IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/9102824.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Novel Complexity Indicator of Manufacturing Process Chains and Its Relations to Indirect Complexity Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Vladimir Modrak
  • Zuzana Soltysova

Abstract

Manufacturing systems can be considered as a network of machines/workstations, where parts are produced in flow shop or job shop environment, respectively. Such network of machines/workstations can be depicted as a graph, with machines as nodes and material flow between the nodes as links. The aim of this paper is to use sequences of operations and machine network to measure static complexity of manufacturing processes. In this order existing approaches to measure the static complexity of manufacturing systems are analyzed and subsequently compared. For this purpose, analyzed competitive complexity indicators were tested on two different manufacturing layout examples. A subsequent analysis showed relevant potential of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladimir Modrak & Zuzana Soltysova, 2017. "Novel Complexity Indicator of Manufacturing Process Chains and Its Relations to Indirect Complexity Indicators," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:9102824
    DOI: 10.1155/2017/9102824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2017/9102824.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2017/9102824.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2017/9102824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blecker, Thorsten & Abdelkafi, Nizar & Kaluza, Bernd & Kreutler, Gerold, 2004. "Mass Customization vs. Complexity: A Gordian Knot?," MPRA Paper 5290, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Philip Anderson, 1999. "Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 216-232, June.
    3. Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Meyer, Christian, 2005. "Development of an Approach for Analyzing Supply Chain Complexity," MPRA Paper 5284, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. William W. Cooper & Kingshuk K. Sinha & Robert S. Sullivan, 1992. "Measuring Complexity in High-Technology Manufacturing: Indexes for Evaluation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 38-48, August.
    5. Hau L. Lee & Corey Billington, 1995. "The Evolution of Supply-Chain-Management Models and Practice at Hewlett-Packard," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 42-63, October.
    6. Suresh Kotha & Daniel Orne, 1989. "Generic manufacturing strategies: A conceptual synthesis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(3), pages 211-231, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salvatore Cannella & Roberto Dominguez & Jose M. Framinan & Borja Ponte, 2018. "Evolving Trends in Supply Chain Management: Complexity, New Technologies, and Innovative Methodological Approaches," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-3, June.
    2. Gerardo Beruvides & Fernando Castaño & Rodolfo E. Haber & Ramón Quiza & Alberto Villalonga, 2017. "Coping with Complexity When Predicting Surface Roughness in Milling Processes: Hybrid Incremental Model with Optimal Parametrization," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-11, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caridi, Maria & Crippa, Luca & Perego, Alessandro & Sianesi, Andrea & Tumino, Angela, 2010. "Do virtuality and complexity affect supply chain visibility?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 372-383, October.
    2. Zhenying Zhao & Michael Ball & Masahiro Kotake, 2005. "Optimization-Based Available-To-Promise with Multi-Stage Resource Availability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 65-85, March.
    3. Ly, Kim Cuong & Liu, Hong & Opong, Kwaku, 2017. "Who acquires whom among stand-alone commercial banks and bank holding company affiliates?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 144-158.
    4. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Jacob, Jojo & Belderbos, René & Lokshin, Boris, 2023. "Entangled modes: Boundaries to effective international knowledge sourcing through technology alliances and technology-based acquisitions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Salar Hussain & Arjumand Bano Soomro & Arifa Bhutto & Sobia Shah & Shazia Shahab Shaikh, 2019. "Impacting Factors on the Employees’ Performance during Acquisitions: A Study on KASB Bank into Bank Islami Pakistan Ltd," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(4), pages 123-129, April.
    7. Ellinas, Christos & Allan, Neil & Johansson, Anders, 2016. "Project systemic risk: Application examples of a network model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 50-62.
    8. Heim, Gregory R. & Sinha, Kingshuk K., 1999. "Design And Delivery Of Electronic Services: Implications For Customer Value In Electronic Food Retailing," Working Papers 14341, University of Minnesota, The Food Industry Center.
    9. Charles L. Munson & Jianli Hu & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 2003. "Teaching the Costs of Uncoordinated Supply Chains," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 24-39, June.
    10. Reid, Gavin C. & Smith, Julia A., 2009. "A coevolutionary analysis of organisational systems and processes: Quantitative applications to information system dynamics in small entrepreneurial firms," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 762-781.
    11. Glover, Fred & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Johnson, Mark & Mena, Carlos, 2008. "Supply chain management for servitised products: A multi-industry case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 27-39, July.
    13. Mark Nissen, 2000. "Agent‐based supply chain disintermediation versus re‐intermediation: economic and technological perspectives," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 237-256, December.
    14. Mustapha Ouhimmou & Sophie D'Amours & Robert Beauregard & Daoud Ait-Kadi & Satyaveer Singh Chauhan, 2009. "Optimization Helps Shermag Gain Competitive Edge," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 329-345, August.
    15. Kingshuk K. Sinha & Andrew H. Van de Ven, 2005. "Designing Work Within and Between Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 389-408, August.
    16. Vogel, Wolfgang & Lasch, Rainer, 2015. "Approach for Complexity Management in Variant-rich Product Development," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 97-140, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    17. Fitzgerald, Guy & Barad, Miryam & Papazafeiropoulou, Anastasia & Alaa, Ghada, 2009. "A framework for analyzing flexibility of generic objects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 329-339, November.
    18. Carlos León, 2020. "Banks in Colombia: How Homogeneous Are They?," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, vol. 23(2), pages 1-32, December.
    19. Haarhaus, Tim & Liening, Andreas, 2020. "Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Arianna Dal Forno & Ugo Merlone, 2021. "Envy effects on conflict dynamics in supervised work groups," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 44(2), pages 755-779, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:9102824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.