IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jtourh/v5y2024i2p28-471d1406467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Reliance in Community-Based Rural Tourism: Observing Tourism Villages ( Desa Wisata ) in Sleman Regency, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Yoan A. W. Sutomo

    (Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies (GSGES), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
    Regional Government of Sleman Regency, Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY), Yogyakarta 55511, Indonesia)

  • Corinthias P. M. Sianipar

    (Department of Global Ecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
    Division of Environmental Science and Technology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    Center for Socio-Ecological Systems and Modeling, SystemsACT Institute, Bandung 40154, Indonesia)

  • Satoshi Hoshino

    (Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies (GSGES), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
    Graduate School of Agriculture (GSA), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan)

  • Kenichiro Onitsuka

    (Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies (GSGES), Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

Abstract

Self-reliance is essential for community-based rural tourism (CBRT), ensuring effective running in the long term. However, existing studies have focused on general self-reliance conditions while overlooking details surrounding the community’s self-reliance in each activity of the CBRT value chain. This study filled this significant gap by observing community self-reliance in CBRT and considering the tourism value chain (TVC) framework. Built upon the abduction method, this study applied the systematic combining approach to observe three aspects of self-reliance, i.e., goals or objectives, rights and abilities, and owned resources, in the TVC of CBRT entities. Taking the case of CBRT in Sleman Regency, Indonesia, the data collection involved representatives of 49 community-based tourism villages ( desa wisata ). The results showed that observing community self-reliance in CBRT allows for the identification of multifaceted self-reliance problems in rural tourism communities. Apparently, the observed CBRT initiatives are unable to achieve complete self-sufficiency across all aspects of self-reliance. Reliance on external collaboration and support networks persists out of necessity rather than an inability to self-manage. Policy protections, capacity building, and collaborative partnerships are necessary to develop resilient and sustainable rural tourism amidst necessary dependencies. CBRT planning and policies should hence consider the abovementioned aspects of self-reliance to empower CBRT toward sustainable rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoan A. W. Sutomo & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Satoshi Hoshino & Kenichiro Onitsuka, 2024. "Self-Reliance in Community-Based Rural Tourism: Observing Tourism Villages ( Desa Wisata ) in Sleman Regency, Indonesia," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:28-471:d:1406467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/5/2/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-5768/5/2/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yasuo Ohe, 2020. "Community-based Rural Tourism and Entrepreneurship," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-15-0383-2, February.
    2. Yildirim Yilmaz & Umit Bititci, 2006. "Performance measurement in the value chain: manufacturing v. tourism," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 371-389, July.
    3. Rita V. Krishnamurthi & Ekta Singh Dahiya & Reshmi Bala & Gary Cheung & Susan Yates & Sarah Cullum, 2022. "Lived Experience of Dementia in the New Zealand Indian Community: A Qualitative Study with Family Care Givers and People Living with Dementia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Bright Adiyia & Sarah De Rademaeker & Dominique Vanneste & Wilber Manyisa Ahebwa, 2017. "Understanding local entrepreneurship and small enterprises in the tourism–development nexus: The case of western Uganda," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 105-120, January.
    6. Yasuo Ohe, 2023. "Exploring New Opportunities for Agritourism in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-4, June.
    7. David W. Marcouiller, 1998. "Environmental Resources as Latent Primary Factors of Production in Tourism: The Case of Forest-Based Commercial Recreation," Tourism Economics, , vol. 4(2), pages 131-145, June.
    8. Dubois, Anna & Gadde, Lars-Erik, 2002. "Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 553-560, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pascal Dey & Chris Steyaert, 2016. "Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 627-641, February.
    2. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    3. Zhang, Hongjuan & Young, Michael N. & Tan, Justin & Sun, Weizheng, 2018. "How Chinese companies deal with a legitimacy imbalance when acquiring firms from developed economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(5), pages 752-767.
    4. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki, 2019. "Pathologies and Paradoxes of Co-Creation: A Contribution to the Discussion about Corporate Social Responsibility in Building a Competitive Advantage in the Age of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-38, September.
    5. Caroline Ardelet & Nathalie Veg-Sala & Alain Goudey & Marie Haikel-Elsabeh, 2017. "Between fear and desire for smart products: toward an understanding of consumers ambivalence [Entre crainte et désir pour les objets connectés : comprendre l'ambivalence des consommateurs]," Post-Print hal-01570286, HAL.
    6. Guiette, Alain & Vandenbempt, Koen, 2017. "Change managerialism and micro-processes of sensemaking during change implementation," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 65-81.
    7. Andrzej Janowski & Anna Szczepańska-Przekota, 2022. "The Trait of Extraversion as an Energy-Based Determinant of Entrepreneur’s Success—The Case of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Menzies, Jane & Chavan, Meena & Jack, Robert & Scarparo, Simona & Chirico, Francesco, 2024. "Australian indigenous female entrepreneurs: The role of adversity quotient," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    9. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    10. Suomi, Kati & Luonila, Mervi & Tähtinen, Jaana, 2020. "Ironic festival brand co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 211-220.
    11. Kirsti Iivonen, 2018. "Defensive Responses to Strategic Sustainability Paradoxes: Have Your Coke and Drink It Too!," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 309-327, March.
    12. Alaassar, Ahmad & Mention, Anne-Laure & Aas, Tor Helge, 2021. "Exploring a new incubation model for FinTechs: Regulatory sandboxes," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Baran Grzegorz, 2020. "Social Innovation Living Labs as Platforms to Co-design Social Innovations," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 36-57, March.
    14. Meyer, Camille, 2020. "The commons: A model for understanding collective action and entrepreneurship in communities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 35(5).
    15. Christina Öberg, 2016. "How Innovation Impacts Artistic Creativity — Managing Innovation In The Advertising Sector," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-23, May.
    16. Frans Prenkert, 2012. "Business Network Simulation: Combining Research Cases and Agent-Based Models in a Robust Methodology," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(6), pages 82-92, November.
    17. Gasparin, Isadora & Panina, Ekaterina & Becker, Larissa & Yrjölä, Mika & Jaakkola, Elina & Pizzutti, Cristiane, 2022. "Challenging the "integration imperative": A customer perspective on omnichannel journeys," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    18. Antonella La Rocca & Ivan Snehota, 2021. "Mobilizing suppliers when starting up a new business venture," Post-Print hal-03328945, HAL.
    19. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.
    20. Gian Luca Gregori & Silvia Cardinali & Meri Travaglini, 2013. "Imprese calzaturiere e competitivit? nel mercato mondiale: il caso di una media luxury brand company," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3), pages 151-168.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jtourh:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:28-471:d:1406467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.