IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v454y2021ics0304380021001691.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simplifying a complex computer model: Sensitivity analysis and metamodelling of an 3D individual-based crop-weed canopy model

Author

Listed:
  • Colas, Floriane
  • Gauchi, Jean-Pierre
  • Villerd, Jean
  • Colbach, Nathalie

Abstract

Complex biological models such as mechanistic research models often need to extend their current use to a broader audience. Simplification and faster simulations would increase their use. Here, a step-by-step methodology was developed and applied to partially metamodel, hence accelerate, the mechanistic model FlorSys. This is a process-based, multiannual and multispecies model ("virtual field") which simulates crop growth and weed dynamics and allows users to assess cropping systems for crop production and biodiversity. The model is relatively slow, which makes it difficult to test numerous and diverse cropping systems needed to identify those reconciling crop production and biodiversity. Here, we (1) identified the slowest submodel of FlorSys, i.e. the 3D voxelized light interception submodel, (2) identified and applied a relevant methodology to metamodel this submodel in the simplest situation, i.e. we predicted light interception and absorption directly at the scale of the plant instead of the voxel for a single plant in a field, and (3) extrapolated the method to more complex situations, i.e. a plant in diverse and heterogeneous crop:weed canopies, (4) replaced the original process-based FlorSys submodel by the metamodels, which required additional equations and decision rules, (5) evaluated the metamodelled FlorSys with independent field observations, showing an adequate prediction quality combined with an increased speed at fine-grained scale since the metamodelled version was 28 times faster than the process-based version. For steps 2 and 3, we used the global sensitivity method based on a truncated Legendre polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) whose coefficients were estimated by Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression to simultaneously (i) rank inputs with respect to their polynomial and total effects on outputs via the so-called PCE-PLS sensitivity indices, and (ii) provide metamodels predicting light interception and absorption at the plant level. These metamodels were then shortened into parsimonious metamodels via a LASSO-PLS method. The study showed that there was a trade-off between speed gain due to the metamodelled 3D light submodel and the speed loss due to the additional functions for neighbourhood effects. The metamodelled version is best used for testing complex systems where plant location must be modelled precisley (e.g., precision agriculture, intercropping with precision sowing) whereas the voxelized version with a large voxel size is better for simpler cropping systems. The present step-by-step process may be helpful for investigating and speeding up other complex simulation models with interacting objects/agents. It notably uses a hybrid approach, using a process-based (albeit simplified) approach for the most sensitive plant stage (newly emerged tiny plants) and separate sampling plans and metamodels to ensure that the more sensitive stages/components are adequately covered (small plants).

