IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarbs/v4y2014i10p288-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors that Affect the Quality of Inputs in Manufacturing Organisations: A Case Study of Nampak Kenya Limited

Author

Listed:
  • Maina G.
  • H.M.Bwisa

Abstract

Supplier selection, Supply base reduction and supplier development among other factors plays a vital role in ensuring that manufacturing organizations get an acceptable quality of inputs from their suppliers. The purpose of this study is to carry out a research on how the above factors affect the quality of inputs in manufacturing organizations in Kenya. Studies carried out by previous researchers showed that manufacturing organizations lose a lot of money and time patching up issue brought about by poor quality of inputs which leads to scrap, rework and repair, trouble shooting, concessions, and downgrading and even losing future job opportunities. The research was carried out in Nampak Kenya Limited which is a food packaging company with both local and international suppliers of its raw materials. A questionnaire, interview guide and observation guide were all used to collect the data. A response rate of 92% was obtained. Based on the research findings 89% of the respondents indicated that supplier selection criterion affected the quality of input in manufacturing organizations.83.9% held it that supply base reduction greatly affects the quality of inputs and 61% said that supplier development greatly affects the quality of inputs in manufacturing organizations. The study concluded that manufacturing organizations in Kenya need to improve on their supplier selection criterion, reduce their supply base and also need to develop their suppliers rather than getting new ones all the time.

Suggested Citation

  • Maina G. & H.M.Bwisa, 2014. "Factors that Affect the Quality of Inputs in Manufacturing Organisations: A Case Study of Nampak Kenya Limited," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 4(10), pages 288-313, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:10:p:288-313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Factors_That_Affect_The_Quality_Of_Inputs_In_Manufacturing_Organisations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Factors_That_Affect_The_Quality_Of_Inputs_In_Manufacturing_Organisations.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, Stephan M., 2006. "A firm's responses to deficient suppliers and competitive advantage," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 686-695, June.
    2. Liu, Fuh-Hwa Franklin & Hai, Hui Lin, 2005. "The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 308-317, September.
    3. L. Zhang & X. You & J. Jiao & P. Helo, 2009. "Supply chain configuration with coordinated product, process and logistics decision: An approach based on Petri nets," Post-Print hal-00798997, HAL.
    4. Hughes, Mathew & Perrons, Robert K., 2011. "Shaping and re-shaping social capital in buyer-supplier relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 164-171, February.
    5. Harald Van Heerde & Kristiaan Helsen & Marnik G. Dekimpe, 2007. "The Impact of a Product-Harm Crisis on Marketing Effectiveness," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 230-245, 03-04.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    2. Linlin Zheng & Yashi Dong & Jineng Chen & Yuyi Li & Wenzhuo Li & Miaolian Su, 2022. "Impact of Crisis on Sustainable Business Model Innovation—The Role of Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-28, September.
    3. Mukherjee, Arka & Chauhan, Satyaveer S., 2021. "The impact of product recall on advertising decisions and firm profit while envisioning crisis or being hazard myopic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(3), pages 953-970.
    4. Hanssens, Dominique M. & Wang, Fang & Zhang, Xiao-Ping, 2016. "Performance growth and opportunistic marketing spending," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 711-724.
    5. Yu, Heyao & Legendre, Tiffany S. & Ma, Jing, 2021. "We stand by our brand: Consumers’ post-food safety crisis purchase intention and moral reasoning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 79-87.
    6. Tischer, Sven, 2012. "Measuring the impact of critical incidents on brand personality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2012-064, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
    7. Qi Sun & Fang Wu & Shanjun Li & Rajdeep Grewal, 2021. "Consumer Boycotts, Country of Origin, and Product Competition: Evidence from China’s Automobile Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5857-5877, September.
    8. Pauwels, Koen H., 2018. "Modeling Dynamic Relations Among Marketing and Performance Metrics," Foundations and Trends(R) in Marketing, now publishers, vol. 11(4), pages 215-301, November.
    9. Dang, Jingqi & Xu, Wei, 2018. "The Impact of Product-Harm Crisis on International Trade:Evidence from the 2008 Dairy Scandal in China," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273915, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Hsu, C.-H. & Wang, Fu-Kwun & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2012. "The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 95-111.
    11. Ivan A. Guitart & Guillaume Hervet & Sarah Gelper, 2020. "Competitive advertising strategies for programmatic television," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 753-775, July.
    12. Ataman, B.M., 2007. "Managing brands," Other publications TiSEM 462dcbba-2ac1-46d1-a61c-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Sven Tischer, 2012. "Measuring the impact of critical incidents on brand personality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2012-064, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    14. Olivier Rubel & Prasad A. Naik & Shuba Srinivasan, 2011. "Optimal Advertising When Envisioning a Product-Harm Crisis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(6), pages 1048-1065, November.
    15. Juan Carlos Pérez-Mesa & Mª Carmen García Barranco & Mª Mar Serrano Arcos & Raquel Sánchez Fernández, 2023. "Agri-food crises and news framing of media: an application to the Spanish greenhouse sector," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Stefan Jovčić & Petr Průša, 2021. "A Hybrid MCDM Approach in Third-Party Logistics (3PL) Provider Selection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Mukherjee, Arka & Carvalho, Margarida & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Managing quality and pricing during a product recall: An analysis of pre-crisis, crisis and post-crisis regimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(1), pages 406-420.
    18. Jafarzadeh Ghazi, Amirhossein & Karray, Salma & Azad, Nader, 2023. "Price and quality competition while envisioning a quality-related product recall," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 486-501.
    19. Bottani, Eleonora & Rizzi, Antonio, 2008. "An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection--An application oriented to lead-time reduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 763-781, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:4:y:2014:i:10:p:288-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.