IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i1p153-d88352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Emergy-Based Hybrid Method for Assessing Sustainability of the Resource-Dependent Region

Author

Listed:
  • Lulu Qu

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xueyi Shi

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chang Liu

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Ye Yuan

    (College of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

As the natural resources are getting exhausted, the concept of sustainable development of regions has received increasing attention, especially for resource-dependent cities. In this paper, an innovative method based on emergy analysis and the Human Impact Population Affluence Technology (IPAT) model is developed to analyze the quantitative relationship of economic growth, energy consumption and its overall sustainability level. Taiyuan, a traditional, resource-dependent city in China, is selected as the case study region. The main results show that the total emergy of Taiyuan increased from 9.023 × 10 23 sej in 2007 to 9.116 × 10 23 sej in 2014, with a 38% decline in non-renewable emergy and an increase of imported emergy up to 125%. The regional emergy money ratio (EMB) was reduced by 48% from 5.31 × 10 13 sej/$ in 2007 to 2.74 × 10 13 sej/$ in 2014, indicating that the increasing speed of consuming resources and energy was faster than the increase of GDP, and that Taiyuan’s money purchasing power declined. The lower emergy sustainability index (ESI) indicates that Taiyuan was explored and produced large quantities of mineral resources, which puts more stress on the environment as a consequence, and that this is not sustainable in the long run. The IPAT analysis demonstrates that Taiyuan sticks to the efforts of energy conservation and environmental protection. In order to promote regional sustainable development, it is necessary to have an integrated effort. Policy insights suggest that resourceful regions should improve energy and resource efficiency, optimize energy and resourceful structure and carry out extensive public participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Lulu Qu & Xueyi Shi & Chang Liu & Ye Yuan, 2017. "An Emergy-Based Hybrid Method for Assessing Sustainability of the Resource-Dependent Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:153-:d:88352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/153/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/1/153/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Yong & Li, Jinchang & Zhang, Hong, 2012. "An ecosystem service valuation of land use change in Taiyuan City, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 127-132.
    2. Yang, Dewei & Kao, William Tze Ming & Zhang, Guoqin & Zhang, Nanyang, 2014. "Evaluating spatiotemporal differences and sustainability of Xiamen urban metabolism using emergy synthesis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 272(C), pages 40-48.
    3. Muniz, Ivan & Galindo, Anna, 2005. "Urban form and the ecological footprint of commuting. The case of Barcelona," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 499-514, December.
    4. Lund, Henrik, 2007. "Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 912-919.
    5. Elliott Campbell & Mark Brown, 2012. "Environmental accounting of natural capital and ecosystem services for the US National Forest System," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(5), pages 691-724, October.
    6. Zhang, Yan & Yang, Zhifeng & Liu, Gengyuan & Yu, Xiangyi, 2011. "Emergy analysis of the urban metabolism of Beijing," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2377-2384.
    7. Sai Liang & Tianzhu Zhang, 2011. "Urban Metabolism in China Achieving Dematerialization and Decarbonization in Suzhou," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 420-434, June.
    8. Xiaowei Yao & Zhanqi Wang & Hongwei Zhang, 2016. "Dynamic Changes of the Ecological Footprint and Its Component Analysis Response to Land Use in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Takeshita, Takayuki, 2012. "Assessing the co-benefits of CO2 mitigation on air pollutants emissions from road vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 225-237.
    10. Liu, Zhu & Liang, Sai & Geng, Yong & Xue, Bing & Xi, Fengming & Pan, Ying & Zhang, Tianzhu & Fujita, Tsuyoshi, 2012. "Features, trajectories and driving forces for energy-related GHG emissions from Chinese mega cites: The case of Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai and Chongqing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 245-254.
    11. Nian, Victor, 2016. "Analysis of interconnecting energy systems over a synchronized life cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 1024-1036.
    12. González-Mejía, Alejandra M. & Ma, Xin (Cissy), 2017. "The Emergy Perspective of Sustainable Trends in Puerto Rico From 1960 to 2013," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 11-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ajun Wan & Runqiu Tu & Weidong Yue & Yixuan Liu & Yunpeng Wu, 2021. "Construction and case study of rural environmental value-added evaluation system based on emergy theory," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4715-4734, March.
    2. Oleksandr Galychyn & B.D. Fath & D. Wiedenhofer & E. Buonocore & P.P. Franzese, 2024. "An urban emergy footprint: Comparing supply- and use-extended input-output models for the case of Vienna, Austria," Post-Print hal-04507173, HAL.
    3. Lu, Yanhua & Yan, Lijuan & Li, Jie & Liang, Yunliang & Yang, Chuanjie & Li, Guang & Wu, Jiangqi & Xu, Hua, 2024. "Spatiotemporal evolution of county level ecological security based on an emergy ecological footprint model: The case of Dingxi, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 490(C).
