    5. Shubo Liu & Qianlin ZHU & Feng Wei, 2019. "How Abusive Supervision Affects Employees’ Unethical Behaviors: A Moderated Mediation Examination of Turnover Intentions and Caring Climate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Sidra Riaz & Yusen Xu & Shahid Hussain, 2019. "Workplace Ostracism and Knowledge Hiding: The Mediating Role of Job Tension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Zubair Akram & Yan Li & Umair Akram, 2019. "When Employees are Emotionally Exhausted Due to Abusive Supervision. A Conservation-of-Resources Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Rogozińska-Pawełczyk & Katarzyna Gadomska-Lila, 2022. "The Mediating Role of Organisational Identification between Psychological Contract and Work Results: An Individual Level Investigation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Heetae Park & Wonseok Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2020. "When Is the Negative Effect of Abusive Supervision on Task Performance Mitigated? An Empirical Study of Public Service Officers in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-10, June.
    3. Gonçalves, Tiago & Curado, Carla & Oliveira, Mírian, 2023. "Clarifying knowledge withholding: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Zhen Chen & Zixin Tang, 2024. "The effect of caring ethical climate on employees’ knowledge-hiding behavior: evidence from Chinese construction firms," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heetae Park & Wonseok Choi & Seung-Wan Kang, 2020. "When Is the Negative Effect of Abusive Supervision on Task Performance Mitigated? An Empirical Study of Public Service Officers in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-10, June.
    2. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    3. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    4. Yidong Tu & Xinxin Lu & Yue Yu, 2017. "Supervisors’ Ethical Leadership and Employee Job Satisfaction: A Social Cognitive Perspective," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 229-245, February.
    5. Michael K. Fung, 2019. "Fraudulent Financial Reporting and Technological Capability in the Information Technology Sector: A Resource-Based Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(2), pages 577-589, May.
    6. Tran Quang Bao Phuc & Khalida Parveen & Duyen Thi Truc Tran & Dao Thi Anh Nguyen, 2021. "The linkage between ethical leadership and lecturer job satisfaction at a private higher education institution in Vietnam," Journal of Social Sciences Advancement, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 39-50.
    7. Abhipsa Pal & Tejaswini Herath & Rahul De’ & H. Raghav Rao, 2021. "Is the Convenience Worth the Risk? An Investigation of Mobile Payment Usage," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 941-961, August.
    8. Dan Yang & Weili Yin & Sen Liu & Felix T. S. Chan, 2022. "Understanding the Effect of Multi-Agent Collaboration on the Performance of Logistics Park Projects: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Samuel Hunter, 2012. "(Un)Ethical Leadership and Identity: What Did We Learn and Where Do We Go from Here?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 107(1), pages 79-87, April.
    10. Rogier van de Wetering & Sherah Kurnia & Svyatoslav Kotusev, 2020. "The Effect of Enterprise Architecture Deployment Practices on Organizational Benefits: A Dynamic Capability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Lee, Ho & Kim, Moon Sun & Kim, Kyung Kyu, 2014. "Interorganizational information systems visibility and supply chain performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 285-295.
    12. Lingling Gao & Kerem Aksel Waechter, 0. "Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    13. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Chang, Kuo-Hsiung & Chen, Yung-ray & Huang, Hsu-Feng, 2015. "Information technology and partnership dynamic capabilities in international subcontracting relationships," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 276-286.
    15. Chenghao Men & Patrick S. W. Fong & Weiwei Huo & Jing Zhong & Ruiqian Jia & Jinlian Luo, 2020. "Ethical Leadership and Knowledge Hiding: A Moderated Mediation Model of Psychological Safety and Mastery Climate," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 461-472, October.
    16. Jose Benitez & Laura Ruiz & Ana Castillo & Javier Llorens, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: The role of social media capability," Post-Print hal-02462583, HAL.
    17. Alyson Byrne & Julian Barling & Kathryne Dupré, 2014. "Leader Apologies and Employee and Leader Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(1), pages 91-106, April.
    18. Rohit Aggarwal & David Kryscynski & Harpreet Singh, 2015. "Evaluating Venture Technical Competence in Venture Capitalist Investment Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2685-2706, November.
    19. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & José Eduardo R. Favaretto & Alberto Luiz Albertin & Fernando de Souza Meirelles, 2018. "The Influences of Strategic Information Systems on the Relationship between Innovation and Organizational Performance," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(5), pages 444-459, September.
    20. Omar A. El Sawy & Arvind Malhotra & YoungKi Park & Paul A. Pavlou, 2010. "Research Commentary ---Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 835-848, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:4:p:1240-:d:320881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.