IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p268-d65781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Investment in Renovation to Increase the Quality of Buildings: A Specific Discounted Cash Flow ( DCF ) Approach of Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Bonazzi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Environment, Territory and Architecture (DICATeA), University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy)

  • Mattia Iotti

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Environment, Territory and Architecture (DICATeA), University of Parma, 43124 Parma, Italy)

Abstract

The objective of this article is to develop and apply a specific discounting cash flow ( DCF ) approach to evaluate investment in renovation to improve building quality, thus increasing energy efficiency. In this article, we develop and apply a specific net present value (NPV) and an internal rate of return (IRR) approach to quantify the value created for the owners of the building by the investment in renovation via energy-saving investments that produce positive externalities. The model has an applied interest because, in recent years, a lot of investments in real estate were made by owners in order to increase the green quality of the buildings, and several funds of public aid were provided by the government to stimulate these energy-saving investments. The model proposed here is applied to a case study of a 16-apartment building located in northern Italy considers the model attempts to quantify the initial investment value, the energy savings, the tax deduction of the initial investment and the terminal value of the investment as the increase in building value. The analysis shows that the model is consistent in evaluating investments to improve building quality, and investments within the context of the specific case study considered in the research have IRRs ranging from a minimum of 4.907% to a maximum of 12.980%. It could even be useful to consider a sample of cases to verify whether our results are representative of this specific case study. The model could represent a useful tool for consumers in evaluating their own investments in building renovation, from a stand-alone perspective and even by comparing them with other types of investment. The research could be developed in the future to quantify the social welfare generated by public spending via tax deductions to reduce the costs of investment in energy savings for buildings and could even be applied to new real estate projects in comparing different construction technologies and even comparing the return of renovation investment with other investments not even in the real estate sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Bonazzi & Mattia Iotti, 2016. "Evaluation of Investment in Renovation to Increase the Quality of Buildings: A Specific Discounted Cash Flow ( DCF ) Approach of Appraisal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:268-:d:65781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/268/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/268/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tudisca, Salvatore & Di Trapani, Anna Maria & Sgroi, Filippo & Testa, Riccardo & Squatrito, Riccardo, 2013. "Economic analysis of PV systems on buildings in Sicilian farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 691-701.
    2. Timmons, David, 2014. "Using Former Farmland for Biomass Crops: Massachusetts Landowner Motivations and Willingness to Plant," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    3. Dean Altshuler & Carlo Alberto Magni, 2012. "Why IRR is Not the Rate of Return for Your Investment: Introducing AIRR to the Real Estate Community," Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 219-230, January.
    4. Caggese, Andrea, 2007. "Testing financing constraints on firm investment using variable capital," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(3), pages 683-723, December.
    5. Bagella, M. & Becchetti, L. & Caggese, A., 2001. "Financial constraints on investments: A three-pillar approach," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 219-254, June.
    6. Timmons, David, 2014. "Using Former Farmland for Biomass Crops: Massachusetts Landowner Motivations and Willingness to Plant," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 43(3), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Timmons, David, 2014. "Using Former Farmland for Biomass Crops: Massachusetts Landowner Motivations and Willingness to Plant," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 419-437, December.
    8. Ean-Harn Ng & Mario G. Beruvides, 2015. "Multiple Internal Rate of Return Revisited: Frequency of Occurrences," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 75-87, January.
    9. Carlo Magni, 2013. "The Internal Rate of Return Approach and the AIRR Paradigm: A Refutation and a Corroboration," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(2), pages 73-111.
    10. Amstalden, Roger W. & Kost, Michael & Nathani, Carsten & Imboden, Dieter M., 2007. "Economic potential of energy-efficient retrofitting in the Swiss residential building sector: The effects of policy instruments and energy price expectations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1819-1829, March.
    11. Eric Korpi & Timo Ala-Risku, 2008. "Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 23(3), pages 240-261, March.
    12. Afshin Afshari & Christina Nikolopoulou & Miguel Martin, 2014. "Life-Cycle Analysis of Building Retrofits at the Urban Scale—A Case Study in United Arab Emirates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Carlo Alberto Magni, 2010. "Average internal rate of return and investment decisions: A new perspective," Proyecciones Financieras y Valoración 6653, Master Consultores.
