IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i6p884-d99539.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Impact of Mobile Technology on Exhibition Attendees’ Unplanned Booth Visit Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Namho Chung

    (College of Hotel & Tourism Management, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyunghee-daro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Chulmo Koo

    (College of Hotel & Tourism Management, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyunghee-daro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea)

  • Kyungmin Lee

    (Department of Convention & Exhibition Management, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyunghee-daro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02447, Korea)

Abstract

This study examines the effect of the booth Recommender system (BRS) embedded in a mobile device on the goals of exhibition attendees, based on two main theories that are unplanned behaviour and goal frame theories. Previous studies have overlooked the importance of the unplanned behavioural effectiveness of IT devices for understanding motivation and delivering unexpected outcomes at exhibitions. The BRS offers customized, personalized, and advanced information to attendees; experiences with the BRS lead to unplanned behaviour. In this paper, we distinguish several goal frames, including hedonic, gain, and normative goals, which contribute to the relationship between continued BRS use and unplanned booth visits. Continued BRS use directly influences revisit intentions to an exhibition and contributes to unplanned booth visits. We analysed data from 508 attendees at a franchise exhibition using structural equation modelling (SEM) method. Our research empirically determined that goal framing theory and unplanned behaviour via continued BRS use embedded in a mobile device are connected. Continued BRS use in an exhibition can contribute to attendees’ impulsive behaviour and can induce them to return to an exhibition. The results and implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Namho Chung & Chulmo Koo & Kyungmin Lee, 2017. "Assessing the Impact of Mobile Technology on Exhibition Attendees’ Unplanned Booth Visit Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:884-:d:99539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/884/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/6/884/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clee, Mona A & Wicklund, Robert A, 1980. "Consumer Behavior and Psychological Reactance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 6(4), pages 389-405, March.
    2. Se-Joon Hong & Kar Yan Tam, 2006. "Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 162-179, June.
    3. Kolm, Serge-Christophe, 1994. "Rational normative economics vs 'social welfare' and 'social choice'," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(3-4), pages 721-730, April.
    4. Russell Abratt & Stephen Donald Goodey, 1990. "Unplanned buying and in‐store stimuli in supermarkets," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(2), pages 111-121, May.
    5. D. Veena Parboteeah & Joseph S. Valacich & John D. Wells, 2009. "The Influence of Website Characteristics on a Consumer's Urge to Buy Impulsively," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 60-78, March.
    6. Chen, Gilad & Mathieu, John E., 2008. "Goal orientation dispositions and performance trajectories: The roles of supplementary and complementary situational inducements," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 21-38, May.
    7. Rook, Dennis W & Fisher, Robert J, 1995. "Normative Influences on Impulsive Buying Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(3), pages 305-313, December.
    8. Shirley Taylor & Peter A. Todd, 1995. "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 144-176, June.
    9. Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy & Carter, Patrick & Blair, Edward, 2001. "Attribute Framing and Goal Framing Effects in Health Decisions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 382-399, July.
    10. James C. Anderson & David W. Gerbing, 1992. "Assumptions and Comparative Strengths of the Two-Step Approach," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 20(3), pages 321-333, February.
    11. Huerta, Esperanza & Glandon, TerryAnn & Petrides, Yanira, 2012. "Framing, decision-aid systems, and culture: Exploring influences on fraud investigations," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 316-333.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ronald Baganzi & Antonio K. W. Lau, 2017. "Examining Trust and Risk in Mobile Money Acceptance in Uganda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Ronald Baganzi & Geon-Cheol Shin & Shali Wu, 2019. "Examining Consumers’ Attitudes toward Gmarket Online Shopping," J, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-20, August.
    3. Chaeyoung Lim & Noha Mostafa & Jaehyun Park, 2017. "Digital Omotenashi: Toward a Smart Tourism Design Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Dongwook Kim & Sungbum Kim, 2017. "The Role of Mobile Technology in Tourism: Patents, Articles, News, and Mobile Tour App Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-45, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Ing-Long & Chen, Kuei-Wan & Chiu, Mai-Lun, 2016. "Defining key drivers of online impulse purchasing: A perspective of both impulse shoppers and system users," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 284-296.
    2. Gopalkrishnan R. Iyer & Markus Blut & Sarah Hong Xiao & Dhruv Grewal, 2020. "Impulse buying: a meta-analytic review," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 384-404, May.
    3. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    4. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    5. Zhiyuan Yu & Doudou Jin, 2021. "Determinants of Users’ Attitude and Intention to Intelligent Connected Vehicle Infotainment in the 5G-V2X Mobile Ecosystem," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-19, September.
    6. Yi Yong Lee & Chin Lay Gan, 2020. "Applications of SOR and para-social interactions (PSI) towards impulse buying: the Malaysian perspective," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 85-98, June.
    7. Lara Stocchi & Naser Pourazad & Nina Michaelidou & Arry Tanusondjaja & Paul Harrigan, 2022. "Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 195-225, March.
    8. Yi Yong Lee & Chin Lay Gan, 0. "Applications of SOR and para-social interactions (PSI) towards impulse buying: the Malaysian perspective," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    9. Radoslaw Macik & Dorota Macik, 2011. "Physical vs. Virtual Information Search and Purchase in the Buying Behavior of Polish Young Consumers," MIC 2011: Managing Sustainability? Proceedings of the 12th International Conference, Portorož, 23–26 November 2011 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    10. Supriya M. Kalla & A.P. Arora, 2011. "Impulse Buying," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 145-157, February.
    11. Acuña-Muñoz, Oscar Andrés, 2021. "Design and validation of an instrument for measuring socio-cultural and demographic factors that impact the adoption of an innovative financial service," TEC Empresarial, School of Business, Costa Rica Institute of Technology (ITCR), vol. 15(2), pages 68-98.
    12. Rajak, Manindra & Shaw, Krishnendu, 2021. "An extension of technology acceptance model for mHealth user adoption," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Hossain Md. Motaher & Zahidul Islam K. M. & Masud Abdullah Al & Biswas Sukanta & Hossain Md. Alamgir, 2021. "Behavioral intention and continued adoption of Facebook: An exploratory study of graduate students in Bangladesh during the Covid-19 pandemic," Management, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 153-186, December.
    14. Lifu Li & Yafei Feng & Anqi Zhao, 2024. "An interaction–immersion model in live streaming commerce: the moderating role of streamer attractiveness," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(3), pages 701-716, September.
    15. Kimiagari, Salman & Asadi Malafe, Neda Sharifi, 2021. "The role of cognitive and affective responses in the relationship between internal and external stimuli on online impulse buying behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Kim, Hyung Jin & Kim, Inchan & Lee, Hogeun, 2016. "Third-party mobile app developers’ continued participation in platform-centric ecosystems: An empirical investigation of two different mechanisms," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 44-59.
    17. Farah, Maya F. & Ramadan, Zahy B., 2017. "Disruptions versus more disruptions: How the Amazon dash button is altering consumer buying patterns," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 54-61.
    18. Jian Tang & Ping Zhang & Philip Fei Wu, 2015. "Categorizing consumer behavioral responses and artifact design features: The case of online advertising," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 513-532, June.
    19. Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva & J. Sánchez-Fernández, 2018. "A global approach to the analysis of user behavior in mobile payment systems in the new electronic environment," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 25-64, March.
    20. Tafesse, Wondwesen & Korneliussen, Tor, 2012. "Identifying factors affecting consumers purchase incidence at retail trade shows," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 438-444.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:6:p:884-:d:99539. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.