IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarbs/v4y2014i12p199-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Evaluation and Ranking the Branches of Bank using FAHP and TOPSIS Case study: Tose Asr Shomal Interest-free Loan Fund

Author

Listed:
  • Aliasghar Aliakbarzadeh
  • Akbar Alem Tabriz

Abstract

There is no denial of the fact that performance evaluation is a critical managerial attempt in any organization especially financial institutions such as banks. MCDM methods have been utilized as efficient and common tools in many fields such as finance and economy and attract significant attention from public and financial regulators. The numerous opinions and enormous criteria associated with bank performance evaluation confines the implication of any single objective model. Therefore, multi-criteria decision making approach has been applied for this purpose. Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution method) are implemented to accomplish more ideal level of performance evaluation and to reveal the ranking of branches and identify the ones taking leading positions in the market. This paper aims at rating the branches of Tose Asr Shomal Interest-free Loan Funds based on financial and non-financial performance criteria extracted from related literature and experts' viewpoints. The weights of criteria were gained by AHP using experts' opinions. Moreover, at non-financial level, a LIKERT questionnaire was used to gather customers' viewpoints. After getting the financial data of the year 2013-2014, the branches were rated using TOSIS. The results revealed that the financial criteria had higher importance than nonfinancial ones and by synthesizing financial and non-financial performance; Keshavarz branch attained the first rank among the 13 branches.