Suggested Citation

  • Colas, Floriane & Gauchi, Jean-Pierre & Villerd, Jean & Colbach, Nathalie, 2021. "Simplifying a complex computer model: Sensitivity analysis and metamodelling of an 3D individual-based crop-weed canopy model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 454(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:454:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021001691
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380021001691
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gardarin, Antoine & Dürr, Carolyne & Colbach, Nathalie, 2012. "Modeling the dynamics and emergence of a multispecies weed seed bank with species traits," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 240(C), pages 123-138.
    2. Munier-Jolain, N.M. & Guyot, S.H.M. & Colbach, N., 2013. "A 3D model for light interception in heterogeneous crop:weed canopies: Model structure and evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 101-110.
    3. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    4. Graf, B. & Gutierrez, A. P. & Rakotobe, O. & Zahner, P. & Delucchi, V., 1990. "A simulation model for the dynamics of rice growth and development: Part II--The competition with weeds for nitrogen and light," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 367-392.
    5. Kiniry, James R. & Williams, J. R. & Gassman, Philip W. & Debacke, P., 1992. "General, Process-Oriented Model for Two Competing Plant Species (A)," Staff General Research Papers Archive 483, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    6. Hussain, Mohammed F. & Barton, Russel R. & Joshi, Sanjay B., 2002. "Metamodeling: Radial basis functions, versus polynomials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 142-154, April.
    7. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Munier-Jolain, N.M. & Guyot, S.H.M. & Colbach, N., 2013. "A 3D model for light interception in heterogeneous crop:weed canopies: Model structure and evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 101-110.
    2. Movedi, Ermes & Valiante, Daniele & Colosio, Alessandro & Corengia, Luca & Cossa, Stefano & Confalonieri, Roberto, 2022. "A new approach for modeling crop-weed interaction targeting management support in operational contexts: A case study on the rice weeds barnyardgrass and red rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    3. Scott L. Rosen & Christopher P. Saunders & Samar K Guharay, 2015. "A Structured Approach for Rapidly Mapping Multilevel System Measures via Simulation Metamodeling," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 87-101, January.
    4. Queyrel, Wilfried & Van Inghelandt, Bastien & Colas, Floriane & Cavan, Nicolas & Granger, Sylvie & Guyot, Bérénice & Reau, Raymond & Derrouch, Damien & Chauvel, Bruno & Maillot, Thibault & Colbach, Na, 2023. "Combining expert knowledge and models in participatory workshops with farmers to design sustainable weed management strategies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Mert Edali & Gönenç Yücel, 2020. "Analysis of an individual‐based influenza epidemic model using random forest metamodels and adaptive sequential sampling," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 936-958, November.
    6. Seidel, Claudia & Shang, Linmei & Britz, Wolfgang, 2023. "A critical assessment of neural networks as meta-model of a farm optimization model," Discussion Papers 338200, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    7. Marrel, Amandine & Iooss, Bertrand & Laurent, Béatrice & Roustant, Olivier, 2009. "Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 742-751.
    8. Cavan, Nicolas & Omon, Bertrand & Dubois, Sophie & Toqué, Clotilde & Van Inghelandt, Bastien & Queyrel, Wilfried & Colbach, Nathalie & Angevin, Frédérique, 2023. "Model-based evaluation in terms of weed management and overall sustainability of cropping systems designed with three different approaches," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    9. Poropudas, Jirka & Virtanen, Kai, 2011. "Simulation metamodeling with dynamic Bayesian networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(3), pages 644-655, November.
    10. Bürger, Jana & Darmency, Henri & Granger, Sylvie & Guyot, Sébastien H.M. & Messéan, Antoine & Colbach, Nathalie, 2015. "Simulation study of the impact of changed cropping practices in conventional and GM maize on weeds and associated biodiversity," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 51-63.
    11. Pointurier, Olivia & Moreau, Delphine & Pagès, Loïc & Caneill, Jacques & Colbach, Nathalie, 2021. "Individual-based 3D modelling of root systems in heterogeneous plant canopies at the multiannual scale. Case study with a weed dynamics model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 440(C).
    12. Katarzyna Growiec & Jakub Growiec & Bogumil Kaminski, 2017. "Social Network Structure and The Trade-Off Between Social Utility and Economic Performance," KAE Working Papers 2017-026, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis.
    13. Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 2005. "An overview of the design and analysis of simulation experiments for sensitivity analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 287-300, July.
    14. Acharki, Naoufal & Bertoncello, Antoine & Garnier, Josselin, 2023. "Robust prediction interval estimation for Gaussian processes by cross-validation method," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    15. Xu, Jun & Wang, Ding, 2019. "Structural reliability analysis based on polynomial chaos, Voronoi cells and dimension reduction technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 329-340.
    16. Matieyendou Lamboni, 2020. "Uncertainty quantification: a minimum variance unbiased (joint) estimator of the non-normalized Sobol’ indices," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(5), pages 1939-1970, October.
    17. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    18. Garcia y Garcia, Axel & Guerra, Larry C. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2008. "Impact of generated solar radiation on simulated crop growth and yield," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(3), pages 312-326.
    19. Xie, Yun & Kiniry, James R. & Williams, Jimmy R., 2003. "The ALMANAC model's sensitivity to input variables," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Nguyen, Phong T.T. & Manuel, Lance, 2024. "Uncertainty quantification in low-probability response estimation using sliced inverse regression and polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:454:y:2021:i:c:s0304380021001691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.