IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i1p2158244020988869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Psychological and Work Outcomes in Open-Plan and Cellular Office Designs: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia James
  • Paul Delfabbro
  • Daniel L. King

Abstract

A high percentage of information-based work is now conducted in open-plan offices as opposed to traditional cellular offices. In this systematic review, we compare health, work, and social outcomes as well as employee outcomes for workers in the two environments. From a total of 10,242 papers reviewed, we identified 31 papers which met strict inclusion/exclusion criteria of allowing a direct comparison between the office types. The results showed that working in open-plan workplace designs is associated with more negative outcomes on many measures relating to health, satisfaction, productivity, and social relationship. Notable health outcomes included decreased overall health and increased stress. Environmental characteristics of particular concern included noise and distractions, poor privacy, lighting and glare, and poorer temperature control. Most studies indicated negative effects on social relationships and interactions. Overall, the findings showed that while open-plan workplace designs may offer financial benefits for management, these appear to be offset by the intangible costs associated with the negative effects on workers. The study encourages further focused investigations into design factors as well as employee characteristics that might contribute to better outcomes in open-plan designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia James & Paul Delfabbro & Daniel L. King, 2021. "A Comparison of Psychological and Work Outcomes in Open-Plan and Cellular Office Designs: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244020988869
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020988869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020988869
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020988869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Bonetta, 2003. "Do you want to work here?," Nature, Nature, vol. 424(6950), pages 718-720, August.
    2. Sally S. Shahzad & John Brennan & Dimitris Theodossopoulos & Ben Hughes & John Kaiser Calautit, 2016. "Building-Related Symptoms, Energy, and Thermal Control in the Workplace: Personal and Open Plan Offices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfonso D. Gajardo Sánchez & Luis R. Murillo-Zamorano & Joséà ngel López-Sánchez & Carmen Bueno-Muñoz, 2023. "Gamification in Health Care Management: Systematic Review of the Literature and Research Agenda," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Christopher Ileanwa Abdul & Roshida Binti Abdul Majid & David B. Dalumo & Adejoh Andrew Ekule & Usman Abdulazeez Adeiza & Isah Obenege Suleiman & Idachaba Kareen Mamenoma, 2024. "An Investigation into the Impact of Orientation on the Thermal Performance and Occupant’s Productivity in Curtain Wall High-Rise Office Working Spaces During the Dry Season: A Case Study of Abuja, N," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 208-224, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalmár, Tünde & Szodrai, Ferenc & Kalmár, Ferenc, 2022. "Experimental study of local effectiveness in the case of balanced mechanical ventilation in small offices," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    2. Hiroko Nakaoka & Norimichi Suzuki & Akifumi Eguchi & Daisuke Matsuzawa & Chisato Mori, 2022. "Impact of Exposure to Indoor Air Chemicals on Health and the Progression of Building-Related Symptoms: A Case Report," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    3. Fei Xue & Zhonghua Gou & Stephen Siu Yu Lau, 2016. "Human Factors in Green Office Building Design: The Impact of Workplace Green Features on Health Perceptions in High-Rise High-Density Asian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Barbara Mayer & Michaela Killian & Martin Kozek, 2017. "Hierarchical Model Predictive Control for Sustainable Building Automation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Shahzad, Sally & Calautit, John Kaiser & Aquino, Angelo I. & Nasir, Diana S.N.M. & Hughes, Ben Richard, 2017. "A user-controlled thermal chair for an open plan workplace: CFD and field studies of thermal comfort performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 283-293.
    6. Paulina Wegertseder-Martínez, 2023. "The Need for a Paradigm Shift toward an Occupant-Centered Environmental Control Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Sergio Bustamante & Pablo Castro & Alberto Laso & Mario Manana & Alberto Arroyo, 2017. "Smart Thermostats: An Experimental Facility to Test Their Capabilities and Savings Potential," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-18, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:2158244020988869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.