IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i10p1890-d115819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Sustainability Risk Evaluation of PPP Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Libiao Bai

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Middle Section of South Second Ring Road, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yi Li

    (School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Middle Section of South Second Ring Road, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Qiang Du

    (School of Economics and Management, Chang’an University, Middle Section of South Second Ring Road, Xi’an 710064, China)

  • Yadan Xu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Middle Section of South Second Ring Road, Xi’an 710064, China)

Abstract

Evaluating the sustainability risk level of public–private partnership (PPP) projects can reduce project risk incidents and achieve the sustainable development of the organization. However, the existing studies about PPP projects risk management mainly focus on exploring the impact of financial and revenue risks but ignore the sustainability risks, causing the concept of “sustainability” to be missing while evaluating the risk level of PPP projects. To evaluate the sustainability risk level and achieve the most important objective of providing a reference for the public and private sectors when making decisions on PPP project management, this paper constructs a factor system of sustainability risk of PPP projects based on an extensive literature review and develops a mathematical model based on the methods of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model (FCEM) and failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) for evaluating the sustainability risk level of PPP projects. In addition, this paper conducts computational experiment based on a questionnaire survey to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of this proposed model. The results suggest that this model is reasonable for evaluating the sustainability risk level of PPP projects. To our knowledge, this paper is the first study to evaluate the sustainability risk of PPP projects, which would not only enrich the theories of project risk management, but also serve as a reference for the public and private sectors for the sustainable planning and development. Keywords: sustainability risk eva

