IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hig/fsight/v14y2020i2p76-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why are Some Recommendation Systems Preferred?

Author

Listed:
  • Gaofeng Yi

    (Supratman University of Surabaya (Indonesia))

Abstract

There has been wide interest in exploring ways to provide more efficient personalized recommendation systems (RSs) in order to attract customers and increase product sales. The majority of the existing researches are concerned with improving the accuracy and effectiveness of the recommendation algorithms, or focusing on how to limit perceived risks, with the aim of increasing consumer satisfaction. Unlike these mentioned studies, this research begins from the perspective of customer-RS interaction, and ends in revealing the mechanisms involved in consumers’ acceptance of recommendations by using the technology acceptance model. The empirical study results show that perceived interpersonal interaction is an important factor that directly affects university students’ intentions to use RS, while perceived ease- of- use influences them in an indirect way through mediation of perceived usefulness. On this basis, the study thus provides suggestions on how to supply an improved interaction with easy and useful personalized RS.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaofeng Yi, 2020. "Why are Some Recommendation Systems Preferred?," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 76-86.
    • Handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:76-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2020/06/12/1605934681/6-Yi-76-86.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlson, Jamie & O’Cass, Aron & Ahrholdt, Dennis, 2015. "Assessing customers’ perceived value of the online channel of multichannel retailers: A two country examination," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 90-102.
    2. Virginia Fernández-Pérez & Ana Montes-Merino & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza & Patricia Esther Alonso Galicia, 2019. "Emotional competencies and cognitive antecedents in shaping student’s entrepreneurial intention: the moderating role of entrepreneurship education," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 281-305, March.
    3. Rex E. Pereira, 2001. "Influence of Query-Based Decision Aids on Consumer Decision Making in Electronic Commerce," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 31-48, January.
    4. Yi He & Qimei Chen & Sakawrat Kitkuakul, 2018. "Regulatory focus and technology acceptance: Perceived ease of use and usefulness as efficacy," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1459006-145, January.
    5. Kolar, Tomaz & Zabkar, Vesna, 2010. "A consumer-based model of authenticity: An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing?," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 652-664.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhattacharya Ananya & Dutta Madhura & Waelde Charlotte, 2021. "Designing Heritage-Sensitive IP and Marketing Strategies for ICH-Based Creative Economy," Culture. Society. Economy. Politics, Sciendo, vol. 1(2), pages 72-87, December.
    2. Rickly, Jillian M., 2022. "A review of authenticity research in tourism: Launching the Annals of Tourism Research Curated Collection on authenticity," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Raghavendra Prasanna Kumar & Arindam Banerjee & Zahran Al-Salti & S. Ananda, 2024. "Technology acceptance model and customer engagement: mediating role of customer satisfaction," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1062-1076, September.
    4. Xitong Li & Jörn Grahl & Oliver Hinz, 2022. "How Do Recommender Systems Lead to Consumer Purchases? A Causal Mediation Analysis of a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 620-637, June.
    5. Feng Xu & Wenxia Niu & Shuaishuai Li & Yuli Bai, 2020. "The Mechanism of Word-of-Mouth for Tourist Destinations in Crisis," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    6. Jean-Fabrice Lebraty & Katia Lobre, 2010. "Créer de la valeur par le crowdsourcing : la dyade Innovation-Authenticité," Post-Print halshs-00545780, HAL.
    7. Feng Xu & Xuejiao Lin & Shuaishuai Li & Wenxia Niu, 2018. "Is Southern Xinjiang Really Unsafe?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Szmigin, Isabelle & Bengry-Howell, Andrew & Morey, Yvette & Griffin, Christine & Riley, Sarah, 2017. "Socio-spatial authenticity at co-created music festivals," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-11.
    9. Xi Li & Huawen Shen & Huijun Wen, 2016. "A Study on Tourists Perceived Authenticity towards Experience Quality and Behavior Intention of Cultural Heritage in Macao," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(4), pages 117-123, August.
    10. Wu, Daoyou & Guo, Kun & He, Qiuyan & Zhang, Ju, 2023. "The impact of live streamers' improvisational responses to unexpected events on their entrepreneurial performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Lizette Huezo-Ponce & Virginia Fernández-Pérez & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza, 2021. "Emotional competencies and entrepreneurship: modeling universities," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 1497-1519, September.
    12. Ram, Y. & Björk, P. & Weidenfeld, A., 2016. "Authenticity and place attachment of major visitor attractions," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 110-122.
    13. Mortimer, Gary & Andrade, María Lucila Osorio & Fazal-e-Hasan, Syed Muhammad, 2024. "From traditional to transformed: Examining the pre- and post-COVID consumers’ shopping mall experiences," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    14. Yongjun Su & Junjie Xu & Marios Sotiriadis & Shiwei Shen, 2021. "Authenticity, Perceived Value and Loyalty in Marine Tourism Destinations: The Case of Zhoushan, Zhejiang Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Tsao, Wen-Yu, 2013. "The fitness of product information: Evidence from online recommendations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-9.
    16. Mark Ng & Monica Law & Ka-fu Kevin Lin, 2024. "Determinants of smartphone brand switching intention of consumers in Hong Kong," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(2), pages 275-289, June.
    17. Armand Faganel, 2018. "Global Diversities in Safeguarding the Cultural Heritage," MIC 2018: Managing Global Diversities; Proceedings of the Joint International Conference, Bled, Slovenia, 30 May–2 June 2018,, University of Primorska Press.
    18. Mencarelli, Rémi & Rivière, Arnaud & Lombart, Cindy, 2021. "Do myriad e-channels always create value for customers? A dynamic analysis of the perceived value of a digital information product during the usage phase," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Petr, Christine, 2015. "How heritage site tourists may become monument visitors," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 247-262.
    20. Suleyman Ozarslan & P. Erhan Eren, 2018. "MobileCDP: A mobile framework for the consumer decision process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 803-824, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    online personalized recommendation system (RS); technology innovation; customer choice; customer-RS interaction; adoption intention;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hig:fsight:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:76-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nataliya Gavrilicheva or Mikhail Salazkin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hsecoru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.