IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v210y2008i3p312-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of generated solar radiation on simulated crop growth and yield

Author

Listed:
  • Garcia y Garcia, Axel
  • Guerra, Larry C.
  • Hoogenboom, Gerrit

Abstract

The availability of observed daily solar radiation (OSR) is restricted to recent years. Its estimation through different methods is necessary to develop long-term data sets for agricultural and environmental applications. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of using generated daily solar radiation (GSR) on simulated growth and yield of cotton, maize, and peanut. Nine locations representing Georgia's major crop belt were selected. Daily weather data from the Georgia Automated Environmental Monitoring Network (AEMN), including solar radiation, maximum and minimum temperature, and precipitation, were duplicated. The OSR was removed from one set and then generated using a stochastic procedure. The Cropping System Models (CSM)-CROPGRO-Cotton, CERES-Maize, and CROPGRO-Peanut of the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) v4 were used to simulate crop growth and yield at each location with both OSR and GSR and for rainfed and irrigated conditions. The statistical analysis included summary statistics, Pearson's coefficient of correlation, mean squared deviation (MSD) and its components, namely: squared bias (SB), squared difference between standard deviations (SDSD), lack of correlation weighted by the standard deviations (LCS), and regressions. Within locations, for the three crops under rainfed and irrigated conditions, GSR did not significantly affect simulated total evapotranspiration and aboveground biomass and yields. For the three crops, deviations of simulated water use and yields from GSR with respect to simulated water use and yields from OSR were lower for the rainfed than for the irrigated conditions. Yields from the CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton and -Peanut models had lower deviations than yields from the CSM-CERES-Maize model. LCS was the major component of the MSD suggesting that the extent of the difference between standard deviations of GSR and OSRG could affect the outputs of the crop models. Nevertheless, for most locations none of the MSD components of the GSR showed significant correlation with simulated yields and the overall performance of the models was not affected. It can be concluded based on the results of this study that GSR can be used as an input for crop model simulation models when OSR is not available.