Suggested Citation

  • Aliasghar Aliakbarzadeh & Akbar Alem Tabriz, 2014. "Performance Evaluation and Ranking the Branches of Bank using FAHP and TOPSIS Case study: Tose Asr Shomal Interest-free Loan Fund," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(12), pages 199-217, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:12:p:199-217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Performance_Evaluation_and_Ranking_the_Branches_of_Bank_using_FAHP_and_TOPSIS1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Performance_Evaluation_and_Ranking_the_Branches_of_Bank_using_FAHP_and_TOPSIS1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Mohamed Badreldin, 2009. "Measuring the Performance of Islamic Banks by Adapting Conventional Ratios," Working Papers 16, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    2. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    3. Lau, Chong M. & Sholihin, Mahfud, 2005. "Financial and nonfinancial performance measures: How do they affect job satisfaction?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 389-413.
    4. E. Grigoroudis & E. Tsitsiridi & C. Zopounidis, 2013. "Linking customer satisfaction, employee appraisal, and business performance: an evaluation methodology in the banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 205(1), pages 5-27, May.
    5. Philip Gerrard & J. Barton Cunningham, 2005. "The service quality of e-banks: an exploratory study," International Journal of Financial Services Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 102-117.
    6. Christian Kalhoefer & Rania Salem, 2008. "Profitability Analysis in the Egyptian Banking Sector," Working Papers 7, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.
    7. Malcolm Abbott & Su Wu & Wei Wang, 2013. "The productivity and performance of Australia’s major banks since deregulation," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 37(1), pages 122-135, January.
    8. Tser‐yieth Chen & Chie‐Bein Chen & Sin‐Ying Peng, 2008. "Firm operation performance analysis using data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 57(7), pages 523-539, September.
    9. Manabendra N. Pal & Koushiki Choudhury, 2009. "Exploring The Dimensionality Of Service Quality: An Application Of Topsis In The Indian Banking Industry," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(01), pages 115-133.
    10. Fernando A. F. Ferreira & Sérgio P. Santos & Paulo M. M. Rodrigues & Ronald W. Spahr, 2014. "Evaluating retail banking service quality and convenience with MCDA techniques: a case study at the bank branch level," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, February.
    11. Chang, Da-Yong, 1996. "Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 649-655, December.
    12. K. Kosmidou & F. Pasiouras & M. Doumpos & C. Zopounidis, 2006. "Assessing performance factors in the UK banking sector: A multicriteria methodology," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 14(1), pages 25-44, February.
    13. Paulo M.M. Rodrigues & Fernando A. F. Ferreira, 2011. "Evaluating retail banking quality service and convenience with MCDA techniques: a case study at the bank branch level," Working Papers w201131, Banco de Portugal, Economics and Research Department.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayfer Basar & Özgür Kabak & Y. Ilker Topcu, 2017. "A Decision Support Methodology for Locating Bank Branches: A Case Study in Turkey," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 59-86, January.
    2. Fengsheng Chien & Chia-Nan Wang & Ka Yin Chau & Van Thanh Nguyen & Viet Tinh Nguyen, 2021. "Sustainability in the Business Sector: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Model for Financial Leasing Company Selection of the Vietnamese SMEs," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emrah Önder & Ali Hepşen, 2013. "Combining Time Series Analysis and Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques for Forecasting Financial Performance of Banks in Turkey," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 3(3), pages 530-530.
    2. Dinh Xuan Cuong & Hoang Thi Hien & Tran Long, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Evaluating the Performance of Vietnamese Commercial Banks," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(1), pages 132-141, January.
    3. Sajid Ali & Sang-Moon Lee & Choon-Man Jang, 2017. "Determination of the Most Optimal On-Shore Wind Farm Site Location Using a GIS-MCDM Methodology: Evaluating the Case of South Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Aleksandar Aleksić & Danijela Tadić, 2023. "Industrial and Management Applications of Type-2 Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Techniques Extended with Type-2 Fuzzy Sets from 2013 to 2022," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Olcer, A. I. & Odabasi, A. Y., 2005. "A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 93-114, October.
    6. Mohamed Hanine & Omar Boutkhoum & Abderrafie El Maknissi & Abdessadek Tikniouine & Tarik Agouti, 2016. "Decision making under uncertainty using PEES–fuzzy AHP–fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for landfill location selection," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 351-367, December.
    7. Rakesh Raut & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou & Manoj Kharat, 2017. "Sustainability in The Banking Industry: A Strategic Multi‐Criterion Analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 550-568, May.
    8. Khalid Aljohani & Russell G. Thompson, 2018. "A Stakeholder-Based Evaluation of the Most Suitable and Sustainable Delivery Fleet for Freight Consolidation Policies in the Inner-City Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-27, December.
    9. Yu-Jie Wang, 2023. "Extending Quality Function Deployment and Analytic Hierarchy Process under Interval-Valued Fuzzy Environment for Evaluating Port Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Kiracı, Kasım & Akan, Ercan, 2020. "Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Panagiotis Mitropoulos & Ioannis Mitropoulos, 2020. "Performance evaluation of retail banking services: Is there a trade‐off between production and quality?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1237-1250, October.
    12. Shubham Gupta & Raghav Khanna & Pranay Kohli & Sarthak Agnihotri & Umang Soni & M. Asjad, 2023. "Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure using Fuzzy AHP – a case study in India," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 245-258, March.
    13. Ehsan Khanmohammadi & Maryam Azizi & HamidReza Talaie & Fatih Ecer & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2024. "A novel hybrid decision-making framework based on modified fuzzy analytic network process and fuzzy best–worst method," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-32, December.
    14. Keon Chul Park & Dong-Hee Shin, 2017. "Security assessment framework for IoT service," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 193-209, January.
    15. Somsuk, Nisakorn & Laosirihongthong, Tritos, 2014. "A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: Resource-based view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 198-210.
    16. Rezaei, Jafar & Ortt, Roland, 2013. "Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 75-84.
    17. Engin ÇAKIR, 2017. "Application of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods on Six Sigma Projects Selection," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, KSP Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 132-138, March.
    18. Tolga, Ethem & Demircan, Murat Levent & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2005. "Operating system selection using fuzzy replacement analysis and analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 89-117, July.
    19. Mandic, Ksenija & Delibasic, Boris & Knezevic, Snezana & Benkovic, Sladjana, 2014. "Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 30-37.
    20. Zhü, Kèyù, 2014. "Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Fallacy of the popular methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 209-217.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:12:p:199-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.