Suggested Citation

  • Libiao Bai & Yi Li & Qiang Du & Yadan Xu, 2017. "A Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Model for Sustainability Risk Evaluation of PPP Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1890-:d:115819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1890/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/10/1890/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Ping Tserng, H. & Lin, Chieh & Yeh, Chun-Pin, 2012. "Critical factors and risk allocation for PPP policy: Comparison between HSR and general infrastructure projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 36-48.
    2. Nigel D. Caldwell & Jens K. Roehrich & Gerard George, 2017. "Social Value Creation and Relational Coordination in Public-Private Collaborations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 906-928, September.
    3. Jingfeng Yuan & Alex Yajun Zeng & Miroslaw Skibniewski & Qiming Li, 2009. "Selection of performance objectives and key performance indicators in public-private partnership projects to achieve value for money," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 253-270.
    4. Xiao-Hua Jin & Hemanta Doloi, 2008. "Interpreting risk allocation mechanism in public-private partnership projects: an empirical study in a transaction cost economics perspective," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 707-721.
    5. Xu, Yelin & Chan, Albert P.C. & Xia, Bo & Qian, Queena K. & Liu, Yong & Peng, Yi, 2015. "Critical risk factors affecting the implementation of PPP waste-to-energy projects in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 403-411.
    6. Li Gong & Chunling Jin, 2009. "Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation for Carrying Capacity of Regional Water Resources," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(12), pages 2505-2513, September.
    7. Jicai Liu & Charles Cheah, 2009. "Real option application in PPP/PFI project negotiation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 331-342.
    8. Kent Buse & Andrew Harmer, 2004. "Power to the Partners?: The politics of public-private health partnerships," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 47(2), pages 49-56, June.
    9. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    10. Athena Roumboutsos & Konstantinos Anagnostopoulos, 2008. "Public-private partnership projects in Greece: risk ranking and preferred risk allocation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 751-763.
    11. Shiying Shi & Heap-Yih Chong & Lihong Liu & Xiaosu Ye, 2016. "Examining the Interrelationship among Critical Success Factors of Public Private Partnership Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-20, December.
    12. Pär Sjölander, 2007. "Unreal exchange rates: a simulation‐based approach to adjust misleading PPP estimates," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(3), pages 256-288, August.
    13. Liyin Shen & Vivian W.Y. Tam & Lin Gan & Kunhui Ye & Zongnan Zhao, 2016. "Improving Sustainability Performance for Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Libiao Bai & Hailing Wang & Ning Huang & Qiang Du & Youdan Huang, 2018. "An Environmental Management Maturity Model of Construction Programs Using the AHP-Entropy Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Guoqing Zhao & Shaofeng Liu & Carmen Lopez & Yi Wang & Haiyan Lu & Jinhua Zhang, 2024. "Identification, establishment of connection, and clustering of social risks involved in the agri-food supply chains: a cross-country comparative study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 338(2), pages 1241-1282, July.
    3. Wu, Yunna & Song, Zixin & Li, Lingwenying & Xu, Ruhang, 2018. "Risk management of public-private partnership charging infrastructure projects in China based on a three-dimension framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 1089-1101.
    4. Yuanli Li & Pengcheng Xiang & Kairui You & Jin Guo & Zhaowen Liu & Hong Ren, 2021. "Identifying the Key Risk Factors of Mega Infrastructure Projects from an Extended Sustainable Development Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-29, July.
    5. Xiaoyan Jiang & Kun Lu & Bo Xia & Yong Liu & Caiyun Cui, 2019. "Identifying Significant Risks and Analyzing Risk Relationship for Construction PPP Projects in China Using Integrated FISM-MICMAC Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-31, September.
    6. Xueguo Xu & Tingting Xu & Meizeng Gui, 2020. "Incentive Mechanism for Municipal Solid Waste Disposal PPP Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Patrick Bergmann & Endre Kamarás & Werner Gleißner & Edeltraud Guenther, 2020. "Enhanced Cash Flow Valuation in Real Estate Management by Integrating Innovative Materials and Risk Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Oppio, Alessandra & Dell’Ovo, Marta & Torrieri, Francesca & Miebs, Grzegorz & Kadziński, Miłosz, 2020. "Understanding the drivers of Urban Development Agreements with the rough set approach and robust decision rules," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    9. Violeta Dimić & Mimica Milošević & Dušan Milošević & Dragan Stević, 2018. "Adjustable Model of Renewable Energy Projects for Sustainable Development: A Case Study of the Nišava District in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Yan Wang & Yujie Wang & Xiuyu Wu & Jiwang Li, 2020. "Exploring the Risk Factors of Infrastructure PPP Projects for Sustainable Delivery: A Social Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilal Anwar & Zhongdong Xiao & Sharmin Akter & Ramiz-Ur Rehman, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization and Development Goals Strategy through Public–Private Partnerships in a South-Asian Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Guoxian Cao & Chaoyang Guo & Hezhong Li, 2022. "Risk Analysis of Public–Private Partnership Waste-to-Energy Incineration Projects from the Perspective of Rural Revitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Cheng Chen & Dan Li & Caixia Man, 2018. "Toward Sustainable Development? A Bibliometric Analysis of PPP-Related Policies in China between 1980 and 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Cao, Fuguo & Li, Runyu & Guo, Shaobo, 2024. "Rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships in China: A sustainable public procurement perspective," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Han, Qingye & Zhu, Yuming & Ke, Ginger Y. & Hipel, Keith W., 2019. "Public private partnership in brownfield remediation projects in China: Identification and structure analysis of risks," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 87-104.
    7. Wu, Yunna & Song, Zixin & Li, Lingwenying & Xu, Ruhang, 2018. "Risk management of public-private partnership charging infrastructure projects in China based on a three-dimension framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 1089-1101.
    8. Gordon Dugle & Stephen Debar Kpinpuo & Benjamin Baisie Ghartey, 2021. "From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public‐private partnership in Ghana," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 866-884, May.
    9. Abraham Park & Chen Yu Chang, 2013. "Impacts of Construction Events on the Project Equity Value of the Channel Tunnel Project," ERES eres2013_97, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    10. Mohammed Khaled Al-Hanawi & Sarh Almubark & Ameerah M N Qattan & Agnieszka Cenkier & Ewa Agnieszka Kosycarz, 2020. "Barriers to the implementation of public-private partnerships in the healthcare sector in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Nannan Wang & Minxun Ma, 2021. "Public–private partnership as a tool for sustainable development – What literatures say?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 243-258, January.
    12. Palaco, Ileana & Park, Min Jae & Kim, Suk Kyoung & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2019. "Public–private partnerships for e-government in developing countries: An early stage assessment framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 205-218.
    13. Yan Wang & Yujie Wang & Xiuyu Wu & Jiwang Li, 2020. "Exploring the Risk Factors of Infrastructure PPP Projects for Sustainable Delivery: A Social Network Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2020. "A Dynamic Model for the Financial Sustainability of the Restoration Sponsorship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Tajani, Francesco & Morano, Pierluigi & Di Liddo, Felicia, 2020. "The optimal combinations of the eligible functions in multiple property assets enhancement," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Kopańska, Agnieszka & Osinski, Roman & Korbus, Bartosz, 2024. "Private entities motivations to participate in public-private partnerships," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Fleta-Asín, Jorge & Muñoz, Fernando, 2020. "How does risk transference to private partner impact on public-private partnerships’ success? Empirical evidence from developing economies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    18. Binchao Deng & Dongjie Zhou & Jiachen Zhao & Yilin Yin & Xiaoyu Li, 2021. "Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of the Critical Success Factors for the Sustainability of Public Private Partnership Projects in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Gerard George & Sankalp Chaturvedi & Christopher Corbishley & Rifat Atun, 2024. "Relational Co‐ordination and Stigma at Work: How Frontline Employees Compensate for Failures in Public Health Systems," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 752-784, May.
    20. Pascual Berrone & Joan Enric Ricart & Ana Isabel Duch & Valeria Bernardo & Jordi Salvador & Juan Piedra Peña & Miquel Rodríguez Planas, 2019. "EASIER: An Evaluation Model for Public–Private Partnerships Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:10:p:1890-:d:115819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.