IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/7562903.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Use of Different Platforms Influence the Relationship between Cocreation Value-in-Use and Participants’ Cocreation Behaviors? An Application in Third-Party Managed Virtual Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Rubio
  • Nieves Villaseñor
  • Maria Jesús Yague

Abstract

Despite an increasing amount of research on cocreation value, research on participants’ value-in-use in third-party managed virtual communities remains limited. This study explores how participants perceive value-in-use through their participation in third-party managed virtual communities and the influence of the participants’ value-in-use on three cocreation behaviors typical of these communities: information searching, feedback, and coinnovation activities. Participant value-in-use is a multidimensional construct consisting of five dimensions: informational value, entertainment value, social integrative value, personal integrative value, and community interactivity. We also consider whether use of different platforms (website, mobile app, or both) exerts a moderating effect on this cocreation process and identify significant differences in the relationships proposed based on the platform the participants use to access the virtual community. The research is contrasted empirically using the virtual community TripAdvisor. The PLS-SEM method is used to test the model proposed. In comparing the website and mobile app models, the results show significantly stronger effects on the relationships in the route “informational value-participants’ value-in-use-information searching” for the website. Also, we find a stronger route for personal integrative value-participants’ value-in-use-feedback among users of the mobile app than for website users. In the case of participants who use only one platform (website or mobile app) rather than both (website and mobile app), the weight of use of one technology rather than both is significantly greater in coinnovation. This study enriches previous studies that advance theories of cocreation value and provides companies with practical guidance to identify and encourage cocreation behaviors and enhance the perceived value-in-use of virtual community participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Rubio & Nieves Villaseñor & Maria Jesús Yague, 2019. "Does Use of Different Platforms Influence the Relationship between Cocreation Value-in-Use and Participants’ Cocreation Behaviors? An Application in Third-Party Managed Virtual Communities," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:7562903
    DOI: 10.1155/2019/7562903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2019/7562903.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2019/7562903.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2019/7562903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merz, Michael A. & Zarantonello, Lia & Grappi, Silvia, 2018. "How valuable are your customers in the brand value co-creation process? The development of a Customer Co-Creation Value (CCCV) scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 79-89.
    2. Eric Vernette & Linda Hamdi-Kidar, 2013. "Co-creation with consumers : who has the competence and wants to cooperate," Post-Print halshs-00862377, HAL.
    3. Casaló, Luis V. & Flavián, Carlos & Guinalíu, Miguel, 2010. "Determinants of the intention to participate in firm-hosted online travel communities and effects on consumer behavioral intentions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 898-911.
    4. Molinillo, Sebastian & Liébana-Cabanillas, Francisco & Anaya-Sánchez, Rafael & Buhalis, Dimitrios, 2018. "DMO online platforms: Image and intention to visit," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 116-130.
    5. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    6. Kumar Rakesh Ranjan & Stuart Read, 2016. "Value co-creation: concept and measurement," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 290-315, May.
    7. John Dimmick, 1997. "The Theory of the Niche and Spending on Mass media: The Case of the "Video Revolution"," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 33-43.
    8. John Dimmick & Yan Chen & Zhan Li, 2004. "Competition Between the Internet and Traditional News Media: The Gratification-Opportunities Niche Dimension," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 19-33.
    9. Yi, Youjae & Gong, Taeshik, 2013. "Customer value co-creation behavior: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1279-1284.
    10. Brodie, Roderick J. & Ilic, Ana & Juric, Biljana & Hollebeek, Linda, 2013. "Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 105-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kuen-Cheng Lee & I-Hsiung Chang & Tsung-Jen Wu & Ru-Si Chen, 2022. "The Moderating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Relationship Between Online Customer Experience and Behavioral Intentions to Use Parenting Apps for Taiwanese Preschool Parents," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natalia Rubio & Nieves Villaseñor & Mª Jesús Yagüe, 2021. "Influence of Value Co-Creation on Virtual Community Brand Equity for Unichannel vs. Multichannel Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Linda D. Hollebeek & Moira K. Clark & Wafa Hammedi & René Arvola, 2021. "Cocreated brand value: theoretical model and propositions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 413-428, July.
    3. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia & Romero, Jaime & Bilro, Ricardo Godinho, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 388-409.
    4. Chapman, Alexis & Dilmperi, Athina, 2022. "Luxury brand value co-creation with online brand communities in the service encounter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 902-921.
    5. Wang, Qingtao & Bai, Xuan & Li, Julie Juan, 2023. "Achieving value co-creation through cooperation in international joint ventures: A two-level perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1).
    6. Natalia Rubio & Nieves Villaseñor & MªJesús Yagüe, 2020. "Sustainable Co-Creation Behavior in a Virtual Community: Antecedents and Moderating Effect of Participant’s Perception of Own Expertise," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, October.
    7. Busser, James A. & Shulga, Lenna V., 2018. "Co-created value: Multidimensional scale and nomological network," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 69-86.
    8. Jessica Bosisio, 2024. "A research landscape on customer co-creation value: a systematic literature network analysis," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2024(3), pages 339-368, September.
    9. Matti Haverila & Kai Haverila & Caitlin McLaughlin & Mehak Arora, 2022. "Engagement, participation, and relationship quality in the context of co-creation in brand communities," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(3), pages 232-249, September.
    10. Yi-Wen Chen, 2020. "Sustainable Value Co-Creation in the Virtual Community: How Diversified Co-Creation Experience Affects Co-Creation Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Cassandra France & Debra Grace & Joseph Lo Iacono & Joan Carlini, 0. "Exploring the interplay between customer perceived brand value and customer brand co-creation behaviour dimensions," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    12. Nathalie Peña-García & Mauricio Losada-Otálora & Jorge Juliao-Rossi & Augusto Rodríguez-Orejuela, 2021. "Co-Creation of Value and Customer Experience: An Application in Online Banking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Christian Narh Opata & Wen Xiao & Angela Abena Nusenu & Stephen Tetteh & Tettey-Wayo John Narh, 2020. "Customer Value Co-Creation in the Automobile Industry: Antecedents, Satisfaction, and Moderation," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, August.
    14. Felicitas Evangelista & Maria Estela Varua & Vivienne Saverimuttu & Rina Datt & Hugh Pattinson & Karina Wardle & Anna Evangelista, 2022. "Antecedents and Outcomes of Service Co-Creation in the Sharing Economy," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    15. Mandl, Leonhard & Hogreve, Jens, 2020. "Buffering effects of brand community identification in service failures: The role of customer citizenship behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 130-137.
    16. Benedict G. C. Dellaert, 2019. "The consumer production journey: marketing to consumers as co-producers in the sharing economy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 238-254, March.
    17. Haoyu Liu & Kim Hua Tan & Xianfeng Wu, 2023. "Who’s watching? Classifying sports viewers on social live streaming services," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 743-765, June.
    18. Weijia Kong & Yunfei Shao & Simeng Wang & Wei Yan & Yawen Liu, 2024. "The Implications of the Spillover Effect Related to Green Co-Creation in a Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, April.
    19. Zhang, Xingyi & Singh, Smita & Li, Jing & Shao, Xiaolong, 2024. "Exploring the effects of value co-creation strategies in event services on attendees’ citizenship behaviors: The roles of customer empowerment and psychological ownership," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    20. Katsifaraki, Georgia D. & Theodosiou, Marios, 2020. "How different (dis)engagement behaviors affect performance within an e-market ecosystem: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 578-591.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:7562903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.