IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v7y2015i7p8240-8254d51672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes of Citizens towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces for Urban Sustainability: The Case of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Young-Chang Lee

    (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea)

  • Keun-Ho Kim

    (Department of Forest Resources and Landscape Architecture, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehakro, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 712-749, Korea)

Abstract

Urban parks and green spaces support a wide array of species and play an important role in long-term sustainability. This study analyzed the needs and attitudes of citizens towards urban parks and green spaces in order to provide information for setting the future direction of urban sustainability to maximize quality of life. A questionnaire survey was conducted to analyze the general characteristics of respondents and their awareness of parks and spaces. First, the results indicate that the main purpose of visiting parks was relaxation and walking. Second, the type of parks visited most frequently by the respondents was pocket parks around home. Third, the main reason for going to the frequently visited parks was “close to home”. Fourth, the major reason for visiting parks infrequently was “improper park management”. Fifth, the desired types of urban parks were relaxation parks close to natural rivers. Sixth, citizens wanted to participate in the expansion projects of parks and green spaces through non-profit civic organizations or volunteer activities. Further research with a comparative analysis among different cities will be necessary to generalize Korean attitudes to urban parks and green spaces for urban sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Young-Chang Lee & Keun-Ho Kim, 2015. "Attitudes of Citizens towards Urban Parks and Green Spaces for Urban Sustainability: The Case of Gyeongsan City, Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:7:p:8240-8254:d:51672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/7/8240/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/7/8240/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 1992. "World Development Report 1992," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5975.
    2. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    3. Owens, Susan & Driffill, Louise, 2008. "How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4412-4418, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shabir Hussain Khahro & Mir Aftab Hussain Talpur & Musrat Gul Bhellar & Gopal Das & Haris Shaikh & Basel Sultan, 2023. "GIS-Based Sustainable Accessibility Mapping of Urban Parks: Evidence from the Second Largest Settlement of Sindh, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-27, April.
    2. Liqin Zhang & Huhua Cao & Ruibo Han, 2021. "Residents’ Preferences and Perceptions toward Green Open Spaces in an Urban Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Ramón Romance & Adriana Nielsen-Rodríguez & Javier Benítez-Porres & José Luis Chinchilla-Minguet & Honorato Morente-Oria, 2018. "Cognitive Effects and Educational Possibilities of Physical Activity in Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Pengwei Wang & Lirong Han & Rong Mei, 2022. "An Impact Asymmetry Analysis of Small Urban Green Space Attributes to Enhance Visitor Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Titus Bazac & Sorin Marin & Cosmin Olteanu & Anca Hotoi, 2023. "Sustainable Management Decisions for Urban Historical Parks: A Case Study Based on Online Referential Values of Carol I Park in Bucharest, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Kukulska-Kozieł, Anita & Noszczyk, Tomasz & Gorzelany, Julia & Młocek, Wojciech, 2024. "Greenery in times of crisis: Accessibility, residents' travel preferences and the impact of travel time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Kaiwen Su & Jie Ren & Chuyun Cui & Yilei Hou & Yali Wen, 2022. "Do Value Orientations and Beliefs Play a Positive Role in Shaping Personal Norms for Urban Green Space Conservation?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-15, February.
    8. Bingqin Yu & Shengquan Che & Changkun Xie & Shu Tian, 2018. "Understanding Shanghai Residents’ Perception of Leisure Impact and Experience Satisfaction of Urban Community Parks: An Integrated and IPA Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Adedotun Ayodele Dipeolu & Eziyi Offia Ibem & Joseph Akinlabi Fadamiro & Gabriel Fadairo, 2021. "Factors influencing residents’ attitude towards urban green infrastructure in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 6192-6214, April.
    10. Diana Andreea Onose & Ioan Cristian Iojă & Mihai Răzvan Niță & Gabriel Ovidiu Vânău & Ana Maria Popa, 2020. "Too Old for Recreation? How Friendly Are Urban Parks for Elderly People?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Anand & Prodyut Bhattacharya, 2023. "Urbanites’ perceptions of green spaces and their roles in effective management: a survey-based study from Delhi, India," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(1), pages 31-42, March.
