IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i5p710-d97146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust-Embedded Information Sharing among One Agent and Two Retailers in an Order Recommendation System

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Fu

    (Institute of Innovation and Development, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310012, China)

  • Guanghua Han

    (School of International and Public Affairs, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China)

Abstract

Trust potentially affects the decision-makers’ behaviors and has a great influence on supply chain performances. We study the information sharing process considering trust in a two-tier supply chain with one upstream agent and two retailers, where the agent recommends ordered quantities (ROQ) to retailers and the retailer decides her/his ordered quantities according to the agent’s recommendation and self-collected information. There exist three types of information sharing patterns among the agent and two retailers, i.e., both retailers share their demand prediction (Pattern 1), one retailer shares her/his demand prediction (Pattern 2) and none of the retailers share their demand prediction (Pattern 3). Thus, we build corresponding mathematical models and analyze each party’s decision strategies in each pattern, respectively. The findings in this study show that sharing information can generally promote trust among enterprises in the entire supply chain and increase their profits in return. It is found that when the accuracies of the two retailers’ predicted demand differs, their behaviors of information sharing or not sharing significantly affect their expected profits. In Pattern 1 and Pattern 3, we find that retailers’ expected profits are negatively influenced by the agent’s accuracies of demand prediction. However, the retailer’s expected profits are positively linked to the agent’s accuracies of demand in Pattern 2. Consequently, we propose a series of strategies for retailers in different decision patterns after several simulation runs. In addition, we also find that the retailer whose prediction is less accurate can also gain more profits by un-sharing his/her demand prediction when the agent’s predict accuracy is between the two retailers.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Fu & Guanghua Han, 2017. "Trust-Embedded Information Sharing among One Agent and Two Retailers in an Order Recommendation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:710-:d:97146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/710/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/5/710/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laaksonen, Toni & Jarimo, Toni & Kulmala, Harri I., 2009. "Cooperative strategies in customer-supplier relationships: The role of interfirm trust," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 79-87, July.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang, 2000. "The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 626-643, May.
    3. Chang, Liu & Ouzrout, Yacine & Nongaillard, Antoine & Bouras, Abdelaziz & Jiliu, Zhou, 2014. "Multi-criteria decision making based on trust and reputation in supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 362-372.
    4. Kwang O. Park & Hwalsik Chang & Dae Hyun Jung, 2017. "How Do Power Type and Partnership Quality Affect Supply Chain Management Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Kaijie Zhu & Ulrich W. Thonemann, 2004. "Modeling the Benefits of Sharing Future Demand Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 136-147, February.
    6. Guanghua Han & Ming Dong, 2015. "Trust-embedded coordination in supply chain information sharing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 5624-5639, September.
    7. Terry A. Taylor & Erica L. Plambeck, 2007. "Supply Chain Relationships and Contracts: The Impact of Repeated Interaction on Capacity Investment and Procurement," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(10), pages 1577-1593, October.
    8. Z. Justin Ren & Morris A. Cohen & Teck H. Ho & Christian Terwiesch, 2010. "Information Sharing in a Long-Term Supply Chain Relationship: The Role of Customer Review Strategy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 81-93, February.
    9. Lode Li, 2002. "Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with Horizontal Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(9), pages 1196-1212, September.
    10. Panayides, Photis M. & Venus Lun, Y.H., 2009. "The impact of trust on innovativeness and supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(1), pages 35-46, November.
    11. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng & Kay-Yut Chen, 2011. "Trust in Forecast Information Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1111-1137, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hyunwoo Hwangbo & Yangsok Kim, 2019. "Session-Based Recommender System for Sustainable Digital Marketing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Rasool Lavaei Adaryani & Khalil Kalantari & Ali Asadi & Amir Alambeigi & Hesamedin Gholami & Naser Seifollahi, 2023. "Information sharing antecedents in the supply chain: a dynamic network perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 887-903, June.
    3. Raheleh Hassannia & Ali Vatankhah Barenji & Zhi Li & Habib Alipour, 2019. "Web-Based Recommendation System for Smart Tourism: Multiagent Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Hosang Jung & Sukjae Jeong, 2018. "The Economic Effect of Virtual Warehouse-Based Inventory Information Sharing for Sustainable Supplier Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leon Yang Chu & Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2017. "Strategic Communication for Capacity Alignment with Pricing in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4366-4377, December.
    2. Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2016. "Public Forecast Information Sharing in a Market with Competing Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2994-3022, October.
    3. Avinadav, Tal & Shamir, Noam, 2021. "The effect of information asymmetry on ordering and capacity decisions in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 562-578.
    4. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2021. "Incentive of retailer information sharing on manufacturer volume flexibility choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Yu, Yanan & He, Yong & Zhao, Xuan, 2021. "Impact of demand information sharing on organic farming adoption: An evolutionary game approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Hyoduk Shin & Tunay I. Tunca, 2010. "Do Firms Invest in Forecasting Efficiently? The Effect of Competition on Demand Forecast Investments and Supply Chain Coordination," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1592-1610, December.
    7. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    8. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Consumer taste uncertainty in the context of store brand and national brand competition," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    9. Zhang, Jian & Nault, Barrie R., 2023. "Information sharing in an MTO supply chain with upstream adjustments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 97-112.
    10. Kefeng Xu & Yang Dong & Yu Xia, 2014. "‘Too Little’ or ‘Too Late’: The Timing of Supply Chain Demand Collaboration," Working Papers 0203mss, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    11. Gong, Canran & Ignatius, Joshua & Song, Huaming & Chai, Junwu & Day, Steven James, 2024. "The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 141-155.
    12. Mukhopadhyay, Samar K. & Yue, Xiaohang & Zhu, Xiaowei, 2011. "A Stackelberg model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 424-433, December.
    13. Yu, Yugang & Zhou, Sijie & Shi, Ye, 2020. "Information sharing or not across the supply chain: The role of carbon emission reduction," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Chonnikarn (Fern) Jira & Michael W. Toffel, 2013. "Engaging Supply Chains in Climate Change," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 559-577, October.
    15. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng & Yufei Ren, 2014. "Trust, Trustworthiness, and Information Sharing in Supply Chains Bridging China and the United States," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2435-2460, October.
    16. Onur Kaya & Serra Caner, 2018. "Supply chain contracts for capacity decisions under symmetric and asymmetric information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 26(1), pages 67-92, March.
    17. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    18. Zhang, Xumei & Zha, Xiaoyu & Dan, Bin & Liu, Yi & Sui, Ronghua, 2024. "Logistics mode selection and information sharing in a cross-border e-commerce supply chain with competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 136-151.
    19. Albert Y. Ha & Quan Tian & Shilu Tong, 2017. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Production Cost Reduction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 246-262, May.
    20. Guangwen Kong & Sampath Rajagopalan & Hao Zhang, 2013. "Revenue Sharing and Information Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 556-572, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:5:p:710-:d:97146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.