IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i10p1013-d80238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Web-Based Tool for Climate Change Risk Assessment in the Business Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Donghyun Kim

    (Korea Environment Institute, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong 30147, Korea)

  • Junbeom Lee

    (Korea Environment Institute, 370 Sicheong-daero, Sejong 30147, Korea)

Abstract

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013 report claims that climate change from human-induced greenhouse gas emissions will cause increasing temperatures in many regions and various detrimental effects such as rising sea levels, ecosystem changes, droughts, and floods. This study proposes a method for assessing the climate risks resulting from climate change as well as a tool that companies can use to assess those risks. The method for assessing climate risk is proposed in accordance with the ISO 31000 risk management process. We then design a web-based tool to implement the climate change risk assessment process. The data the tool generates enable companies to identify and analyze their climate risks to reduce potentially negative future financial impacts. The data on potential damage costs indicate that climate change is no longer an environmental issue but rather an economic one for companies, and the results presented through the proposed assessment method can be used to establish countermeasures and sustainable planning at companies. The results of this research are significant in that they provide companies with the critical information needed to improve their planning and response to climate risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Donghyun Kim & Junbeom Lee, 2016. "Development of a Web-Based Tool for Climate Change Risk Assessment in the Business Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:1013-:d:80238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/10/1013/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/10/1013/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martina Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Peter Mumby, 2015. "Executives’ engagement with climate science and perceived need for business adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 321-333, July.
    2. Monika Winn & Manfred Kirchgeorg & Andrew Griffiths & Martina K. Linnenluecke & Elmar Günther, 2011. "Impacts from climate change on organizations: a conceptual foundation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 157-173, March.
    3. James M. Murphy & David M. H. Sexton & David N. Barnett & Gareth S. Jones & Mark J. Webb & Matthew Collins & David A. Stainforth, 2004. "Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations," Nature, Nature, vol. 430(7001), pages 768-772, August.
    4. A. Kay & H. Davies & V. Bell & R. Jones, 2009. "Comparison of uncertainty sources for climate change impacts: flood frequency in England," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 92(1), pages 41-63, January.
    5. Martina K. Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Monika Winn, 2012. "Extreme Weather Events and the Critical Importance of Anticipatory Adaptation and Organizational Resilience in Responding to Impacts," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 17-32, January.
    6. Averchenkova, Alina & Crick, Florence & Kocornik-Mina, Adriana & Leck, Hayley & Surminski, Swenja, 2016. "Multinational and large national corporations and climateadaptation: are we asking the right questions? A review ofcurrent knowledge and a new research perspective," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65562, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Swenja Surminski, 2013. "Private-sector adaptation to climate risk," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(11), pages 943-945, November.
    8. Elvira Böcskei & Veronika Fenyves & Emese Kinga Zsidó & Zoltán Bács, 2015. "Expected Risk Assessment—Annual Report versus Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jae Kyu Myung & Hyoung-Tae An & Su-Yol Lee, 2019. "Corporate Competitiveness Index of Climate Change: A Balanced Scorecard Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jennifer Steeves & Swenja Surminski, 2014. "Taking an organisational approach to private sector adaptation � the case of Tata Teleservices in India," GRI Working Papers 171, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    2. Alina Averchenkova & Florence Crick & Adriana Kocornik-Mina & Hayley Leck & Swenja Surminski, 2015. "Multinational corporations and climate adaptation – Are we asking the right questions? A review of current knowledge and a new research perspective," GRI Working Papers 183, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    3. Martina Linnenluecke & Andrew Griffiths & Peter Mumby, 2015. "Executives’ engagement with climate science and perceived need for business adaptation to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 321-333, July.
    4. Simon Gosling & Glenn McGregor & Jason Lowe, 2012. "The benefits of quantifying climate model uncertainty in climate change impacts assessment: an example with heat-related mortality change estimates," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 217-231, May.
    5. Mercedes Bleda & Elisabeth Krull & Jonatan Pinkse & Eleni Christodoulou, 2023. "Organizational heuristics and firms' sensemaking for climate change adaptation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6124-6137, December.
    6. Jorge Rivera & Viviane Clement, 2019. "Business adaptation to climate change: American ski resorts and warmer temperatures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1285-1301, November.
    7. George Halkos & Antonis Skouloudis & Chrisovaladis Malesios & Konstantinos Evangelinos, 2018. "Bouncing Back from Extreme Weather Events: Some Preliminary Findings on Resilience Barriers Facing Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 547-559, May.
    8. Thomas A. Tsalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2017. "Assessing the Effects of Climate Change Regulations on the Business Community: A System Dynamic Approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 826-843, September.
    9. Julia Hillmann, 2021. "Disciplines of organizational resilience: contributions, critiques, and future research avenues," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 879-936, May.
    10. Tiberio Daddi & Niccolò Maria Todaro & Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Marco Frey, 2018. "A Systematic Review of the Use of Organization and Management Theories in Climate Change Studies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 456-474, May.
    11. Jennifer DeBoer & Rajat Panwar & Jorge Rivera, 2017. "Toward A Place‐Based Understanding of Business Sustainability: The Role of Green Competitors and Green Locales in Firms' Voluntary Environmental Engagement," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(7), pages 940-955, November.
    12. Crick, Florence & Eskander, Shaikh M.S.U. & Fankhauser, Sam & Diop, Mamadou, 2018. "How do African SMEs respond to climate risks? Evidence from Kenya and Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 157-168.
    13. Josephine Bremer & Martina K. Linnenluecke, 2017. "Determinants of the perceived importance of organisational adaptation to climate change in the Australian energy industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(3), pages 502-521, August.
    14. Federica Gasbarro & Jonatan Pinkse, 2016. "Corporate Adaptation Behaviour to Deal With Climate Change: The Influence of Firm‐Specific Interpretations of Physical Climate Impacts," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(3), pages 179-192, May.
    15. Sooksan Kantabutra & Nuttasorn Ketprapakorn, 2024. "Understanding Resilience and Sustainability in Organizations: A Cutting-Edge Framework and the Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Ralph Ledbetter & Christel Prudhomme & Nigel Arnell, 2012. "A method for incorporating climate variability in climate change impact assessments: Sensitivity of river flows in the Eden catchment to precipitation scenarios," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 803-823, August.
    17. Niccolò Maria Todaro & Francesco Testa & Tiberio Daddi & Fabio Iraldo, 2021. "The influence of managers' awareness of climate change, perceived climate risk exposure and risk tolerance on the adoption of corporate responses to climate change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1232-1248, February.
    18. Kala Saravanamuthu, 2018. "How risk information and stakeholder‐participation affect the sustainability of collaborative decisions: A case study on how the sustainability of stakeholder decisions is affected by different levels," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1067-1078, November.
    19. Florence Crick & Mamadou Diop & Momadou Sow & Birame Diouf & Babacar Diouf & Joseph Muhwanga & Muna Dajani, 2016. "Enabling private sector adaptation in developing countries and their semi-arid regions – case studies of Senegal and Kenya," GRI Working Papers 258, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    20. Jeremy Galbreath, 2014. "Climate Change Response: Evidence from the Margaret River Wine Region of Australia," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 89-104, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:10:p:1013-:d:80238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.