IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jtourh/v5y2024i4p67-1216d1521305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geoinformation Internet Platform for Interactive Charity Tourism in the Current Realities of Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Valeriia Shcherbak

    (Department of Economic and Entrepreneurship, Sumy National Agrarian University, 40000 Sumy, Ukraine)

  • Liudmyla Dorokhova

    (Department of Marketing, University of Tartu, 50090 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Viktoriia Riashchenko

    (Business Administration, ISMA University of Applied Sciences, LV-1019 Riga, Latvia)

  • Oleksandr Dorokhov

    (Department of Public Economics, University of Tartu, 50090 Tartu, Estonia)

  • Valentina Djakona

    (Vice-Rector for Studies, ISMA University of Applied Sciences, LV-1019 Riga, Latvia)

  • Oleksii Yermolenko

    (Department of Social Economics, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics, 61166 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

In the context of armed conflicts, regions often face infrastructure destruction and economic difficulties. The development of tourism can be a key factor in recovery and economic growth. Geospatial platforms for interactive charitable tourism offer a promising solution for attracting tourists and stimulating the development of affected regions. The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of geospatial platforms for interactive charitable tourism as a tool for attracting tourists and promoting the recovery and development of regions affected by armed conflicts. This study employed regression and correlation analysis methods. The analysis revealed significant positive correlations for all variables. The correlation coefficient for audience reach was 0.75, for the effectiveness of attracting donations—0.8, for the economic impact on the region—0.9, for user interaction with the platform—0.85, for platform sustainability—0.78, and for social impact—0.92. The t-statistic values exceeded the critical thresholds, and the p-values were below 0.05, confirming the statistical significance of the results. The coefficient of determination was 0.91, indicating a high explanatory power of the model. For the four obtained clusters, approaches to the development and use of geospatial platforms were justified. For regions of Cluster 1 with high audience reach (0.75) and moderate effectiveness of attracting donations (0.8), it is recommended to use technologies to improve connectivity and effectively promote their strengths. For regions of Cluster 2 with high sustainability and high tourism potential (high social impact = 0.92), it is necessary to include advanced geospatial solutions to increase visitor engagement and optimize recovery strategies, building on existing strengths to attract more tourists and stimulate sustainable development. For regions of Cluster 3, significant investments are required both in geospatial platforms and in tourism infrastructure to benefit from high tourism potential (economic impact on the region = 0.9). Strategic development and targeted marketing should be a priority to attract tourists and stimulate economic growth. Regions of Cluster 4 with low sustainability and tourism potential (low user interaction with the platform = 0.85 and platform sustainability = 0.78) require comprehensive support, as they are in a crisis situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeriia Shcherbak & Liudmyla Dorokhova & Viktoriia Riashchenko & Oleksandr Dorokhov & Valentina Djakona & Oleksii Yermolenko, 2024. "Geoinformation Internet Platform for Interactive Charity Tourism in the Current Realities of Ukraine," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:67-1216:d:1521305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/5/4/67/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/5/4/67/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Waligo, Victoria M. & Clarke, Jackie & Hawkins, Rebecca, 2013. "Implementing sustainable tourism: A multi-stakeholder involvement management framework," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 342-353.
    2. Stocker, Volker & Smaragdakis, Georgios & Lehr, William & Bauer, Steven, 2017. "The growing complexity of content delivery networks: Challenges and implications for the Internet ecosystem," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1003-1016.
    3. Lo, Ada S. & Lee, Candy Y.S., 2011. "Motivations and perceived value of volunteer tourists from Hong Kong," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 326-334.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farmaki, Anna & Altinay, Levent & Botterill, David & Hilke, Sarina, 2015. "Politics and sustainable tourism: The case of Cyprus," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 178-190.
    2. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Stocker, Volker & Stockhammer, Paul, 2019. "Ist Netzneutralität tatsächlich gut? Eine Neubewertung vor dem Hintergrund der Regulierung in den USA und in der EU sowie aktueller Forschungsergebnisse," Policy Notes 38, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Carayannis, Elias G. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Bento, Paulo & Ferreira, João J.M. & Jalali, Marjan S. & Fernandes, Bernardo M.Q., 2018. "Developing a socio-technical evaluation index for tourist destination competitiveness using cognitive mapping and MCDA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 147-158.
    4. Anne Hardy & Leonie J. Pearson, 2016. "Determining Sustainable Tourism in Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Iva Slivar & Tea Golja, 2015. "Boosting Corporate Social Responsibility in Tourist Destinations through Loyalty Programs and Stakeholder Collaboration," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(4), pages 122-133.
    6. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Stocker, Volker & Whalley, Jason, 2018. "Public Policy Targets in EU Broadband Markets: The Role of Technological Neutrality," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184936, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Shih-Hao Wang & Meng-Tsung Lee & Pierre-Alexandre Château & Yang-Chi Chang, 2016. "Performance Indicator Framework for Evaluation of Sustainable Tourism in the Taiwan Coastal Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Stocker, Volker, 2020. "Bedeutung digitaler Infrastrukturen und Dienste und Maßnahmen zur Förderung der Resilienz in Krisenzeiten," Policy Notes 42, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Chen Zhao & Huawen Shen, 2024. "The Moderating Effect of Ski Influencer on Ski Tourism Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    10. Vogelsang Ingo, 2018. "Net Neutrality Regulation: Much Ado about Nothing?," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 225-243, September.
    11. Sheresheva, Marina Y. & Polukhina, Anna N. & Oborin, Matvey S., 2020. "Marketing issues of sustainable tourism development in Russian regions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 33-38.
    12. Rose Ann A. Villarias & Kristin Iris G. Estores, 2021. "Resort Management Practices and Tourism Impacts of an Island Resort in Negros Occidental," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 823-845, September.
    13. Adina Letiţia Negruşa & Valentin Toader & Aurelian Sofică & Mihaela Filofteia Tutunea & Rozalia Veronica Rus, 2015. "Exploring Gamification Techniques and Applications for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-30, August.
    14. Günter Knieps, 2017. "Internet of Things, future networks, and the economics of virtual networks," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 18(3-4), pages 240-255, September.
    15. Carlo Amendola & Simone La Bella & Gian Piero Joime & Fabio Massimo Frattale Mascioli & Pietro Vito, 2022. "An Integrated Methodology Model for Smart Mobility System Applied to Sustainable Tourism," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, March.
    16. Sifeng Nian & Jie Zhang & Honglei Zhang & Jinhe Zhang & Donghe Li & Ke Wu & Xue Chen & Lingling Yang, 2019. "Two Sides of a Coin: A Crisis Response Perspective on Tourist Community Participation in a Post-Disaster Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Zhou, Long & Li, Yixin & Cheng, Jialin & Qin, Yu & Shen, Guoqiang & Li, Bin & Yang, Huajie & Li, Sihong, 2023. "Understanding the aesthetic perceptions and image impressions experienced by tourists walking along tourism trails through continuous cityscapes in Macau," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Pilar Tirado-Valencia & Soyeun Lee, 2020. "Volunteering Attitude, Mental Well-Being, and Loyalty for the Non-Profit Religious Organization of Volunteer Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Oughton, Edward J. & Lehr, William & Katsaros, Konstantinos & Selinis, Ioannis & Bubley, Dean & Kusuma, Julius, 2021. "Revisiting Wireless Internet Connectivity: 5G vs Wi-Fi 6," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5).
    20. Juan Ignacio Pulido-Fernández & Yaiza López-Sánchez, 2016. "Are Tourists Really Willing to Pay More for Sustainable Destinations?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:5:y:2024:i:4:p:67-1216:d:1521305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.