IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v100y2021ics0305048319303846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentive of retailer information sharing on manufacturer volume flexibility choice

Author

Listed:
  • Wei, Liqun
  • Zhang, Jianxiong
  • Zhu, Guowei

Abstract

This paper considers a supply chain where a manufacturer builds the capacity and sets the wholesale price, and a retailer sets retail price and holds the advantage of demand information. There are two means to solve supply-demand mismatch: the retailer makes the forecast information-sharing strategy, and the manufacturer chooses volume flexibility that can postpone production after demand is observed. We focus on the retailer’s incentive for sharing private forecast information which is made to affect the follow-up action of manufacturer’s volume flexibility choice. A multi-stage game is formulated and the equilibria are obtained. It is shown that if the market fluctuation is relatively large, the manufacturer is more willing to choose volume flexibility under information sharing than under no information sharing; otherwise, the manufacturer is less willing to choose volume flexibility under information sharing than under no information sharing. Further, when the investment cost is relatively large and market fluctuation is relatively small, there may arise a prisoner’s dilemma, such that neither means (information sharing or volume flexibility) is taken, but higher profits are attained through implementing the two means. Last, if information-sharing commitment is made after volume flexibility choice, the retailer never shares the forecast information when the manufacturer commits to choosing volume flexibility, which enlarges the system parameter region for the prisoner’s dilemma occurring. Thus, it is optimal for both parties with the information-sharing decision made before volume flexibility choice.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong & Zhu, Guowei, 2021. "Incentive of retailer information sharing on manufacturer volume flexibility choice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s0305048319303846
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048319303846
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boute, Robert N. & Disney, Stephen M. & Lambrecht, Marc R. & Van Houdt, Benny, 2009. "Designing replenishment rules in a two-echelon supply chain with a flexible or an inflexible capacity strategy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 187-198, May.
    2. Ravi Anupindi & Li Jiang, 2008. "Capacity Investment Under Postponement Strategies, Market Competition, and Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(11), pages 1876-1890, November.
    3. Altendorfer, Klaus, 2017. "Relation between lead time dependent demand and capacity flexibility in a two-stage supply chain with lost sales," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 13-24.
    4. Liu Yang & Chi To Ng & Yaodong Ni, 2017. "Flexible capacity strategy in an asymmetric oligopoly market with competition and demand uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 117-138, March.
    5. Özalp Özer & Wei Wei, 2006. "Strategic Commitments for an Optimal Capacity Decision Under Asymmetric Forecast Information," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(8), pages 1238-1257, August.
    6. Blanchard, Olivier J, 1983. "The Production and Inventory Behavior of the American Automobile Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 91(3), pages 365-400, June.
    7. Jin, Yan & Vonderembse, Mark & Ragu-Nathan, T.S. & Smith, Joy Turnheim, 2014. "Exploring relationships among IT-enabled sharing capability, supply chain flexibility, and competitive performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 24-34.
    8. Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine, 2007. "Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 192-207, February.
    9. Krishnan S. Anand & Karan Girotra, 2007. "The Strategic Perils of Delayed Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 697-712, May.
    10. Dominguez, Roberto & Cannella, Salvatore & Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana P. & Framinan, Jose M., 2018. "Information sharing in supply chains with heterogeneous retailers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 116-132.
    11. Z. Justin Ren & Morris A. Cohen & Teck H. Ho & Christian Terwiesch, 2010. "Information Sharing in a Long-Term Supply Chain Relationship: The Role of Customer Review Strategy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 81-93, February.
    12. Amir Fazli & Amin Sayedi & Jeffrey D. Shulman, 2018. "The Effects of Autoscaling in Cloud Computing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5149-5163, November.
    13. Ebrahim Nejad, Alireza & Niroomand, Iman & Kuzgunkaya, Onur, 2014. "Responsive contingency planning in supply risk management by considering congestion effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 19-35.
    14. Krishnan S. Anand & Manu Goyal, 2009. "Strategic Information Management Under Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 438-452, March.
    15. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    16. Liang Guo, 2009. "The Benefits of Downstream Information Acquisition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 457-471, 05-06.
    17. Mills, David E, 1984. "Demand Fluctuations and Endogenous Firm Flexibility," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 55-71, September.
    18. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong & Dai, Rui & Zhu, Guowei, 2019. "Green flexible vs. inflexible capacity strategies for duopoly," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 247-267.
    19. Guanghua Han & Ming Dong, 2015. "Trust-embedded coordination in supply chain information sharing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(18), pages 5624-5639, September.
    20. Yang, Liu & Ng, C.T., 2014. "Flexible capacity strategy with multiple market periods under demand uncertainty and investment constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 511-521.
    21. Xiaole Wu & Fuqiang Zhang, 2014. "Home or Overseas? An Analysis of Sourcing Strategies Under Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1223-1240, May.
    22. Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine, 2011. "Volume Flexibility, Product Flexibility, or Both: The Role of Demand Correlation and Product Substitution," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 180-193, March.
    23. Özalp Özer & Yanchong Zheng & Kay-Yut Chen, 2011. "Trust in Forecast Information Sharing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1111-1137, June.