    12. Agnieszka Mandziuk & Dagmara Stangierska & Beata Fornal-Pieniak & Jerzy Gębski & Barbara Żarska & Marta Kiraga, 2022. "Preferences of Young Adults concerning the Pocket Parks with Water Reservoirs in the Aspect of Willingness to Pay (WTP) in Warsaw City, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-13, April.
    13. Tomasz Bajwoluk & Piotr Langer, 2023. "The Pocket Park and Its Impact on the Quality of Urban Space on the Local and Supralocal Scale—Case Study of Krakow, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Elias Giannakis & Adriana Bruggeman & Dimitra Poulou & Christos Zoumides & Marinos Eliades, 2016. "Linear Parks along Urban Rivers: Perceptions of Thermal Comfort and Climate Change Adaptation in Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Seulkee Heo & Chris C. Lim & Michelle L. Bell, 2020. "Relationships between Local Green Space and Human Mobility Patterns during COVID-19 for Maryland and California, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-16, November.
    16. Ruixue Liu & Jing Xiao, 2020. "Factors Affecting Users’ Satisfaction with Urban Parks through Online Comments Data: Evidence from Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eskeland, Gunnar*Chingying Kong, 1998. "Protecting the environment and the poor - a public goods framework applied to Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1961, The World Bank.
    2. Ravnborg, Helle Munk, 2003. "Poverty and Environmental Degradation in the Nicaraguan Hillsides," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(11), pages 1933-1946, November.
    3. Mahapatr, Krushna & Kant, Shashi, 2005. "Tropical deforestation: a multinomial logistic model and some country-specific policy prescriptions," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(1), pages 1-24, January.
    4. Blackman, Allen & Mathis, Mitchell & Nelson, Peter, 2001. "The Greening of Development Economics: A Survey," Discussion Papers 10662, Resources for the Future.
    5. Pender, John L., 1998. "Population growth, agricultural intensification, induced innovation and natural resource sustainability: An application of neoclassical growth theory," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 19(1-2), pages 99-112, September.
    6. Ian J. Rappel & Neil H. Thomas, 1998. "An examination of the compatibility of World Bank policies towards population, development and biodiversity in the Third World," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 95-108, June.
    7. William D. Nordhaus, 1992. "Lethal Model 2: The Limits to Growth Revisited," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 23(2), pages 1-60.
    8. Zwane, Alix Peterson, 2007. "Does poverty constrain deforestation? Econometric evidence from Peru," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 330-349, September.
    9. Mehmet, Ozay, 1995. "Employment creation and green development strategy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 11-19, October.
    10. Yohei Harashima & Tsuneyuki Morita, 1998. "A comparative study on environmental policy development processes in the three East Asian countries: Japan, Korea, and China," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 1(1), pages 39-67, June.
    11. Moseley, William G., 2001. "African evidence on the relation of poverty, time preference and the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 317-326, September.
    12. Jenkins, T. N., 1998. "Economics and the environment: a case of ethical neglect," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 151-164, August.
    13. Michael T. Rock, 2002. "Pathways to industrial environmental improvement in the East Asian newly industrializing economies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 90-102, March.
    14. Mechthild Donner & Anne Verniquet & Jan Broeze & Katrin Kayser & Hugo de Vries, 2021. "Critical success and risk factors for circular business models valorising agricultural waste and by-products," Post-Print hal-03004851, HAL.
    15. Rahman, Abul & Khanam, Tahamina & Pelkonen, Paavo, 2017. "People’s knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes towards stump harvesting for bioenergy production in Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 107-116.
    16. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    17. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    18. Jim Butcher, 2006. "The United Nations International Year of Ecotourism: a critical analysis of development implications," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(2), pages 146-156, April.
    19. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    20. Muhammad Rafiq & Mir Kalan Shah, 2010. "The Value of Reduced Risk of Injury and Deaths in Pakistan—Using Actual and Perceived Risk Estimates," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 49(4), pages 823-837.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:7:y:2015:i:7:p:8240-8254:d:51672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.