IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i8p1337-d106497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crop Parameters for Modeling Sugarcane under Rainfed Conditions in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Alma Delia Baez-Gonzalez

    (Campo Experimental Pabellon, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), km 32.5 Carr, Aguascalientes-Zacatecas, Pabellon de Arteaga 20660, Aguascalientes, Mexico)

  • James R. Kiniry

    (USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland Soil and Water Research Laboratory, 808 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502, USA)

  • Manyowa N. Meki

    (AgriLife Research, Blackland Research and Extension Center, 720 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502, USA)

  • Jimmy Williams

    (AgriLife Research, Blackland Research and Extension Center, 720 E. Blackland Rd., Temple, TX 76502, USA)

  • Marcelino Alvarez-Cilva

    (Campo Experimental Tecoman, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias, km. 35, Carr, Colima-Manzanillo, Tecoman 28930, Colima, Mexico)

  • Jose L. Ramos-Gonzalez

    (Campo Experimental Pabellon, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), km 32.5 Carr, Aguascalientes-Zacatecas, Pabellon de Arteaga 20660, Aguascalientes, Mexico)

  • Agustin Magallanes-Estala

    (Campo Experimental Rio Bravo, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias, km 61 Carr, Matamoros-Reynosa, Rio Bravo 88900, Tamaulipas, Mexico)

  • Gonzalo Zapata-Buenfil

    (Campo Experimental Chetumal, INIFAP, km 25.2 Carr. Chetumal-Bacalar, Ejido Juan Sarabia, Municipio Othon P. Blanco 77900, Quintana Roo, Mexico)

Abstract

Crop models with well-tested parameters may help improve sugarcane productivity for food and biofuel generation, especially in rainfed areas where studies are scarce. This study aimed to calibrate crop parameters for the sugarcane cultivar CP 72-2086, an early-maturing cultivar widely grown in Mexico and other countries, and evaluate their adequacy in simulating sugarcane in a diverse range of rainfed conditions. For the calibration and evaluation of parameters, the ALMANAC model was used with climate, soil, management, and yield for two growing seasons from 30 farms in three regions (Northeastern Mexico, Gulf of Mexico, and Pacific Mexico). Statistical analyses were made using regression analysis and mean squared deviation and its three components, i.e., the squared bias, the lack of correlation weighted by the standard deviations, and the squared difference between standard deviations. Model simulations with a light extinction coefficient ( k ) of 0.69, maximum leaf area index of 7.5, leaf area index decline rate of 0.3, optimal and minimum temperature for plant growth of 32 °C and 11 °C, respectively, potential heat units of 6000 to 7400 degree days (base 11 °C), harvest index of 0.9; maximum crop height of 4.0 m, and root depth of 2.0 m showed highest accuracy and captured best the magnitude of yield fluctuations with a root mean squared deviation of 7.8 Mg ha −1 . The parameters were found to be reasonable to use in simulating sugarcane in diverse regions under rainfed conditions. Using a dynamic value of k (varying during the growing season) deserves further study as it may help improve crop model precision.

