IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i11p1111-d81750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Questionnaire Case Study to Investigate Public Awareness of Smog Pollution in China’s Rural Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Li Jiang

    (Faculty of Marxism, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
    Environmental Management Research Group, Vaasa University, Vaasa FI-65101, Finland)

  • Erkki Hiltunen

    (Environmental Management Research Group, Vaasa University, Vaasa FI-65101, Finland)

  • Xianglin He

    (Institute for Advanced Humanistic Studies, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Liandong Zhu

    (Vaasa Energy Institute, FI-65101 Vaasa, Finland)

Abstract

Smog pollution is one of China’s most pressing public health issues today and has therefore received significant attention worldwide. Not only cities but also villages in China are suffering from smog pollution, especially since 2013. However, there is limited information available about public awareness on smog pollution in China, especially for where it concerns the residents living in villages. Based on a questionnaire survey, this study aims to help fill this gap. The results of the study show that the income of the majority of respondents comes from working in the city, accounting for 31.6% of the total income. The percentages for respondents related to access to smog information from various channels are as follows: TV (28.5%), radio (24.2%), neighbors (13.5%), Internet (9.8%), newspapers (8.3%) and others (7.8%). As for attitudes regarding the severity degree and main cause of smog pollution, most respondents (33.7%) thought smog pollution in villages was somewhat severe, while 26.3% agreed that the main contributor to smog pollution was industrial emissions, followed by coal burning at power plants (20.9%) and vehicle emissions (17.7%). The results also indicate that most of the respondents were satisfied with the government’s performance in terms of smog control. However, 67.9% of respondents indicated they would remain silent and not intervene when confronted by an activity that causes smog pollution. This study can help to improve an understanding of public awareness regarding smog pollution in China’s rural areas and thereby activate positive public participation in smog pollution prevention and management in the search for sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Jiang & Erkki Hiltunen & Xianglin He & Liandong Zhu, 2016. "A Questionnaire Case Study to Investigate Public Awareness of Smog Pollution in China’s Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-10, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1111-:d:81750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cuiping Xu & H. Holly Wang & Qinghua Shi, 2012. "Farmers’ Income and Production Responses to Rural Taxation Reform in Three Regions in China," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 291-309, June.
    2. GOLLEY, Jane & WEI, Zheng, 2015. "Population dynamics and economic growth in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 15-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xun Gong & Shenggang Yang & Min Zhang, 2017. "Not Only Health: Environmental Pollution Disasters and Political Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Lingyi Zhou & Yixin Dai, 2017. "How Smog Awareness Influences Public Acceptance of Congestion Charge Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Tong Zhang & Chaofan Chen, 2018. "The Effect of Public Participation on Environmental Governance in China–Based on the Analysis of Pollutants Emissions Employing a Provincial Quantification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Yan Wu & Pim Martens & Thomas Krafft, 2022. "Public Awareness, Lifestyle and Low-Carbon City Transformation in China: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Wang, Lingling & Watanabe, Tsunemi, 2019. "Effects of environmental policy on public risk perceptions of haze in Tianjin City: A difference-in-differences analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 199-212.
    6. Frederick Qiu & Ethan Wang & Matthew Fan & Hong Liao & Litao Wang & Zuyi Huang, 2018. "A Questionnaire Case Study of Chinese Opinions on the Haze Pollution and Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-30, June.
    7. Xinghua Liu & Qian Ye & Ye Li & Jing Fan & Yue Tao, 2021. "Examining Public Concerns and Attitudes toward Unfair Events Involving Elderly Travelers during the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Weibo Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Kaixing & Yan, Wenshou & Huang, Jikun, 2020. "Agricultural subsidies retard urbanisation in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(04), January.
    2. Feike, Til & Henseler, Martin, 2017. "Multiple Policy Instruments for Sustainable Water Management in Crop Production - A Modeling Study for the Chinese Aksu-Tarim Region," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 42-54.
    3. Jing Zhu & Wusheng Yu & Junying Wang & Christian Elleby, 2016. "Tariff Liberalisation, Price Transmission and Rural Welfare in China," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 24-46, February.
    4. Valerio Mendoza, Octasiano Miguel & Borsi, Mihály Tamás & Comim, Flavio, 2022. "Human capital dynamics in China: Evidence from a club convergence approach," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Wenjun Jiao & Anthony M. Fuller & Siyuan Xu & Qingwen Min & Minfang Wu, 2016. "Socio-Ecological Adaptation of Agricultural Heritage Systems in Modern China: Three Cases in Qingtian County, Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Yimin Chen & Yulin Liu & Xin Fang, 2021. "The new evidence of China’s economic downturn: From structural bonus to structural imbalance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Patrick S. Ward & Gerald E. Shively, 2015. "Migration and Land Rental as Responses to Income Shocks in Rural China," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 511-543, October.
    8. Dmitriy Izotov, 2017. "Urban Economic Growth in the Chinese Heterogeneity Space," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 789-802.
    9. Genjin Sun & Yanxiu Liu & Yurong Zhu, 2024. "Target price policy and rural household income: Evidence from China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(5), pages 226-243.
    10. Yi, Fujin & Sun, Dingqiang, 2014. "Grain Subsidy, Liquidity Constraints and Food security—Impact of the Grain Subsidy Program on the Grain-Sown Areas in China," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169779, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Lu Sun & Christian Fertner & Gertrud Jørgensen, 2021. "Beijing’s First Green Belt—A 50-Year Long Chinese Planning Story," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Hongyun Zheng & Wanglin Ma, 2021. "The role of resource reallocation in promoting total factor productivity growth: Insights from China’s agricultural sector," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 2350-2371, November.
    13. Tian, Qing & Holland, John H. & Brown, Daniel G., 2016. "Social and economic impacts of subsidy policies on rural development in the Poyang Lake Region, China: Insights from an agent-based model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 12-27.
    14. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Min Zhang, 2019. "Government institutions and the dynamics of urban growth in China," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(4), pages 633-668, September.
    15. Duyen Dang Thi Thuy, 2023. "Energy and Agricultural Development in the Red River Delta Provinces, Vietnam," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(4), pages 216-224, July.
    16. Conglong Fang & Qingen Gai & Chaofei He & Qinghua Shi, 2020. "The Experience of Poverty Reduction in Rural China," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    17. Ryan, M. & O'Donoghue, C., 2018. "The Importance of Fiscal measures in Financial Incentives for Land Use Decisions," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277408, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Yi, Fujin & Sun, Dingqiang & Zhou, Yingheng, 2015. "Grain subsidy, liquidity constraints and food security—Impact of the grain subsidy program on the grain-sown areas in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 114-124.
    19. Yuanying Chi & Yangmei Xu & Xu Wang & Feng Jin & Jialin Li, 2021. "A Win–Win Scenario for Agricultural Green Development and Farmers’ Agricultural Income: An Empirical Analysis Based on the EKC Hypothesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Yi, Fujin & Lu, Wuyi & Zhou, Yingheng, 2015. "Cash Transfers and Multiplier Effect: Lessons from the Grain Subsidy Program in China," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211877, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1111-:d:81750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.