    4. Henrique Oliveira & Víctor Moutinho, 2021. "Renewable Energy, Economic Growth and Economic Development Nexus: A Bibliometric Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, July.
    5. Alizadeh, Sadegh & Avami, Akram, 2021. "Development of a framework for the sustainability evaluation of renewable and fossil fuel power plants using integrated LCA-emergy analysis: A case study in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1548-1564.
    6. Ting Chang & Degang Yang & Jinwei Huo & Fuqiang Xia & Zhiping Zhang, 2018. "Evaluation of Oasis Sustainability Based on Emergy and Decomposition Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Xiaoman & Geng, Yong & Dong, Huijuan & Ulgiati, Sergio & Liu, Zhe & Liu, Zuoxi & Ma, Zhixiao & Tian, Xu & Sun, Lu, 2016. "Sustainability assessment of one industrial region: A combined method of emergy analysis and IPAT (Human Impact Population Affluence Technology)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 818-830.
    2. Giordano, P. & Caputo, P. & Vancheri, A., 2014. "Fuzzy evaluation of heterogeneous quantities: Measuring urban ecological efficiency," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 288(C), pages 112-126.
    3. Ricardo Enrique Vega-Azamar & Rabindranarth Romero-López & Mathias Glaus & Norma Angélica Oropeza-García & Robert Hausler, 2015. "Sustainability Assessment of the Residential Land Use in Seven Boroughs of the Island of Montreal, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Qing Huang & Xinqi Zheng & Yecui Hu, 2015. "Analysis of Land-Use Emergy Indicators Based on Urban Metabolism: A Case Study for Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Ricardo Enrique Vega-Azamar & Rabindranarth Romero-López & Norma Angélica Oropeza-García & Mathias Glaus & Robert Hausler & Herlinda Del Socorro Silva-Poot, 2017. "Emergy Evaluation of Dwelling Operation in Five Housing Units of Montreal Island, Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Chang Liu & Xueyi Shi & Lulu Qu & Bingyi Li, 2016. "Comparative Analysis for the Urban Metabolic Differences of Two Types of Cities in the Resource-Dependent Region Based on Emergy Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-11, July.
    7. Thomas Elliot & Javier Babí Almenar & Samuel Niza & Vânia Proença & Benedetto Rugani, 2019. "Pathways to Modelling Ecosystem Services within an Urban Metabolism Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Qu, Lili & Zhang, Tianzhu & Liang, Sai, 2013. "Waste management of urban agglomeration on a life cycle basis," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 47-53.
    9. Li, Wenjia & Hao, Yong & Wang, Hongsheng & Liu, Hao & Sui, Jun, 2017. "Efficient and low-carbon heat and power cogeneration with photovoltaics and thermochemical storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1523-1531.
    10. Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L. & Arabatzis, Garyfallos & Tsialis, Panagiotis & Ioannou, Konstantinos, 2018. "Electricity consumption and RES plants in Greece: Typologies of regional units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 134-144.
    11. Piotr Siemiątkowski & Patryk Tomaszewski & Joanna Marszałek-Kawa & Janusz Gierszewski, 2020. "The Financing of Renewable Energy Sources and the Level of Sustainable Development of Poland’s Provinces in the Area of Environmental Order," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    12. Østergaard, P.A. & Lund, H. & Thellufsen, J.Z. & Sorknæs, P. & Mathiesen, B.V., 2022. "Review and validation of EnergyPLAN," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    13. Bhagaban Behera, 2013. "Drug Trafficking as a Non-Traditional Security Threat to Central Asian States," Jadavpur Journal of International Relations, , vol. 17(2), pages 229-251, December.
    14. Sun, Lu & Liu, Wenjing & Li, Zhaoling & Cai, Bofeng & Fujii, Minoru & Luo, Xiao & Chen, Wei & Geng, Yong & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Le, Yiping, 2021. "Spatial and structural characteristics of CO2 emissions in East Asian megacities and its indication for low-carbon city development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    15. Keun-Seob Choi & Jeong-Dong Lee & Chulwoo Baek, 2016. "Growth of De Alio and De Novo firms in the new and renewable energy industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 295-312, May.
    16. Göransson, Lisa & Goop, Joel & Unger, Thomas & Odenberger, Mikael & Johnsson, Filip, 2014. "Linkages between demand-side management and congestion in the European electricity transmission system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 860-872.
    17. Tomasz Jałowiec & Henryk Wojtaszek, 2021. "Analysis of the RES Potential in Accordance with the Energy Policy of the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-33, September.
    18. Tomislav Malvić & Uroš Barudžija & Borivoje Pašić & Josip Ivšinović, 2021. "Small Unconventional Hydrocarbon Gas Reservoirs as Challenging Energy Sources, Case Study from Northern Croatia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Geraili, A. & Sharma, P. & Romagnoli, J.A., 2014. "Technology analysis of integrated biorefineries through process simulation and hybrid optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 145-159.
    20. Wu, Yongjiao & Dong, Suocheng & Huang, Haosheng & Zhai, Jun & Li, Yu & Huang, Dingxuan, 2018. "Quantifying urban land expansion dynamics through improved land management institution model: Application in Ningxia-Inner Mongolia, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 386-396.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:153-:d:88352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.