IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i11p1095-d81381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Human Factors in Green Office Building Design: The Impact of Workplace Green Features on Health Perceptions in High-Rise High-Density Asian Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Xue

    (School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd., Singapore 117566, Singapore)

  • Zhonghua Gou

    (Cities Research Centre, School of Environment, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD 4215, Australia)

  • Stephen Siu Yu Lau

    (School of Design and Environment, National University of Singapore, 21 Lower Kent Ridge Rd., Singapore 117566, Singapore)

Abstract

There is a growing concern about human factors in green building, which is imperative in high-rise high-density urban environments. This paper describes our attempts to explore the influence of workplace green features (such as green certification, ventilation mode, and building morphology) on health perceptions (personal sensation, sensorial assumptions, healing performance) based on a survey in Hong Kong and Singapore. The results validated the relationship between green features and health perceptions in the workplace environment. Remarkably, participants from the air-conditioned offices revealed significant higher concerns about health issues than those participants from the mixed-ventilated offices. The mixed-ventilation design performs as a bridge to connect the indoor environment and outdoor space, which enables people to have contact with nature. Additionally, the preferred building morphology of the workplace is the pattern of a building complex instead of a single building. The complex form integrates the configuration of courtyards, podium gardens, green terrace, public plaza, and other types of open spaces with the building clusters, which contributes to better health perceptions. This research contributes to the rationalization and optimization of passive climate-adaptive design strategies for green buildings in high-density tropical or subtropical cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Xue & Zhonghua Gou & Stephen Siu Yu Lau, 2016. "Human Factors in Green Office Building Design: The Impact of Workplace Green Features on Health Perceptions in High-Rise High-Density Asian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1095-:d:81381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/11/1095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hraska, Jozef, 2015. "Chronobiological aspects of green buildings daylighting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 109-114.
    2. Sally S. Shahzad & John Brennan & Dimitris Theodossopoulos & Ben Hughes & John Kaiser Calautit, 2016. "Building-Related Symptoms, Energy, and Thermal Control in the Workplace: Personal and Open Plan Offices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Chan, Kwok Bun & Lai, Gina & Ko, Yiu Chung & Boey, Kam Weng, 2000. "Work stress among six professional groups: the Singapore experience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 1415-1432, May.
    4. Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R., 2003. "Health, Supportive Environments, and the Reasonable Person Model," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1484-1489.
    5. Hugh Byrd & Eziaku Onyeizu Rasheed, 2016. "The Productivity Paradox in Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lihua Liang & Baohua Wen & Feng Xu & Jianwei Yan & Xiangqi Yan & S. Ramesh, 2021. "Linking the Development of Building Sustainability Assessment Tools with the Concept Evolution of Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Tajda Potrč Obrecht & Roman Kunič & Sabina Jordan & Mateja Dovjak, 2019. "Comparison of Health and Well-Being Aspects in Building Certification Schemes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    3. Albert Ping Chuen Chan & Amos Darko & Ernest Effah Ameyaw, 2017. "Strategies for Promoting Green Building Technologies Adoption in the Construction Industry—An International Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Yuemei Zhu & Junxiang Ding & Qing Zhu & Yang Cheng & Qiuchen Ma & Xuze Ji, 2017. "The Impact of Green Open Space on Community Attachment—A Case Study of Three Communities in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Holle, Veerle & Van Cauwenberg, Jelle & Deforche, Benedicte & Goubert, Liesbet & Maes, Lea & Nasar, Jack & Van de Weghe, Nico & Salmon, Jo & De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse, 2014. "Environmental invitingness for transport-related cycling in middle-aged adults: A proof of concept study using photographs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 432-446.
    2. Meryem Hayir-Kanat & Jürgen Breuste, 2019. "Which Natural Areas are Preferred for Recreation? An Investigation of the Most Popular Natural Resting Types for Istanbul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Ghosh, A. & Mallick, T.K., 2018. "Evaluation of colour properties due to switching behaviour of a PDLC glazing for adaptive building integration," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 126-133.
    4. Jun-Hyun Kim & Chanam Lee & Wonmin Sohn, 2016. "Urban Natural Environments, Obesity, and Health-Related Quality of Life among Hispanic Children Living in Inner-City Neighborhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Macdonald, Elizabeth & Harper, Alethea & Williams, Jeff & Hayter, Jason A., 2006. "Street Trees and Intersection Safety," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4sk6m275, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Erica Neri & Federica Genova & Marcello Stella & Alessandra Provera & Augusto Biasini & Francesca Agostini, 2022. "Parental Distress and Affective Perception of Hospital Environment after a Pictorial Intervention in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Kalmár, Tünde & Szodrai, Ferenc & Kalmár, Ferenc, 2022. "Experimental study of local effectiveness in the case of balanced mechanical ventilation in small offices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    8. Meryem Hayir-Kanat & Jürgen Breuste, 2020. "Outdoor Recreation Participation in Istanbul, Turkey: An Investigation of Frequency, Length, Travel Time and Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Shilei Lu & Minchao Fan & Yiqun Zhao, 2018. "A System to Pre-Evaluate the Suitability of Energy-Saving Technology for Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    10. C. Sathya Kumar, 2011. "Job Stress and Job Satisfaction of IT Companies' Employees," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 36(1), pages 61-72, February.
    11. Li, Guiqiang & Xuan, Qingdong & Akram, M.W. & Golizadeh Akhlaghi, Yousef & Liu, Haowen & Shittu, Samson, 2020. "Building integrated solar concentrating systems: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    12. Biggar, Matt & Ardoin, Nicole M., 2017. "Community context, human needs, and transportation choices: A view across San Francisco Bay Area communities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 189-199.
    13. Katherine N. Irvine & Sara L. Warber & Patrick Devine-Wright & Kevin J. Gaston, 2013. "Understanding Urban Green Space as a Health Resource: A Qualitative Comparison of Visit Motivation and Derived Effects among Park Users in Sheffield, UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, January.
    14. Ching-Cheng Shen & Dan Wang, 2023. "Using the RPM Model to Explore the Impact of Organic Agritourism Destination Fascination on Loyalty—The Mediating Roles of Place Attachment and Pro-Environmental Behavior," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Leonidas Bourikas & Stephanie Gauthier & Nicholas Khor Song En & Peiyao Xiong, 2021. "Effect of Thermal, Acoustic and Air Quality Perception Interactions on the Comfort and Satisfaction of People in Office Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
    16. Shahzad, Sally & Calautit, John Kaiser & Aquino, Angelo I. & Nasir, Diana S.N.M. & Hughes, Ben Richard, 2017. "A user-controlled thermal chair for an open plan workplace: CFD and field studies of thermal comfort performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 283-293.
    17. Zhang, Fan & de Dear, Richard & Hancock, Peter, 2019. "Effects of moderate thermal environments on cognitive performance: A multidisciplinary review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 760-777.
    18. Olivia James & Paul Delfabbro & Daniel L. King, 2021. "A Comparison of Psychological and Work Outcomes in Open-Plan and Cellular Office Designs: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    19. Nasrollahi, Nazanin & Shokri, Elham, 2016. "Daylight illuminance in urban environments for visual comfort and energy performance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 861-874.
    20. Agne Prochorskaite & Chris Couch & Naglis Malys & Vida Maliene, 2016. "Housing Stakeholder Preferences for the “Soft” Features of Sustainable and Healthy Housing Design in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:11:p:1095-:d:81381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.