    24. Arya, Anil & Mittendorf, Brian, 2013. "Discretionary disclosure in the presence of dual distribution channels," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 168-182.
    25. Albert Y. Ha & Quan Tian & Shilu Tong, 2017. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Production Cost Reduction," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 246-262, May.
    26. Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2008. "Contracting and Information Sharing Under Supply Chain Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 701-715, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feiyan Han & Herui Wang & Hongyu Lv & Bo Li, 2022. "Research on Manufacturers’ Referral Strategy Considering Store Brand Retailers and Traditional Retailers," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(18), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Ma, Shanshan & Li, Guo & Sethi, Suresh P. & Zhao, Xuan, 2022. "Advance booking discount strategies: Competition, information transparency and spot market," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    3. Xu, Hongyan & Liu, Xiaomin & Huang, He, 2023. "Information sharing and order allocation rule in dual-sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Ma, Miaomiao & Meng, Weidong & Huang, Bo & Li, Yuyu, 2023. "The influence of dual credit policy on new energy vehicle technology innovation under demand forecast information asymmetry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    5. Hsiao, Lu & Chen, Ying-Ju & Xiong, Hui & Liu, Haoyu, 2022. "Incentives for disclosing the store brand supplier," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Li, Xi & Liu, Qian, 2023. "Strategic ignorance: Managing endogenous demand in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Fu, Ke & Wang, Ce & Xu, Jiayan, 2022. "The impact of trade credit on information sharing in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    8. Zhang, Xumei & Zha, Xiaoyu & Dan, Bin & Liu, Yi & Sui, Ronghua, 2024. "Logistics mode selection and information sharing in a cross-border e-commerce supply chain with competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(1), pages 136-151.
    9. Li, Qiu-xiang & Ji, Hui-min & Huang, Yi-min, 2022. "The information leakage strategies of the supply chain under the block chain technology introduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Liqun & Zhang, Jianxiong & Dai, Rui & Zhu, Guowei, 2019. "Green flexible vs. inflexible capacity strategies for duopoly," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 247-267.
    2. Oded Berman & Mohammad M. Fazel-Zarandi & Dmitry Krass, 2019. "Truthful Cheap Talk: Why Operational Flexibility May Lead to Truthful Communication," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1624-1641, April.
    3. Liu Yang & Chi To Ng & Yaodong Ni, 2017. "Flexible capacity strategy in an asymmetric oligopoly market with competition and demand uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 117-138, March.
    4. Yang, Liu & Ng, Chi To & Cheng, T.C.E. & Sun, Mingyao & Shao, Xuefeng & Li, Ruiqing, 2024. "Competition under demand uncertainty: The roles of technology and capacity strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 185-204.
    5. Zhiyuan Wang & Zhiqiang (Eric) Zheng & Wei Jiang & Shaojie Tang, 2021. "Blockchain‐Enabled Data Sharing in Supply Chains: Model, Operationalization, and Tutorial," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 1965-1985, July.
    6. Albert Y. Ha & Huajiang Luo & Weixin Shang, 2022. "Supplier Encroachment, Information Sharing, and Channel Structure in Online Retail Platforms," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1235-1251, March.
    7. Leon Yang Chu & Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2017. "Strategic Communication for Capacity Alignment with Pricing in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(12), pages 4366-4377, December.
    8. Li, Xi & Liu, Qian, 2023. "Strategic ignorance: Managing endogenous demand in a supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    9. Xu, Hongyan & Liu, Xiaomin & Huang, He, 2023. "Information sharing and order allocation rule in dual-sourcing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Wu, Junjian & Wang, Haiyan & Shang, Jennifer, 2019. "Multi-sourcing and information sharing under competition and supply uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 658-671.
    11. Avinadav, Tal & Shamir, Noam, 2021. "The effect of information asymmetry on ordering and capacity decisions in supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 562-578.
    12. Weidong Zhang & Fuqiang Wang, 2022. "Information Sharing in Competing Supply Chains with Carbon Emissions Reduction Incentives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Tian Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2023. "Gaining by ceding ‐ bounded wholesale pricing for information sharing in a supply chain," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(3), pages 829-843, March.
    14. Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine, 2011. "Volume Flexibility, Product Flexibility, or Both: The Role of Demand Correlation and Product Substitution," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 180-193, March.
    15. Yang, Liu & Wang, Yonggui & Ma, Jun & Ng, Chi To & Cheng, T.C.E., 2014. "Technology investment under flexible capacity strategy with demand uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 190-197.
    16. Noam Shamir & Hyoduk Shin, 2016. "Public Forecast Information Sharing in a Market with Competing Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(10), pages 2994-3022, October.
    17. Yang, L. & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2011. "Optimal production strategy under demand fluctuations: Technology versus capacity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 393-402, October.
    18. Bin Shen & Hau-Ling Chan, 2017. "Forecast Information Sharing for Managing Supply Chains in the Big Data Era: Recent Development and Future Research," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-26, February.
    19. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Consumer taste uncertainty in the context of store brand and national brand competition," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    20. Yong Zha & Quan Li & Tingliang Huang & Yugang Yu, 2023. "Strategic Information Sharing of Online Platforms as Resellers or Marketplaces," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 659-678, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:100:y:2021:i:c:s0305048319303846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.