Suggested Citation

  • Alma Delia Baez-Gonzalez & James R. Kiniry & Manyowa N. Meki & Jimmy Williams & Marcelino Alvarez-Cilva & Jose L. Ramos-Gonzalez & Agustin Magallanes-Estala & Gonzalo Zapata-Buenfil, 2017. "Crop Parameters for Modeling Sugarcane under Rainfed Conditions in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1337-:d:106497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/8/1337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiniry, James R. & Williams, J. R. & Gassman, Philip W. & Debacke, P., 1992. "General, Process-Oriented Model for Two Competing Plant Species (A)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 483, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vishal Ram & Surender Reddy Salkuti, 2023. "An Overview of Major Synthetic Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-35, March.
    2. Aguilar-Rivera, Noé & Algara-Siller, Marcos & Olvera-Vargas, Luis Alberto & Michel-Cuello, Christian, 2018. "Land management in Mexican sugarcane crop fields," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 763-780.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garcia y Garcia, Axel & Guerra, Larry C. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2008. "Impact of generated solar radiation on simulated crop growth and yield," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 312-326.
    2. Xie, Yun & Kiniry, James R. & Williams, Jimmy R., 2003. "The ALMANAC model's sensitivity to input variables," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Čerkasova, Natalja & White, Michael & Arnold, Jeffrey & Bieger, Katrin & Allen, Peter & Gao, Jungang & Gambone, Marilyn & Meki, Manyowa & Kiniry, James & Gassman, Philip W., 2023. "Field scale SWAT+ modeling of corn and soybean yields for the contiguous United States: National Agroecosystem Model Development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. Kiniry, James R. & Bean, Brent & Xie, Yun & Chen, Pei-yu, 2004. "Maize yield potential: critical processes and simulation modeling in a high-yielding environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 45-56, October.
    5. Iqbal, M. Anjum & Shen, Yanjun & Stricevic, Ruzica & Pei, Hongwei & Sun, Hongyoung & Amiri, Ebrahim & Penas, Angel & del Rio, Sara, 2014. "Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 61-72.
    6. Talebizadeh, Mansour & Moriasi, Daniel & Gowda, Prasanna & Steiner, Jean L. & Tadesse, Haile K. & Nelson, Amanda M. & Starks, Patrick, 2018. "Simultaneous calibration of evapotranspiration and crop yield in agronomic system modeling using the APEX model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 299-306.
    7. Ascough II, J.C. & Andales, A.A. & Sherrod, L.A. & McMaster, G.S. & Hansen, N.C. & DeJonge, K.C. & Fathelrahman, E.M. & Ahuja, L.R. & Peterson, G.A. & Hoag, D.L., 2010. "Simulating landscape catena effects in no-till dryland agroecosystems using GPFARM," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(8), pages 569-584, October.
    8. Napoli, Marco & Orlandini, Simone, 2015. "Evaluating the Arc-SWAT2009 in predicting runoff, sediment, and nutrient yields from a vineyard and an olive orchard in Central Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 51-62.
    9. Żyromski, Andrzej & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Biniak-Pieróg, Małgorzata & Jakubowski, Wojciech, 2016. "The estimation of basket willow (Salix viminalis) yield – New approach. Part I: Background and statistical description," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1118-1126.
    10. Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe & Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel & Taguta, Cuthbert & Sikka, Alok & Lautze, Jonathan, 2023. "Mapping Decision Support Tools (DSTs) on agricultural water productivity: A global systematic scoping review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    11. Colas, Floriane & Gauchi, Jean-Pierre & Villerd, Jean & Colbach, Nathalie, 2021. "Simplifying a complex computer model: Sensitivity analysis and metamodelling of an 3D individual-based crop-weed canopy model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 454(C).
    12. Larson, James A. & English, Burton C. & He, Lixia, 2008. "Risk and Return for Bioenergy Crops under Alternative Contracting Arrangements," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6842, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. Zand-Parsa, Sh. & Sepaskhah, A.R. & Ronaghi, A., 2006. "Development and evaluation of integrated water and nitrogen model for maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 227-256, March.
    14. Mahbod, Mehdi & Zand-Parsa, Shahrokh & Sepaskhah, Ali Reza, 2015. "Modification of maize simulation model for predicting growth and yield of winter wheat under different applied water and nitrogen," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 18-34.
    15. Dzotsi, K.A. & Basso, B. & Jones, J.W., 2013. "Development, uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the simple SALUS crop model in DSSAT," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 260(C), pages 62-76.
    16. Jakubowski, Wojciech & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Żyromski, Andrzej & Biniak-Pieróg, Małgorzata, 2016. "The estimation of basket willow (Salix viminalis) yield – New approach, Part II: Theoretical model and its practical application," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 843-851.
    17. Moriasi, Daniel N. & King, Kevin W. & Bosch, David D. & Bjorneberg, Dave L. & Teet, Stephen & Guzman, Jorge A. & Williams, Mark R., 2016. "Framework to parameterize and validate APEX to support deployment of the nutrient tracking tool," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 146-164.
    18. Dzotsi, K.A. & Basso, B. & Jones, J.W., 2015. "Parameter and uncertainty estimation for maize, peanut and cotton using the SALUS crop model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 31-47.
    19. Sumin Kim & James R. Kiniry & Amber S. Williams & Norman Meki & Lewis Gaston & Melinda Brakie & Alan Shadow & Felix B. Fritschi & Yanqi Wu, 2017. "Adaptation of C 4 Bioenergy Crop Species to Various Environments within the Southern Great Plains of USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
    20. Munier-Jolain, N.M. & Guyot, S.H.M. & Colbach, N., 2013. "A 3D model for light interception in heterogeneous crop:weed canopies: Model structure and evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 101-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:8:p:1337-:d:106497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.