    14. Filippo Sgroi & Matteo Candela & Anna Maria Di Trapani & Mario Foderà & Riccardo Squatrito & Riccardo Testa & Salvatore Tudisca, 2015. "Economic and Financial Comparison between Organic and Conventional Farming in Sicilian Lemon Orchards," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.
    15. Moshe Ben-Horin & Yoram Kroll, 2012. "The Limited Relevance of the Multiple s," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 101-118.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Maria Congedo & Delia D’Agostino & Cristina Baglivo & Giuliano Tornese & Ilaria Zacà, 2016. "Efficient Solutions and Cost-Optimal Analysis for Existing School Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Qu, Ke & Chen, Xiangjie & Wang, Yixin & Calautit, John & Riffat, Saffa & Cui, Xin, 2021. "Comprehensive energy, economic and thermal comfort assessments for the passive energy retrofit of historical buildings - A case study of a late nineteenth-century Victorian house renovation in the UK," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    3. Faustino Patiño-Cambeiro & Julia Armesto & Faustino Patiño-Barbeito & Guillermo Bastos, 2016. "Perspectives on Near ZEB Renovation Projects for Residential Buildings: The Spanish Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mattia Iotti & Giuseppe Bonazzi, 2016. "Assessment of Biogas Plant Firms by Application of Annual Accounts and Financial Data Analysis Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Vicente Alcaraz Carrillo De Albornoz & Antonio Lara Galera & Juan Molina Millán, 2018. "Is It Correct to Use the Internal Rate of Return to Evaluate the Sustainability of Investment Decisions in Public Private Partnership Projects?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 54-79.
    4. Dean Altshuler & Carlo Alberto Magni, 2015. "Introducing Aggregate Return on Investment as a Solution to the Contradiction Between Some PME Metrics and IRR," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 15209, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    5. Ben-Horin, Moshe & Kroll, Yoram, 2017. "A simple intuitive NPV-IRR consistent ranking," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 108-114.
    6. Lal, Pankaj & Wolde, Bernabas & Alavalapati, Janaki & Burli, Pralhad & Munsell, John, 2016. "Forestland owners' willingness to plant pine on non-forested land for woody bioenergy in Virginia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 52-57.
    7. Mutandwa, Edward & Grala, Robert K. & Petrolia, Daniel R., 2019. "Estimates of willingness to accept compensation to manage pine stands for ecosystem services," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 75-85.
    8. Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2015. "Investment, financing and the role of ROA and WACC in value creation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 855-866.
    9. Cuthbert, James R. & Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2016. "Measuring the inadequacy of IRR in PFI schemes using profitability index and AIRR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 130-140.
    10. Marchioni, Andrea & Magni, Carlo Alberto, 2018. "Investment decisions and sensitivity analysis: NPV-consistency of rates of return," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 361-372.
    11. Magni, Carlo Alberto & Marchioni, Andrea, 2020. "Average rates of return, working capital, and NPV-consistency in project appraisal: A sensitivity analysis approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    12. Juan Torres & Diego L. Valera & Luis J. Belmonte & Carlos Herrero-Sánchez, 2016. "Economic and Social Sustainability through Organic Agriculture: Study of the Restructuring of the Citrus Sector in the “ Bajo Andarax ” District (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Carlo Alberto Magni & Ken V. Peasnell, 2015. "The Term Structure of Capital Values:An accounting-based framework for measuring economic profitability," Department of Economics 0060, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    14. Alexandr V. Zhevnyak, . "Reference," NEW CONCEPT OF RETURN ON BORROWED AND INVESTMENT PROJECTS,, Socionet.
    15. Andrea Marchioni & Carlo Alberto Magni & Davide Baschieri, 2020. "Investment and Financing Perspectives for a Solar Photovoltaic Project," MIC 2020: The 20th Management International Conference,, University of Primorska Press.
    16. Dean Altshuler & Carlo Alberto Magni, 2015. "Introducing Aggregate Return on Investment as a Solution to the Contradiction Between Some PME Metrics and IRR," Centro Studi di Banca e Finanza (CEFIN) (Center for Studies in Banking and Finance) 0056, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    17. Quan Dai & Hongfei Jia & Yao Liu, 2020. "Private vehicle-based crowdshipping for intercity express transportation: Feasibility assessment," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(2), pages 15501477209, February.
    18. Andrea Marchiioni & Carlo Alberto Magni, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis and investment decisions: NPV-consistency of rates of return," Department of Economics 0089, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    19. Becchetti, Leonardo & Castelli, Annalisa & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2008. "Investment-cash flow sensitivities, credit rationing and financing constraints," Research Discussion Papers 15/2008, Bank of Finland.
    20. Simona Hašková & Petr Fiala, 2023. "Internal Rate of Return Estimation of Subsidised Projects: Conventional Approach Versus fuzzy Approach," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(3), pages 1233-1249, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:268-:d:65781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.