Suggested Citation

  • Garcia y Garcia, Axel & Guerra, Larry C. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2008. "Impact of generated solar radiation on simulated crop growth and yield," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 312-326.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:210:y:2008:i:3:p:312-326
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380007004103
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.08.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bert, Federico E. & Laciana, Carlos E. & Podesta, Guillermo P. & Satorre, Emilio H. & Menendez, Angel N., 2007. "Sensitivity of CERES-Maize simulated yields to uncertainty in soil properties and daily solar radiation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 141-150, May.
    2. Hunt, L. A. & White, J. W. & Hoogenboom, G., 2001. "Agronomic data: advances in documentation and protocols for exchange and use," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 70(2-3), pages 477-492.
    3. Xie, Yun & Kiniry, James R. & Williams, Jimmy R., 2003. "The ALMANAC model's sensitivity to input variables," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Kiniry, James R. & Williams, J. R. & Gassman, Philip W. & Debacke, P., 1992. "General, Process-Oriented Model for Two Competing Plant Species (A)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 483, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Rivington, M. & Matthews, K.B. & Bellocchi, G. & Buchan, K., 2006. "Evaluating uncertainty introduced to process-based simulation model estimates by alternative sources of meteorological data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 451-471, June.
    6. Hartkamp, A. D. & White, J. W. & Hoogenboom, G., 2003. "Comparison of three weather generators for crop modeling: a case study for subtropical environments," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 539-560, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Persson, Tomas & Garcia y Garcia, Axel & Paz, Joel & Jones, Jim & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2009. "Maize ethanol feedstock production and net energy value as affected by climate variability and crop management practices," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 100(1-3), pages 11-21, April.
    2. Qin, Jun & Chen, Zhuoqi & Yang, Kun & Liang, Shunlin & Tang, Wenjun, 2011. "Estimation of monthly-mean daily global solar radiation based on MODIS and TRMM products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2480-2489, July.
    3. Zheng, Zhen & Hoogenboom, Gerrit & Cai, Huanjie & Wang, Zikai, 2020. "Winter wheat production on the Guanzhong Plain of Northwest China under projected future climate with SimCLIM," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    4. Liu, Xuehua & Cheng, Xiangnan & Skidmore, Andrew K., 2011. "Potential solar radiation pattern in relation to the monthly distribution of giant pandas in Foping Nature Reserve, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(3), pages 645-652.
    5. Sebastian Kloss & Raji Pushpalatha & Kefasi Kamoyo & Niels Schütze, 2012. "Evaluation of Crop Models for Simulating and Optimizing Deficit Irrigation Systems in Arid and Semi-arid Countries Under Climate Variability," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(4), pages 997-1014, March.
    6. Li, Meng & Du, Yingji & Zhang, Fucang & Bai, Yungang & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Jianghui & Chen, Shaoming, 2019. "Simulation of cotton growth and soil water content under film-mulched drip irrigation using modified CSM-CROPGRO-cotton model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 124-138.
    7. Salazar, M.R. & Hook, J.E. & Garcia y Garcia, A. & Paz, J.O. & Chaves, B. & Hoogenboom, G., 2012. "Estimating irrigation water use for maize in the Southeastern USA: A modeling approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 104-111.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahbod, Mehdi & Zand-Parsa, Shahrokh & Sepaskhah, Ali Reza, 2015. "Modification of maize simulation model for predicting growth and yield of winter wheat under different applied water and nitrogen," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 18-34.
    2. Mompremier, R. & Her, Y. & Hoogenboom, G. & Migliaccio, K. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Brym, Z. & Colbert, R.W. & Jeune, W., 2021. "Modeling the response of dry bean yield to irrigation water availability controlled by watershed hydrology," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    3. Xie, Yun & Kiniry, James R. & Williams, Jimmy R., 2003. "The ALMANAC model's sensitivity to input variables," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Čerkasova, Natalja & White, Michael & Arnold, Jeffrey & Bieger, Katrin & Allen, Peter & Gao, Jungang & Gambone, Marilyn & Meki, Manyowa & Kiniry, James & Gassman, Philip W., 2023. "Field scale SWAT+ modeling of corn and soybean yields for the contiguous United States: National Agroecosystem Model Development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    5. DeJonge, Kendall C. & Ascough, James C. & Ahmadi, Mehdi & Andales, Allan A. & Arabi, Mazdak, 2012. "Global sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of a dynamic agroecosystem model under different irrigation treatments," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 113-125.
    6. Sardorbek Musayev & Jonathan Mellor & Tara Walsh & Emmanouil Anagnostou, 2022. "Application of Agent-Based Modeling in Agricultural Productivity in Rural Area of Bahir Dar, Ethiopia," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Kiniry, James R. & Bean, Brent & Xie, Yun & Chen, Pei-yu, 2004. "Maize yield potential: critical processes and simulation modeling in a high-yielding environment," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 45-56, October.
    8. Jones, J. W. & Keating, B. A. & Porter, C. H., 2001. "Approaches to modular model development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 70(2-3), pages 421-443.
    9. Iqbal, M. Anjum & Shen, Yanjun & Stricevic, Ruzica & Pei, Hongwei & Sun, Hongyoung & Amiri, Ebrahim & Penas, Angel & del Rio, Sara, 2014. "Evaluation of the FAO AquaCrop model for winter wheat on the North China Plain under deficit irrigation from field experiment to regional yield simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 61-72.
    10. Talebizadeh, Mansour & Moriasi, Daniel & Gowda, Prasanna & Steiner, Jean L. & Tadesse, Haile K. & Nelson, Amanda M. & Starks, Patrick, 2018. "Simultaneous calibration of evapotranspiration and crop yield in agronomic system modeling using the APEX model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 299-306.
    11. Ascough II, J.C. & Andales, A.A. & Sherrod, L.A. & McMaster, G.S. & Hansen, N.C. & DeJonge, K.C. & Fathelrahman, E.M. & Ahuja, L.R. & Peterson, G.A. & Hoag, D.L., 2010. "Simulating landscape catena effects in no-till dryland agroecosystems using GPFARM," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(8), pages 569-584, October.
    12. İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın & Robert G. Haight, 2018. "A review of operations research models in invasive species management: state of the art, challenges, and future directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 357-403, December.
    13. Napoli, Marco & Orlandini, Simone, 2015. "Evaluating the Arc-SWAT2009 in predicting runoff, sediment, and nutrient yields from a vineyard and an olive orchard in Central Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 51-62.
    14. Żyromski, Andrzej & Szulczewski, Wiesław & Biniak-Pieróg, Małgorzata & Jakubowski, Wojciech, 2016. "The estimation of basket willow (Salix viminalis) yield – New approach. Part I: Background and statistical description," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1118-1126.
    15. Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe & Dirwai, Tinashe Lindel & Taguta, Cuthbert & Sikka, Alok & Lautze, Jonathan, 2023. "Mapping Decision Support Tools (DSTs) on agricultural water productivity: A global systematic scoping review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    16. Rivington, M. & Matthews, K.B. & Buchan, K. & Miller, D.G. & Bellocchi, G. & Russell, G., 2013. "Climate change impacts and adaptation scope for agriculture indicated by agro-meteorological metrics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 15-31.
    17. Colas, Floriane & Gauchi, Jean-Pierre & Villerd, Jean & Colbach, Nathalie, 2021. "Simplifying a complex computer model: Sensitivity analysis and metamodelling of an 3D individual-based crop-weed canopy model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 454(C).
    18. Larson, James A. & English, Burton C. & He, Lixia, 2008. "Risk and Return for Bioenergy Crops under Alternative Contracting Arrangements," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6842, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    19. Abhishes Lamsal & Stephen M Welch & Jeffrey W White & Kelly R Thorp & Nora M Bello, 2018. "Estimating parametric phenotypes that determine anthesis date in Zea mays: Challenges in combining ecophysiological models with genetics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    20. Zand-Parsa, Sh. & Sepaskhah, A.R. & Ronaghi, A., 2006. "Development and evaluation of integrated water and nitrogen model for maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(3), pages 227-256, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:210:y:2008:i:3:p:312-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.